Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Prodigal
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 18 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 116
|
Topic: Peter Jacksons LOTR. Which one? Posted: September 19 2005 at 12:00 |
Nipsey88 wrote:
Jackson has created the single greatest movie trilogy ever. |
I think the same.
|
|
transend
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 15 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 876
|
Posted: September 18 2005 at 18:37 |
Not sure why, but 'The two towers' did it for me...the visuals were just wonderful and I felt a little let down by TROTK coz it was just a tad 'sappy' for alot of the time, I was just waiting for Frodo and Sam to kiss...the book never seemed that wet..
|
|
Odysseus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 346
|
Posted: September 15 2005 at 14:51 |
The Whole Trilogy!
|
|
valravennz
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
|
Posted: September 07 2005 at 16:47 |
I like all of them - by the time the movies had been made, I had read LOTR twice - once as a teen and then a few years back. I think he stuck pretty much to the storyline. But as someone else mentioned, he missed out Tom Bombadil in "Fellowship" electing to place more emphasis on the Nazgul, or so it seemed. But that is a small gripe. Quite simply, the best movie trillogy made ... AND by a fellow countryman
|
"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp
|
|
Nipsey88
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: Kadath
Status: Offline
Points: 706
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 17:07 |
Apparently I just met the Feebles.
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 17:00 |
SomethingGood wrote:
die. please.
|
If you really want to scare me ... call The Frighteners!
(ok, I'll shut up now.)
|
|
|
SomethingGood
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 165
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 16:51 |
die. please.
|
Click the image. CLICK IT!!!
|
|
Ed_The_Dead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 16:32 |
Well, actually I am a arachnophobic, but Shelob (OR whathername) I dident find scary at all... and normally I should run out of the cinema screaming and wild-eyed...
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 16:09 |
|
|
|
SomethingGood
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 165
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:53 |
|
Click the image. CLICK IT!!!
|
|
Wolf Spider
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 04 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1617
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:39 |
|
|
|
Ed_The_Dead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:24 |
Snow Dog wrote:
The Return Of The King!!!!!! |
A Big YAY for Snowy
|
|
|
Heptade
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 427
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:22 |
I grew up on those books, and I found the movies hard to take (I mean,
Liv Tyler?). It's a matter of personal opinon and experience, though. I
prefer the BBC radio series, which was beautifully done (and available on
CD!).
|
The world keeps spinning, people keep sinning
And all the rest is just bullsh*t
-Steve Kilbey
|
|
CrazyDiamond
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:18 |
Trotsky wrote:
I voted for the purist thing, because that's closest to how I feel, but actually that's too harsh ... I think he it about 70% right ... the movies would have worked if I hadn't been such a big fan of the books ... (and I'll agree that not all the flaws are Jackson's ... any one else find it ridiculous that the "fighting" Uruk-Hai and the Nazgul are just so easily overcome?)
but some things I thought really sucked ... one of which was turning Gimli into comic relief ... I wasn't too thrilled by Aragorn going "let's hunt some Orc" either ...
|
I almost agree with you, but the three movies have something that is really enjoyable, I can't explain.. There is the so called "fluency", and the story goes..
Anyway, I prefer the books..
___BYE___
|
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 05:52 |
Dune,The Hobbit and the LOTR's are the books I read as a kid that totally got me into the fantasy/sci-fi genre and Jackson's movies are the only book to movie adaptation I have ever been really happy with(I even forgive him for leaving out Tom Bombadil),so I chose "the whole trilogy".Hard to pick just one but if I had to I would pick Return of the King.
|
|
|
Borealis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 599
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 16:52 |
Eetu Pellonpää wrote:
Here come's the social suicide...
I think Jacson did poor filmatisation of a medicore book. I read it as a kid and liked it. Tried to read it as an adult, but didn't manage to do it. I watched the first film (drunk, it helps), which had some nice element's, like the surroundings, Gandalf cathing the butterfly in the tower and the mines of moria sequence. I watched the second movie and screamed in agony. When Legolas surfed with the shield, I truly wanted to kill myself. I think the movie was total Hollywood crap. I'm sorry, I have no intentions to check the third movie.
For movies, I'm an irritating, elitistic euro trash. Tarkovski and Bunuel for me, thank you.
|
|
Vive le Québec libre!...
|
|
Eetu Pellonpaa
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 07:34 |
Here come's the social suicide...
I think Jacson did poor filmatisation of a medicore book. I read it as a kid and liked it. Tried to read it as an adult, but didn't manage to do it. I watched the first film (drunk, it helps), which had some nice element's, like the surroundings, Gandalf cathing the butterfly in the tower and the mines of moria sequence. I watched the second movie and screamed in agony. When Legolas surfed with the shield, I truly wanted to kill myself. I think the movie was total Hollywood crap. I'm sorry, I have no intentions to check the third movie.
For movies, I'm an irritating, elitistic euro trash. Tarkovski and Bunuel for me, thank you.
|
|
Wolf Spider
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 04 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1617
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 04:44 |
The whole trilogy is breath taking
|
|
|
Trotsky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 03:02 |
I voted for the purist thing, because that's closest to how I feel, but actually that's too harsh ... I think he it about 70% right ... the movies would have worked if I hadn't been such a big fan of the books ... (and I'll agree that not all the flaws are Jackson's ... any one else find it ridiculous that the "fighting" Uruk-Hai and the Nazgul are just so easily overcome?)
but some things I thought really sucked ... one of which was turning Gimli into comic relief ... I wasn't too thrilled by Aragorn going "let's hunt some Orc" either ...
|
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
|
GPFR
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 760
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 21:33 |
Fellowship of the Ring
|
www.myspace.com/hail_peter
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.