Budget headphone's selection -update- |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
Kid-A
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 613 |
Topic: Budget headphone's selection -update- Posted: April 20 2008 at 17:32 |
||
Koss Ksc-75 clip-ons.
|
|||
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 27 2008 at 09:30 | ||
Haven't tried the K 416. The EH350 are not very confortable indeed. I warmly recommend the Beyerdynamic DT231 Pro over the EH350: very confortable and more musical, plus it's cheaper! |
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 27 2008 at 09:25 | ||
I just get your post. Happy that you're happy with the PX100. It's the smallest good headphone on the market, along with the Koss "Porta Pro" in the same league. And it's much better than higher models feat isolation (PX250 and so on, to avoid). What source do you use? Ipod? Edited by oliverstoned - March 27 2008 at 09:30 |
|||
Novalis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 15 2007 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 338 |
Posted: March 26 2008 at 01:11 | ||
What does anyone think about the AKG K 416?
Also, I've been told that the Sennheiser EH 350s are great but not very comfortable. Thoughts? Edited by Novalis - March 26 2008 at 01:16 |
|||
Jimbo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 28 2005 Location: Helsinki Status: Offline Points: 2818 |
Posted: March 08 2008 at 04:43 | ||
Cheers Oliver, I just bought a pair of Sennheiser PX 100's, and they're fantastic!
|
|||
|
|||
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Planet Gong Status: Offline Points: 8890 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 12:06 | ||
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/20/electric_earbuds/ That's mostly just for the "earbud" type in-ears, not the "ear canal" ones which are more expensive and higher quality. I've only used one pair of ear canal headphones, and I really didn't like it. Sure, they sounded better than cheap iPod earbuds, but I found them more uncomfortable than big 'phones and didn't sound as good (my friend apparently spent $80 I believe on the pair, so they weren't that cheap) as my Grados or even the cheap Sennheiser HD 202s. They reduced about as much noise as my closed big 'phones, I'm not sure how they'd compare with big headphones that are specifically noise cancelling. So basically, it's preference, like many things. And from what I heard, in-ears aren't my thing. |
|||
|
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 10:34 | ||
^ Can't disagree with that, the less outside noise infiltration, the lower the volume you can go and enjoy the music.
|
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21328 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 10:26 | ||
Why should they be bad for your hearing? The danger for your hearing depends on the volume, not on the form of the headphones. And good in-ear headphones are actually better for the ear because they filter out environmental noise and thus allow you to listen at low volume without being distracted. |
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 10:20 | ||
Well, I'd love to try out some $400 headphones someday, but it they're that good, maybe I should avoid them at all costs...
|
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Planet Gong Status: Offline Points: 8890 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 09:49 | ||
Personally, I find them less comfortable than big headphones and they're worse for your hearing apparently, which is something I don't want to wane any time soon. Plus, I think a lot of Sennheisers look really neat; and the Grados, not as much, I usually wear them at home anyway, since they're open. |
|||
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21328 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 09:29 | ||
Why don't Sennheiser mention anything about a dedicated amp on their pages about the HD models? |
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 09:06 | ||
We're slightly off-topic. We're talking about HD600's which are not exactly budget headphones, but extremely cheap for what's the best electro-dynamic headphones on the market. But unfortunatly, it require a dedicated amp, and no headphone amp output, even on great electronics, is good enough to reveal their full capacities. Edited by oliverstoned - January 27 2008 at 09:07 |
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 09:03 | ||
...drive it properly? Certainly not. |
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 06:15 | ||
The price tag of course. Budget headphones if money is no object? Edited by Slartibartfast - January 27 2008 at 06:16 |
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21328 |
Posted: January 27 2008 at 02:26 | ||
^ in-ear headphones are *ideal* for that. Nearly all environmental noise is filtered out, and there is virtually no sound leakage. And because they are so small and so close to the ear membrane, they need very little power, so your batteries will last longer. And last but not least: You look less "nerdy" than someone walking around in a subway with big headphones.
|
|||
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Planet Gong Status: Offline Points: 8890 |
Posted: January 26 2008 at 18:06 | ||
The HD555s are open headphones right? I'd prefer closed because I like filtering out some noise when I'm listening to music and I'm sure sound leakage is annoying for people around me as well.
|
|||
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21328 |
Posted: January 26 2008 at 09:58 | ||
Maybe I'll get the HD 555 ... but not the amp. My hi-fi is more than capable of driving big headphones, and I would never use such big headphones in a mobile situation. For that I strongly recommend in-ear headphones.
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: January 26 2008 at 06:48 | ||
What do you mean? Do you find it great or too expensive?
From my experience, i warmly recommend it. I've recently tried the Headroom Micro Amp with HD 600 & 650 (i've got both) and it's very good, though of course not as good as my Sugden Le Bijou (Class A also)home headphone amp (which costs around 1500 dollars new). But i made a mistake when ordering, confusing the portable one with the non-portable. So i sent it back, and the portable will not be available until late March. Anyway, these little amps work wonderful, and this spring, i'll be in the meadows, listening to tapes through my Sony WM-D6 professional portable cassette deck, linked to the Portable micro amp, that will drive my HD 650!! One thing that i don't know, is that if the Total bithead amp (see up), a smaller, and more basic amp, would be abble to drive properly a 600 or 650. But for sure, the HD 555/Total bithead combo is awesome. Maybe the solution for you. |
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: January 26 2008 at 06:09 | ||
Holy Crap!!! |
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: January 26 2008 at 04:16 | ||
Glad to see you're an Agitation free fan. No, the 600 or 650 is not worth without headphone amp, but Headroom does excellent pure class A portable (or not)amps (20 h autonomy)that will drive wonderfully a 600 or 650: It costs 400 dollars: http://www.headphone.com/products/headphone-amps/the-micro-line/2007-headroom-portable-micro-amp.php |
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |