![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 19> |
Author | |||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
Can you post a link to a thread where they describe that in detail? I found some threads there, but the posts were not very clever - upsampling is an established technology and known to improve the quality of CD audio, and the members ridiculed it - a bit like myself in the other thread. Actually my statements still stand, but the smoothening of the signal can indeed improve the sound very much. So what I need now is some article which in detail explains WHAT X-Fi really does to the signal (and not just assumptions, I need FACTS). |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
I really enjoy not talking about how Gildenlow sucks or Neo-Prog rules for a change ... |
|||
![]() |
|||
goose ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
![]() |
||
I wasn't entirely clear in my post. I think mainly the hydrogenaudio way of thinking is that any modification to the signal is unwanted (and, ideally, we should be able to trust the original recording enough to avoid any post-processing. It's just a sad fact that a lot of masterings are horrible as well
![]() Fact (well, unless someone faked it I guess
![]() ![]() Waves LinMB is just a multi(5)band compressor/EQ, and the X-Fi Crystallizer seems to have almost the same effects on the sound signal!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
cobb ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: July 10 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1149 |
![]() |
||
You don't need specs to tell you the pc can do as good a job as a
player, Mike, your ears are already telling you that it can. Ignore
oliver- audiophiles are always like this. I don't need fancy graphing
images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job
all on their own.
![]() Edited by cobb |
|||
![]() |
|||
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
||
" I don't need fancing graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. "
Agree! |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
Agreed. I like how my system sounds, and no comment here can make me throw it away and buy a new one. But I'm always interested in improving the system. Although I'm largely opposed to audiophile systems, I really try to understand them. Here's a summary of what I found out so far:
If I look at my current system (Computer (Audigy 2) - Harman Kardon Amp - Elac speakers), I think that I might buy an X-Fi sound card for €110 and maybe upgrade my amp to a Musical Fidelity Avalon ... |
|||
![]() |
|||
cobb ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: July 10 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1149 |
![]() |
||
And then you will never have to leave your house ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
Hey, I'm already addicted to music. And I will even have to leave my house more often - to work and earn the additional money I need for my expensive hobby. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Can I ask something here, I hope its ok. Is it possible to rip Cds to MP3 using Windows Media Player aand using MP3 Pro? |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
No, I don't think so. Why would you want to use mp3pro? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Same sound quality at lower bitrate. |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
I was using mp3pro a few years ago and in the end I didn't like it. I ripped many CDs in 128kbps mp3pro format, but the problems with mobile players were annoying, and the quality isn't THAT better. mp3pro makes sense if you're using 64kbps - the results pretty much sounds like mp3 128kbps. But 128kbps mp3pro unfortunately doesn't sound like 256kbps mp3. What do you need the ripped files for? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Just for my hard drive, trying to be as space saving as possible. I was talking about the 64kbs rate as it happens! |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
I don't know how many CDs you're planing to archive ... I would recommend an external 200GB hard disk. I ripped my 650 CDs in 128-192kbps mp3 (VBR), and now I'm ripping many of them again in lossless format because it just sounds so much better. How many CDs will it be? |
|||
![]() |
|||
goose ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
![]() |
||
That graph tells me that there's compression, and my ears have already told me that compression sounds band (in this contex only, of course). Good enough for me.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Tony R ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
![]() |
||
Fun with Audiophiles!
Here's some stupid audiophile tricks you can get people to do - kids don't
try this at home!
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
I did a bit of reading on the X-Fi "Crystalizer", and I don't think that it uses compression in any way. I'm still looking for more meaningful graphs ... Edit: Have a look at this ... looks like the Crystalizer tries to reverse the compression that was applied when the signal was mastered to the CD: http://www.de.tomshardware.com/video/20050719/creative-x-fi- 04.html Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Don't know. There is no plan. I will not be buying anything extra... |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21466 |
![]() |
||
Have you tried WMA 64kbps or 96kbps? IMO it sounds much better than mp3 with extremely low bitrates. You can also consider ripping in two different formats, your favorite albums in 128kbps and the others in 64kbps ... or just rip your favorites. |
|||
![]() |
|||
KoS ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 17 2005 Location: Los Angeles Status: Offline Points: 16310 |
![]() |
||
audiophiles are crazy. i just dont get it
anywho i have a 75 watt 5.1 system its really good esp when i blast stuff like magma ![]() |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 19> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |