Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Queen
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedQueen

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Should they be included at PA?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [32.50%]
54 [67.50%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Queen
    Posted: July 29 2005 at 22:21
Self-explanatory.  Just curious about this.
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2005 at 22:36
Still No...although i saw them here.....
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2005 at 23:15
God gave you grace to purge this place
And peace all around may be your fortune
Oh oh children of the land
Love is still the answer take my hand
The vision fades a voice I hear
Listen to the madman!
But still I fear and still I dare not
Laugh at the madman!
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2005 at 23:31

Yes, tuxon, Prophet Song is probably the most proggish thing they ever did, along with BR.  But does that make the band prog?  Do you really consider any of their albums wholly and entirely prog?  Because that is supposed to be the criterion by which a group is added to the site.

Peace.

Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 00:05

Queen II - Pomp prog, prog metal, with pompous ELP excess
A Night At The Opera - explained already I think
Flash Gordon - space progressive rock, comparable to some Hawkwind, a bit lighter, but definetly prog IMO

Sheer Heart attack is really near full-out prog, if it isn't already
Queen I is progressive aswell
After ANATO it waters down I agree, but before that it was most certainly progressive, and still the albums after ANATO can be considered Art Rock easily.

You have to want to see it

BTW the most proggiest thing they did was Fairy Feller's Masterstroke

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Drew View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 02:05
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 03:42

I would have liked a third option, "Now that they are here, should they be removed". My answer to that would be no.

I have always argued against their inclusion, but I'm not too bothered that they have been added. As I have said in other threads, they will simply find their way to the periphery of the site in due course.

It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already).

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:00
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Queen II - Pomp prog, prog metal, with pompous ELP excess  Progish maybe, don't understand the ELP comment!
A Night At The Opera - explained already I think   Again, some progish elements!
Flash Gordon - space progressive rock, comparable to some Hawkwind, a bit lighter, but definetly prog IMO  Again, only marginally prog

Sheer Heart attack is really near full-out prog, if it isn't already  Not Prog at all IMO
Queen I is progressive aswell    In what way i don't hear it!
After ANATO it waters down I agree, but before that it was most certainly progressive, and still the albums after ANATO can be considered Art Rock easily.

You have to want to see it

BTW the most proggiest thing they did was Fairy Feller's Masterstroke

Queen are great non-prog band!

Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:25
Sheer Heart Attack not prog at all?! It's their proggiest album IMO! (And their best).
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:32

Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

Sheer Heart Attack not prog at all?! It's their proggiest album IMO! (And their best).

I love the album (see my review) I've never ever thought of it as prog though! Maybe I'm wrong, whats prog about it?

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 12:55

This is ridiculous!

Queen are not prog.

They shouldnt be on the Archive in the Prog Section.

Tuxon's gone mad!

 

Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 13:36
No...while some of their earlier stuff is proggish,I don't think on a whole they were progressive enough to be included in the archives.


Back to Top
Frasse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 758
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 17:37
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already).



Made me curious of which band(s)?


I must say that this poll is quite bad, Queen are already in the archives and my opinion is that no bands should be deleted. Even so, I voted No.
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31350
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 19:00
Nah..!
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 22:28
I like Queen, but they don't belong on PA, though.
Back to Top
Logos View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2005 at 05:21
3 out of 4 forum members don't want them to be on this site. So there's really no question, they DON'T belong here.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2005 at 10:58
Originally posted by Frasse Frasse wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already).



Made me curious of which band(s)?


I must say that this poll is quite bad, Queen are already in the archives and my opinion is that no bands should be deleted. Even so, I voted No.

Sorry, I can't remember. I saw one in the list of new bands marked "sorry, removed" or something like that.

Back to Top
Drachen Theaker View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 22 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 376
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2005 at 17:26

Queen were never considered prog and were thought of as a glam metal band. When they came along they were a kind of Bowie/Zeppelin hybrid - neither of whom are in the archives.

Yes, they had proggy elements to their sound but practically everyone did in the 70s - the two artists I mentioned above, Lou Reed, Black Sabbath, 10cc, The Who, Wishbone Ash, Deep Purple, even Elton John at times!

A great band but they don't belong on here.



Edited by Drachen Theaker
"It's 1973, almost dinnertime and I'm 'aving 'oops!" - Gene Hunt
Back to Top
Dreamer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 13 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Status: Offline
Points: 297
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2005 at 07:06
The results should speak for themselves. Shame it had to come to this with such a great band like queen
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2005 at 20:09

Their first three albums are fantastic (I'm not so fond of the fourth, but recognise I'm in a very small minority). I don't consider them Progressive Rock, though. Some progressive traits in some songs, but I just don't put them in the same basket as the undisputed Prog Rock groups. That 1973 Melody Maker article sums it up for me as far as the first few albums are concerned: "commercial in a progressive kind of way".

 I'm not too fused about QUEEN being in the Archives, but would have preferred the albums to have been listed under another category that reflects the fact that the group were considered a Glam Rock band and that the first albums are not full-blown Prog Rock. And that the music went downhill after that (in my opinion, of course); the infamous Fat Bottomed Girls and Flash's Theme make me cringe (By the way, any of you seen the 1974 cult film Flesh Gordon? It's much more entertaining than the 1980 Flash Gordon).

Mind you, there are other groups in the Archives that I wouldn't have added either, but that's another story.

 

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.