![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Author | |||
Mascodagama ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 5111 |
![]() Posted: October 28 2017 at 08:03 |
||
This must be about the best example out there. Sabbath was resoundingly shat on by pretty much every critic throughout the seventies, whilst in their first six albums they laid down one of the greatest sequences of recordings in the history of rock. Zappa got it of course - a man who had something memorably pithy to say about rock journalism! Edited by Mascodagama - October 28 2017 at 08:06 |
|||
Soldato of the Pan Head Mafia. We'll make you an offer you can't listen to.
Bandcamp Profile |
|||
![]() |
|||
AFlowerKingCrimson ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18987 |
![]() |
||
What album did the critics get wrong? Pretty much every prog album ever made not by a band or artist with the initials PF or FZ.
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Squonk19 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 03 2015 Location: Darlington, UK Status: Offline Points: 4789 |
![]() |
||
Geoff Barton in Sounds here in the UK gave Hemispheres a disappointing review - which affected by view of him considerably, when he was the one who pushed Rush in the earlier years. I know the album divides some fans, but I honestly think it's their most underrated album. It just came out at the wrong time - when all the mainstream British press were wetting themselves over punk/new wave scene.
Agree about Exile and Animals from earlier posts. Always thought Crest of a Knave was over-rated by the press (and the Grammy committee) - while Songs from the Wood didn't get the credit it deserved at the time - again, because it was swimming against the tide at the time. I remember the hammering Tusk took for not being the new Rumours. Not my favourite album, but it had its moments; was quite experimental, and only now are critics reassessing it. As for the likes of Black Sabbath - when did the critics ever give them praise? Only with Never Say Die did they get it right by default. |
|||
“Living in their pools, they soon forget about the sea.”
|
|||
![]() |
|||
rogerthat ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
![]() |
||
I think critics missing the point of an album at the time of its release is almost the norm with the exception of some big bands they are obliged to promote ( The reviews of Red printed on the flap of the CD cover are very mixed and praise is qualified and reserved. Since Renaissance were mentioned, Novella was (and still is by Allmusic) viewed as too precious while at the same time Annie in Wonderland was punished for its variety. You can't win either way, apparently. Christgau lost interest in Steely Dan after Can't Buy A Thrill. Then again, Christgau seems to have a notoriously small attention span as well as being unreasonably suspicious of 'European imports'.
On the flipside, why exactly is an album like Appetite for Destruction so important? OK, it's a nice rock album, kicks ass but with the passage of time, it becomes more and more difficult to attach credibility to claims about their originality as they seem very derivative of hard rock in the AC DC/Thin Lizzy mould. What exactly did they bring to rock that was 'new'? I understand (though don't really agree with) the argument that they signalled a return to roots after the onslaught of slick pop metal but even so, it feels very unsubstantial, very unappetising (ironically) for an album of its repute. Yeah, sure, Slash played with a lot of flavour but so did Chris Poland and if he could run rings around Dave Mustaine (as confessed by Mustaine himself), pretty sure he would own Slash too. So more like 'real metal' was too heavy for the brittle bones of aging critics who instead preferred a radio friendly and more boring alternative. Nothing much to add to the earlier discussion on Wall, lol. From a pure prog perspective, I don't know that many albums at all that the critics over-rated badly. They tended to thrash most of them with qualified praise for a few. Even the concerts...one stinging review of a Steely Dan show provided the impetus for the band to abandon touring altogether. If you listen to the concert, you will understand. Their only 'mistake' was to play faster than the studio originals and for this they earned the ire of the critic.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
ProfPanglos ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 25 2017 Location: Austin, Texas Status: Offline Points: 624 |
![]() |
||
The Wall's greatness is unmatched, in my mind. Whenever radio stations used to play the "Top 100" or "Top 1000" classic rock songs or whatever, inevitably they end with Free Bird, or Stairway to Heaven, or maybe Hotel California. The G.O.A.T. rock album typically ends up being Led Zeppelin's IV or DSoTM or maybe Sgt. Peppers. In my personal opinion, The Wall is the single greatest rock album of all time, and Another Brick in the Wall Pt. 2 is the greatest single anthem in rock history.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kenethlevine ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Prog-Folk Team Joined: December 06 2006 Location: New England Status: Offline Points: 9093 |
![]() |
||
I was in Ottawa at the time and the FM radio station seemed to like it. I got all my dorm friends into Renaissance at the time. I remember it being on the US charts, and at a higher position than what Billboard now claims it reached - perhaps there is revisionist history in the charts when it suits historians. I thought it was a really good album and a credible move forward for Renaissance. With proper promotion and a bit of luck it could have launched them into a successful decade. I would probably never have regarded it as the equal of the mid 70s stuff but I can't begrudge a band hitting paydirt either. It's a bit ironic that critics savaged it given that they savaged most of Renaissance classic releases for being pretentious and precious, yet when they made a decent stab at straightforward rock, they were criticized for abandoning the style that got them all the bad reviews in the first place. Ashes are Burning, the album, got 1 star in the Rolling Stone record guide. 1 star! Absolutely ludicrous. 40 years later it is around 30 on the RS all time greatest prog rock albums. Vindication perhaps, but maybe some gentler more sympathetic reviews early on could have given the band the recognition they deserved
Edited by kenethlevine - September 18 2017 at 11:36 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Lewian ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
![]() |
||
I think pretty much everyone tore Renaissance's Camera Camera to shreds (including some band members, later), but I consider this a very unique, fresh and original if somewhat disoriented album.
Edited by Lewian - September 18 2017 at 05:38 |
|||
![]() |
|||
AFlowerKingCrimson ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18987 |
![]() |
||
Close to the Edge. I think Robert Christgau gave it a C plus which is actually pretty good for a prog album by that turkey. It sold ok back in the day and eventually went platinum but then prog went out of fashion and unlike Dark side of the moon it was forgotten for about thirty years or so(aside from yes fanatics). Recently however, as in the past ten years, it has garnered all sorts of praise and even has a cruise that is named in it's honor(cruise to the edge). It also has shown up in lots of lists(and books)as being regarded as one of the top prog albums of all time. Meanwhile in the larger non prog world it is still a tiny little album in comparison to Dark side of the Moon(sales wise that is).
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - September 17 2017 at 22:55 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Frankh ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 14 2017 Location: Schenectady NY Status: Offline Points: 214 |
![]() |
||
At our age, or mine at least, I AM a Fla-----
Um. Nvm. Any recording that has generated the volume of debate and the extreme variance of opinion over as great a period of time almost by default must now be viewed as greatly underrated. If not classic. For such is TALES. Made for this thread. Edited by Frankh - September 17 2017 at 18:28 |
|||
![]() |
|||
mechanicalflattery ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 08 2016 Location: Seattle Status: Offline Points: 1056 |
![]() |
||
The distinction I would note with Christgau is that he criticizes prog (and metal, among other genres) not for being ambitious, but for those ambitions being (ostensibly) unfulfilled. He regards Yes not as rebels against constraining conventions, but merely as artificial psuedosensitive college boys arbitrarily assembling shallow influences from a dozen haphazard sources. Granted, he's wrong, but his wrongness is not inherently anti-intellectual or pro-status quo. He likes a great deal of experimental and "progressive" music, just not those groups he views as undeservedly grandiose. If Yes is as great as we all believe, the detractors should be welcomed and confronted, not dismissed offhandedly. At the risk of sounding platitudinous, confronting opposing viewpoints really is valuable not just for understanding the beliefs of others, but for understanding your own.
And there really needs to be prog album titled Flatulent Quasisymphonies... Edited by mechanicalflattery - September 17 2017 at 14:19 |
|||
![]() |
|||
verslibre ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 18657 |
![]() |
||
"Flatulent quasisymphonies"! LMAO!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
The.Crimson.King ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 29 2013 Location: WA Status: Offline Points: 4596 |
![]() |
||
How about these gems from the prog hating RS writer Robert Christgau.
Close to the Edge [Atlantic, 1972]
Tales from Topographic Oceans [Atlantic, 1974] |
|||
![]() |
|||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Online Points: 12484 |
![]() |
||
...The use of technology, which for many Rolling Stone reviewers included Mellotrons, Moogs and other synthesisers, was viewed by many as outside the bounds of rock and roll. But of course these were staple instruments in most progressive rock groups of the era and they were often described as 'keyboard-centred' or 'keyboard-oriented'. Dave Marsh noted that art rock had a 'general obsession with synthesizers and other gadgets'. An early example was Ed Ward's review of In the Wake of Poseidon which is described as 'more Mellotron death of the universe rock from King Crimson'. Ward's disdain for Abbey Road was partly based on his dislike on how the sounds had been manufactured with Moog, tape splice and other electronic gimmickry to 'create a sound that could not possibly exist outside of the studio'... ...The virtuosity of many of the musicians in the genre became problematic for some reviewers as taunts of intellectual arrogance were made. Dave Marsh summed it up when he said that the genre espoused 'a kind of a class based cult of musicianship, which is truly arrogant because it refuses to articulate just what moods its complex structures are meant to evoke. Eclectic experimentalism is determinedly middle class.' So the problem was a mix of intelligence, education and social class. Progressive rock attracted a better educated musician and audience and did not try to pander to the lowest common denominator. Roger Dean once told me that Yes fans were comprised mainly of university or college students in the 1970s, a different demographic to the fans of most other rock groups... There's many more examples. I think all art deserves to be judged for what it has set out to achieve and not be criticized for what it isn't - nor tries to be (rock 'n roll in this context). -No matter how negative the review I would most certainly had run to the nearest record shop to get my hands on that Mellotron death of the universe rock-album though.
Edited by Saperlipopette! - September 17 2017 at 13:10 |
|||
![]() |
|||
BaldJean ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: May 28 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10387 |
![]() |
||
I just listened to the album again, and I think a line from "Dogs" best describes what's wrong with it:
"and it's too late to lose the weight you used to need to throw around". exactly! the whole album just sounds fat-arsed, or to quote a line from the Amon Düül 2 album "Hi-Jack" (an album that is no better than "Animals"): "go tell the star his hair is turning gray, all the people disappear and the spotlight is fading away" |
|||
![]() A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Online Points: 37422 |
![]() |
||
^^ Same Cristi. I can appreciate that someone might not enjoy it, but to believe it to be a bad album (of its ilk) is another matter.
Those are my favourites too, though I love every Floyd album up to and including The Wall.
"Sheep" has similarities to "One of These Days", love the track, but it doesn't sound "just like" it. I have no problem with drawing inspiration from earlier material, and actually like many variations on the same theme, or re-worked themes by the same artist. One example would be Magma's Ëmëhntëhtt-Ré , which adapts themes from earlier material, but I think does it with a wonderful result. I don't believe that Animals sounds that much like any former Pink Floyd album overall, and is hardly one that I would accuse of being derivative or lacking uniqueness in an oeuvre. I have known people who disliked it because it sounded too different from the popular Pink Floyd that they liked. By BOF, do you mean birds of a feather? I don't get that can't get their arse off the seats impressions at all from the album, except perhaps as a lyrical reference to creeping malaise. "Gotta stay awake, gotta try and shake off this creeping malaise. If I don't stand my own ground, how can I find my way out of this maze?" Love to read a more detailed review of yours on the album, as I am interested in different perspectives, and to get a fuller picture of your thoughts. EDiT: Cristi, I missed your last post as I was multitasking while preparing this, but I too find it a pretty unique album -- an unusually unique album in fact (I touched on that in this post and don't want it to seem that I am just "repeating" your notion). Edited by Logan - September 17 2017 at 10:08 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Cristi ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 45775 |
![]() |
||
^ repeat themselves? I think Animals is quite unique in their discography.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
BaldJean ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: May 28 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10387 |
![]() |
||
first of all Pink Floyd start repeating themselves; "Sheep" sounds just like "One of these Days". second they sound like BOFs that can't get their a**** off the seats anymore |
|||
![]() A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta |
|||
![]() |
|||
Cristi ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 45775 |
![]() |
||
I don't get what people find wrong with Animals.
Dogs and Sheep are two of my favorite PF songs. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guldbamsen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
![]() |
||
Funny how that works. Animals is my favourite Floyd album together with Ummagumma and Atom Heart Mother (and More actually although it isn't as "strong" of an album as the above mentioned...but it's a charming little bugger to these ears).
|
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Online Points: 37422 |
![]() |
||
^^ Very well expressed, mechanicalflattery.
^ Interesting, Jean, why in your opinion is Animals certainly a bad album? |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |