Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Moody Blues - Art Rock?!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMoody Blues - Art Rock?!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Moody Blues - Art Rock?!
    Posted: September 02 2005 at 12:23

How on God's earth did The Moody Blues get classified as "art rock?!"  Not only were they the first (or second) rock group to use an actual orchestra, but they were heavily mellotron- and keyboard-based from the get-go.  If these guys don't qualify as "symphonic prog," then no one does.

Max: are you listening?

Peace.

Back to Top
philippe View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 12:38
My voice will count for nothing but I think that The Moody Blues are far from progressive music. What I've heard from them sounds as pop music with discreet "psych" accents + "soft" ballads. I've surely not tried what they've done with orchestra and so on...so I can't decide on this one.

Edited by philippe
Back to Top
gabbel ratchett View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 12:40
The Moodys are symphonic, no doubt about it. Art rock, I don't think so.
dead things don't talk too well, they've got a shaky sense of diction.
Back to Top
Chris_Kemp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 12:49

Definitely a proto-prog band, one of the percursors to full-blown prog and a damn good one, too!

Back to Top
Flip_Stone View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 388
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 13:44

Man, forget the stupid and gay terminologies like "art-rock" and "proto-prog!   Labels like that don't mean squat!

The Moody Blues were simply one of the first progressive rock bands, maybe even the first!  But don't let their early orchestrations, early psychedelic/60's sound, or later commercial/pop songs get in the way.  They were doing some innovative and groundbreaking songwriting and playing back in a different time.  And the mellotron?  They were using it in ways bands hadn't at that point, and probably haven't since.

 



Edited by Flip_Stone
Back to Top
Chris_Kemp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 14:15
My comment wasn't meant to be a slam. They're great. My first introduction to the Mellotron at the tender age of 12.
Back to Top
robertplantowns View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 333
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 14:19
Originally posted by philippe philippe wrote:

My voice will count for nothing but I think that The Moody Blues are far from progressive music. What I've heard from them sounds as pop music with discreet "psych" accents + "soft" ballads. I've surely not tried what they've done with orchestra and so on...so I can't decide on this one.


???? Why would you even comment on this forum if you've never heard the progressive side of their music is beyond me.  I might as well say that Emerson, Lake and Palmer is pop-rock also because the only song of theirs I've heard is 'Lucky Man.'   If you see a topic that is unknown to you then skip over it. There's no use in wasting your two cents, you might as well keep the worthless change.  

Listen to Days of Future passed, there is nothing discreet about it.  Most of the album is full-blown orchestral music that rivals even some very good classical music.  They also mix in the classical elements brilliantly into their songs and even though it doesn't sound like progressive music as we know it today it was revolutionary at the time and cannot be considered anything else than very progressive music.  Even their most popular tune 'Nights in White Satin' has an entire orchestra in it, and everyone should know that one.  If they're not Symphonic Prog then the genre doesn't even exist because the Moody Blues are a hallmark and a forefather of the genre and not recognizing their place in progressive rock is a prog blasphemy.
Back to Top
Chris_Kemp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 14:24
They're also an important pioneer of the concept album.
Back to Top
DarHobo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 114
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 14:56
Moody Blues are awesome.
Back to Top
The Minstrel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 147
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 00:52
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

How on God's earth did The Moody Blues get classified as "art rock?!"  Not only were they the first (or second) rock group to use an actual orchestra, but they were heavily mellotron- and keyboard-based from the get-go.  If these guys don't qualify as "symphonic prog," then no one does.

Max: are you listening?

Peace.

Why does it matter if they are classified as symphonic prog or art rock? Seriously, who cares? What should matter is that the Moody Blues are an awesome band who greatly influenced the roots of prog. It's not like they said one day, "Let's be a symphonic prog band." We should let the music be what it is and not try and classify every single band.

Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:22

All:

The reason it "matters" what subgenre they are put in on PA is that there are many members - especially many of the newest, youngest crowd - who will be getring their "prog history" from this site.  Thus, it is critical that, to the greatest degree possible, all bands - especially the historical, "seminal" bands - be properly categorized so that those "learning" their prog "ABCs" here will "get it right the first time."

That is my concern.  I don't think it's misplaced.

Peace.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:26

Many bands in Art Rock and Prog Metal belong to other genres, some of which don't exist (yet). Some of the Art Rock bands (like Moody Blues) clearly belong in the Symphonic Prog genre, and many of the experimental bands in PRog Metal belong in RIO/Avant-Prog (Sleepytime Gorilla Museum would be an example here).

BTW: I never really understood what Art Rock meant, it always seemed like a catch-all genre for bands of the 70's that fit nowhere else.

Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:27
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

All:

The reason it "matters" what subgenre they are put in on PA is that there are many members - especially many of the newest, youngest crowd - who will be getring their "prog history" from this site.  Thus, it is critical that, to the greatest degree possible, all bands - especially the historical, "seminal" bands - be properly categorized so that those "learning" their prog "ABCs" here will "get it right the first time."

That is my concern.  I don't think it's misplaced.

Peace.

maani spelled a word wrong!!!!!!!!

mark this day on your calendar everyone!!!!!!!!

 

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:56

I believe taking their catalogue as a whole, Art rock is the right place for them. You are of course entirely right Maani about their pioneering work with orchestra, and their use of mellotron. Most of their albums though contain shorter uncomplicated tracks. For me symphonic prog is not so much to do with the use of orchestral sounds or instruments, but implies that the music is structured in a more complex, classical way.

I believe (correct me if I'm wrong), they only used an orchestra on one studio album. The "Have you heard" suite is for me Symphonic prog, but most of their tracks, while undoubtedly prog, are more at home in the Art rock category.

Back to Top
Drew View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 13:26

All i know is "nights in white satin" is one of the worst songs i have ever heard.

Back to Top
Zac M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 13:28
Originally posted by Drew Drew wrote:

All i know is "nights in white satin" is one of the worst songs i have ever heard.



Ummm are you sure about that, cuz i can think of many more that qualify as being worse than "Nights in White Satin"
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."

-Merleau-Ponty
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 13:35
Originally posted by Drew Drew wrote:

All i know is "nights in white satin" is one of the worst songs i have ever heard.

Drew, perhaps you could explain how you think that contributes to a constructive discussion?Confused

Back to Top
Zac M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 13:37
Thats simple, it doesnt contribute positively at all
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."

-Merleau-Ponty
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 14:11
You should label albums, not bands.
Back to Top
Syntharachnid View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 05 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 703
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:58

Originally posted by Eetu Pellonpää Eetu Pellonpää wrote:

You should label albums, not bands.

AHA!!!  An idea!  Yes, ladies and gents, this is what needs to be done.  The whole "King Crimson is not Symphonic!" idea would also be solved then!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.