Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report abuse here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Inappropriate reviews
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedInappropriate reviews
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 134135136137138 141>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 14:48
OK let me clear something up. I in no way support what that reviewer said. My laughy face was at his idiocy, not at what he wrote. He is a troll, plain and simple folks. He is trying to bait you, make you angry; that's what trolls do. I was determined NOT to let him upset me; hence the laughy face. Heck, if you let every lamer on the internet ruin your day, you aren't going to have much fun online.

Edited by Ben2112
Back to Top
Hangedman View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 13:58
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

It's turned into a discussion - this underlines why I think people should have to REGISTER before being allowed to create reviews;

YES Relayer
Review by Roger @ 4:16:49 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  This lines for progmaster: I am chocked that you let the "Robert le Plant" review on line. You have to delete this review full off racism and insanities. This man is not a prog lover and has nothing to do here. Many thanks in advance.

YES Relayer
Review by Raelrules @ 5:10:16 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  This album is superb period. Concerning le Plant's attack on Jon Anderson, his stance is paradoxal (not to mention just plain nasty and intolerant), in that he professes himself, an undisguised affection for sweat drenched male bodies, hairy torsos and perfectly suared jaws, go figure. All I can say is.. get a life !

YES Relayer
Review by Tony Dodd @ 5:19:12 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  Note to "Robert le Plant"; 1) John Anderson isn't gay. 2) So what if he was. 3) You are deliberately offensive and don't express yourself very well; you may have other issues in your life which explain this. 4) You don't like the album - that's perfectly OK. Lots of people more intelligent than you don't like it either. 5) I would be happy to read some more positive reviews from you, perhaps of albums that you do like. Smile and be happy.

YES Relayer
Review by iguana @ 8:09:38 AM EST, 4/5/2005
3 stars  —  look, you fools, let me whack all THREE of you on the head – robert le plant: nice try to start up a bit of an argument and to polarize opinions, but boy did you screw up... you made a right dork out of yourself with your childish homophobic attitude *yawn* + raelrules & tony dodd: you folks are perfect proof that progressive rock listeners have no sense of humour at all, concerning that we are supposed to be intellectually MILES above thick pieces of sh*t like him. how very sad indeed ... erm, good album! the swiss poodle was an interesting addition and "sound chaser" & "to be over" were almost destined to be outshadowed by "the gates of delirium". not the best album to start off your YES-collection, though, you'll be better of with "drama" as a first ;-)>

 yeah thats a good point certif1ed
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 08:49

It's turned into a discussion - this underlines why I think people should have to REGISTER before being allowed to create reviews;

YES Relayer
Review by Roger @ 4:16:49 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  This lines for progmaster: I am chocked that you let the "Robert le Plant" review on line. You have to delete this review full off racism and insanities. This man is not a prog lover and has nothing to do here. Many thanks in advance.

YES Relayer
Review by Raelrules @ 5:10:16 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  This album is superb period. Concerning le Plant's attack on Jon Anderson, his stance is paradoxal (not to mention just plain nasty and intolerant), in that he professes himself, an undisguised affection for sweat drenched male bodies, hairy torsos and perfectly suared jaws, go figure. All I can say is.. get a life !

YES Relayer
Review by Tony Dodd @ 5:19:12 AM EST, 4/5/2005
5 stars  —  Note to "Robert le Plant"; 1) John Anderson isn't gay. 2) So what if he was. 3) You are deliberately offensive and don't express yourself very well; you may have other issues in your life which explain this. 4) You don't like the album - that's perfectly OK. Lots of people more intelligent than you don't like it either. 5) I would be happy to read some more positive reviews from you, perhaps of albums that you do like. Smile and be happy.

YES Relayer
Review by iguana @ 8:09:38 AM EST, 4/5/2005
3 stars  —  look, you fools, let me whack all THREE of you on the head – robert le plant: nice try to start up a bit of an argument and to polarize opinions, but boy did you screw up... you made a right dork out of yourself with your childish homophobic attitude *yawn* + raelrules & tony dodd: you folks are perfect proof that progressive rock listeners have no sense of humour at all, concerning that we are supposed to be intellectually MILES above thick pieces of sh*t like him. how very sad indeed ... erm, good album! the swiss poodle was an interesting addition and "sound chaser" & "to be over" were almost destined to be outshadowed by "the gates of delirium". not the best album to start off your YES-collection, though, you'll be better of with "drama" as a first ;-)>

Back to Top
Seyo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 08 2004
Location: Bosnia
Status: Offline
Points: 1320 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 04:11
I agree, this "review" clearly falls under the sanctions of Civility Guidelines, it is very abusive and intolerant and not related to music whatsoever.

I vote for removal!
Back to Top
valravennz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 03:27
Originally posted by Ben2112 Ben2112 wrote:

A new classic?

YES Relayer progressive rock album and reviews YES - Relayer
Review by Robert le Plant @ 12:52:11 AM EST, 4/5/2005

0 stars  —   Man, what the hell is the matter with Jon Anderson! This album prove sht at homosexuals can't sing or write music! Clearly! I mean klisten ot his whiney woman voice, sounds like he's trying to sing like Robert Plant, a cleatrly superior vocalist, but no queer can ever sing like Robert Plant, or stand on stage with such manly integrity. Sweat wouldn't look good on Jon Anderson's gay Chest, only that perfectly fur covered man chest of Robert Plant. Jon Anderson's ugly faggy monkey face is nothing like that perfectly squared Jaw of Robert Plant, and his beutiful thinking eyes penetrate in ways Jon Anderson's never could, and that's not the only thing you want Robert Plant ot penetr... Umm, so Relayer is a terrible album Stay away, uless you like ugly Gay people who can't sing!
 
 

I can't laugh at this rubbish. It is abusive, insulting to any the forum's gay members and to the Artist(s).

Please have this removed ASAP.


"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp


Back to Top
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 03:20

A new classic?

YES Relayer progressive rock album and reviews YES - Relayer
Review by Robert le Plant @ 12:52:11 AM EST, 4/5/2005

0 stars  —   Man, what the hell is the matter with Jon Anderson! This album prove sht at homosexuals can't sing or write music! Clearly! I mean klisten ot his whiney woman voice, sounds like he's trying to sing like Robert Plant, a cleatrly superior vocalist, but no queer can ever sing like Robert Plant, or stand on stage with such manly integrity. Sweat wouldn't look good on Jon Anderson's gay Chest, only that perfectly fur covered man chest of Robert Plant. Jon Anderson's ugly faggy monkey face is nothing like that perfectly squared Jaw of Robert Plant, and his beutiful thinking eyes penetrate in ways Jon Anderson's never could, and that's not the only thing you want Robert Plant ot penetr... Umm, so Relayer is a terrible album Stay away, uless you like ugly Gay people who can't sing!
 
 
Back to Top
Hangedman View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 00:40
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

KING CRIMSON In the Court of the Crimson King
Review by Breed Lover @ 10:14:28 AM EST, 12/9/2003
0 stars  —  well jesus christ o mighty where do i start here, yes it's one of them [%*!#]ing crap pieces of [&*!#], robert fripp is a c**t and he sucks dildos all day long and greg lake bends over for michael giles, yes sounds like king crimson, well they suck and this album is crap, slipknot is class 5 stars for all their album, piss on this cd, snap it up, throw it in the bin and shove it up your minge and save your money, king crimson sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


Date says 12/9/2003, has this been here all this time?

aha thats a classic
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 00:02
Originally posted by Useful_Idiot Useful_Idiot wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

STRAWBS Heartbreak Hill progressive rock album and reviews STRAWBS - Heartbreak Hill
Review by rick petersen @ 9:03:57 PM EST, 4/4/2005
1 stars  —   An attempt to recapture their mid-70's prog magic that fails miserably. Mimicry alone does not a good product make. The recipe: write some generic songs and dress them up in overly-familiar, proggy arrangements. Add an unlistenable production job that makes you think something's wrong with your stereo (a slightly tinny, canned sound with little presence). Cousin's voice was still intact, but it doesn't matter. This one's a stinker.

What's wrong with that one?

Absolutly nothing, maybe he could have been more precies in why it is a bad album, but there's little wrong with the review itself.

 

Get over it guys, only reviews that are NOT APROPRIATE, bad language, and band inten should be reported. i've seen already too many reviews here that are good in itself.
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Bryan View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3013 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 21:59
Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

STRAWBS Heartbreak Hill progressive rock album and reviews STRAWBS - Heartbreak Hill
Review by rick petersen @ 9:03:57 PM EST, 4/4/2005
1 stars  —   An attempt to recapture their mid-70's prog magic that fails miserably. Mimicry alone does not a good product make. The recipe: write some generic songs and dress them up in overly-familiar, proggy arrangements. Add an unlistenable production job that makes you think something's wrong with your stereo (a slightly tinny, canned sound with little presence). Cousin's voice was still intact, but it doesn't matter. This one's a stinker.

What's wrong with that one?
Back to Top
Cygnus X-2 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 21:05
STRAWBS Heartbreak Hill progressive rock album and reviews STRAWBS - Heartbreak Hill
Review by rick petersen @ 9:03:57 PM EST, 4/4/2005
1 stars  —   An attempt to recapture their mid-70's prog magic that fails miserably. Mimicry alone does not a good product make. The recipe: write some generic songs and dress them up in overly-familiar, proggy arrangements. Add an unlistenable production job that makes you think something's wrong with your stereo (a slightly tinny, canned sound with little presence). Cousin's voice was still intact, but it doesn't matter. This one's a stinker.
Back to Top
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 19:44
Holy wow! How was that missed for so long?!?

Edited by Ben2112
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 06:00
KING CRIMSON In the Court of the Crimson King
Review by Breed Lover @ 10:14:28 AM EST, 12/9/2003
0 stars  —  well jesus christ o mighty where do i start here, yes it's one of them [%*!#]ing crap pieces of [&*!#], robert fripp is a c**t and he sucks dildos all day long and greg lake bends over for michael giles, yes sounds like king crimson, well they suck and this album is crap, slipknot is class 5 stars for all their album, piss on this cd, snap it up, throw it in the bin and shove it up your minge and save your money, king crimson sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Date says 12/9/2003, has this been here all this time?
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 04:41
Originally posted by Manunkind Manunkind wrote:

THAT DOES IT! What is this, a 'Let's hate Manunkind' - thread?!! Tuxon, goose, Cluster One, get over here and fight like men!!!

Just call me before you get on the plane so that I can get to the airport on time...

I don't hate you unkind man,
I just think you shouldn't call opinions that aren't yours inapropriate
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Radioactive Toy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 06 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 953 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2005 at 11:04
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

For deletion!!

GENESIS Foxtrot progressive rock album and reviews GENESIS - Foxtrot
Review by Breed Lover @ 3:13:58 PM EST, 3/30/2005

0 stars  —   I hate this [%*!#]ing album it sucks big time, Peter Gabriel is a [%*!#]ing dickhead and Phil Collins is his gay lover all GENESIS SUCKS I repeat SUCKS. avoid this piece of [&*!#] and all GENESIS albums Watchers of the Skies is Crap so, piss on my copy , im going to play slipknot they are cool


Reed's failed joke counter:
|||||
R.I.P. You could have reached infinity....
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2005 at 10:36

THAT DOES IT! What is this, a 'Let's hate Manunkind' - thread?!! Tuxon, goose, Cluster One, get over here and fight like men!!!

Just call me before you get on the plane so that I can get to the airport on time...



Edited by Manunkind
"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Cluster One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 780 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2005 at 07:51
I disagree with that guy's review of AMLOR completely! But at least he attempted to explain his (false) reasoning, and so of course it should be kept. To each his own.

Nothing wrong with the review really, except for all his opinions and low rating of course
Marmalade...I like marmalade.
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2005 at 18:21
Nah I think that's a fine review. It waffles a bit (to make a somewhat hypocritical point), but it gives plenty of opinions about the album and goes some way to justify them.
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2005 at 17:54
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Originally posted by Manunkind Manunkind wrote:

PINK FLOYD A Momentary Lapse of Reason
Review by pinkfloydlover @ 2:43:48 AM EST, 4/2/2005
1 stars  —  if people really appreciate that music that Pink Floyd did, they would not buy this hideous excuse of an album. maybe two songs (learning to fly and sorrow) are good, but they don't even live up to expectations i had of this album. let's start with the first song, it's boring, ineffective, and poorly done. songs with lyrics, we can just kind of group those all into one description...the songwriters obviously were trying to overblow what they thought roger waters, who is the greatest songwriter in all of progressive/art rock, would write and just sort of made him seem like the guy who didn't care about what he was writing...here is some news for all of the songwriters on this album...HE CARED! im sure that he has probably heard the album and laughed when he heard the song "Dogs of War", which is probably THE worst Floyd song i have had the audacity to hear, i mean could it be more...horrible? then there are the "filler" tracks that don't necessarily need to be there at all, example a new machine pt. 1 and 2, i think GILMOUR put those in just to feel like he had taken control of the band and the music. they're boring, over-blown, and poorly written, and he said that "Vera" and "Bring the Boys Back Home" from "The Wall" were bad, but he must think this is good...please think twice before buying this...since I am a completionist and intend on having every one of their albums(I'm at 12), i bought it...as a matter of fact, i would get an iTunes account if i were you and just download the album and not waste your money. thank you for taking the time to read my criticism.
 
 
You're welcome, but it was time lost as far as I'm concerned.
 
 
 

What's wrong with this review?????????????????????????????

50% of it is basically speculations about Gilmour and Waters, and the reviewer's opinions aren't backed up with any attempts at describing the music, IMO.

Let M@X decide, though.
"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2005 at 16:45
TOOL Lateralus progressive rock album and reviews TOOL - Lateralus
Review by Marco @ 4:42:54 PM EST, 4/2/2005
2 stars  —   Hey guys, what are you listening to ? This is not prog, definitely ! Maybe is not a bad record of something else, but let me say, once again this is not prog and the maximum rate that it could reach is 2.... If you give 5 to this how many you have to give to Genesis Selling England by the pound, or ELP Tarkus, or Crimson In the wake of Poseidon...? Sorry for those who really like this music, but this is Progarchives..
 
Throroughly superfluous. How about talking about the album itself a little bit? Yet another review made solely to "make a point".
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2005 at 14:05
Originally posted by Manunkind Manunkind wrote:

PINK FLOYD A Momentary Lapse of Reason
Review by pinkfloydlover @ 2:43:48 AM EST, 4/2/2005
1 stars  —  if people really appreciate that music that Pink Floyd did, they would not buy this hideous excuse of an album. maybe two songs (learning to fly and sorrow) are good, but they don't even live up to expectations i had of this album. let's start with the first song, it's boring, ineffective, and poorly done. songs with lyrics, we can just kind of group those all into one description...the songwriters obviously were trying to overblow what they thought roger waters, who is the greatest songwriter in all of progressive/art rock, would write and just sort of made him seem like the guy who didn't care about what he was writing...here is some news for all of the songwriters on this album...HE CARED! im sure that he has probably heard the album and laughed when he heard the song "Dogs of War", which is probably THE worst Floyd song i have had the audacity to hear, i mean could it be more...horrible? then there are the "filler" tracks that don't necessarily need to be there at all, example a new machine pt. 1 and 2, i think GILMOUR put those in just to feel like he had taken control of the band and the music. they're boring, over-blown, and poorly written, and he said that "Vera" and "Bring the Boys Back Home" from "The Wall" were bad, but he must think this is good...please think twice before buying this...since I am a completionist and intend on having every one of their albums(I'm at 12), i bought it...as a matter of fact, i would get an iTunes account if i were you and just download the album and not waste your money. thank you for taking the time to read my criticism.
 
 
You're welcome, but it was time as lost as far as I'm concerned.
 
 
 

What's wrong with this review?????????????????????????????
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 134135136137138 141>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.379 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.