Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Where's The Who?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhere's The Who?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Where's The Who?
    Posted: July 19 2007 at 04:55
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Definitely not Ivan!Wink


Actually, I beg to differ, there will be more than enough messages of recommendations, once the Who widen yet another side of rock. Maybe not that much as we gotten used to (Zep, Maiden, Doors, Queen), and noot that everything will get accepted by that, only though that there will be hectic recommendations, of the "X is here, Y should too" type, just because that's a reasonably good fashion into it.

I have to accept myself, just like Ivan, the fact that they will be added, as I still think that 70 % of their music is far from progressive (pop rock or art pop during the early albums; straightforwards pop after By Numbers) and, in rest, there are only two accordingly progressive albums, by the concept they have.




right now...I guess it's next to accept and approve Metallica? Wink
Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2007 at 03:55
f**kin' A! Er, I mean, quite nice.
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
Evans View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2006
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3004 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2007 at 03:54
Wowhoo! :) Not sure i would include them if it were up to me, but i won't mind, the more the merrier, and itäs always good to get new recommendations and read about new albums.

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2007 at 03:45
Definitely not Ivan!Wink
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2007 at 22:23
Well, it's done so we have to accept it.
 
I just hope that now they are not be used as an excuse with the usual "If the Who are here why not X"
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2007 at 19:36

The What?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2007 at 19:23
Thanks for the great news! Thumbs%20Up
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2007 at 13:52
The Who have now been approved for addition as Proto Prog by M@x and the Admin team.
 
Micky will be coordinating the addition.
 
Any discussions on the Who shoudl now be in the Prog related and Proto Prog section.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 14:06
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

OK, I'll take it to the team. As it's the holiday season, the decision will take a bit longer than usual.Big%20smile


thanks Bob.. and no hurry... hell, I  think I started this discussion in the collab area back in January hahhaha.  Just let me know the verdict LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 14:04
OK, I'll take it to the team. As it's the holiday season, the decision will take a bit longer than usual.Big%20smile
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:51
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Do you want me to take the Who to the admin team (and probably M@x) for a decision? Is someone prepared to do the work of adding them if they are approved?


hahahha... as you know Bob... I'd love to do  the addition.  I think they fit best in proto...but that would be you alls call.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:50
I would want you to but I don't think I have the ability to add them if they are approved. Except maybe albums 
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:48
Do you want me to take the Who to the admin team (and probably M@x) for a decision? Is someone prepared to do the work of adding them if they are approved?
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:16
Originally posted by ghost_of_morphy ghost_of_morphy wrote:

After reading and thinking about the response to this question, I can't understand at all why anyone would not classify The Who as proto-prog.


that's what I've been saying for 6 months... but the answer is the obvious one.... we all see prog...and hahhaha... proto-prog differently. Still others refuse to look at them as anything than 70's hard rock legends.  To me it's a slam dunk...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:04
^ It's easy...because they don't want to.

I still would go for an affirmative for The Who.

Chris Squire was heavily influenced by John Entwistle's bass playing.

Rush were influenced by The Who's bass playing.

The Who released a few concept albums before the prog-rock movement in the 70's started.
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2007 at 15:23
After reading and thinking about the response to this question, I can't understand at all why anyone would not classify The Who as proto-prog.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 18:15
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Again, I think the crux of this ongoing additions problem is the vague, subjective nature of "prog" or "progressive" as a would-be means to classify widely diverse music forms and artists.
 
Despite what many here continue to post about 'true" or "actual" prog, we have no such broad agreement on the term's parameters. Thus, this issue will always bedevil the so-called "Prog" Archives, as long as such a vague term is used to (supposedly) say what we have here.
 



agreed again Peter.... and again... we just do the best we can with the site we do have.  If I could launch a cyber-coup and run M@X's underwear up the flagpole I would LOL. Until the opportunity presents itself... we goosestep to his drumbeat.



I thought "Max" was a lady not a gent....hence the underwear thing takes on quite a different complexionOuchOuch



hahhahah... oh Richard... you kill me .... this pic say everything you need to know about the current state of PA's LOLEmbarrassedAngryWink

http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=1
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12813 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 16:58
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Again, I think the crux of this ongoing additions problem is the vague, subjective nature of "prog" or "progressive" as a would-be means to classify widely diverse music forms and artists.
 
Despite what many here continue to post about 'true" or "actual" prog, we have no such broad agreement on the term's parameters. Thus, this issue will always bedevil the so-called "Prog" Archives, as long as such a vague term is used to (supposedly) say what we have here.
 



agreed again Peter.... and again... we just do the best we can with the site we do have.  If I could launch a cyber-coup and run M@X's underwear up the flagpole I would LOL. Until the opportunity presents itself... we goosestep to his drumbeat.



I thought "Max" was a lady not a gent....hence the underwear thing takes on quite a different complexionOuchOuch
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:26
Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Again, I think the crux of this ongoing additions problem is the vague, subjective nature of "prog" or "progressive" as a would-be means to classify widely diverse music forms and artists.
 
Despite what many here continue to post about 'true" or "actual" prog, we have no such broad agreement on the term's parameters. Thus, this issue will always bedevil the so-called "Prog" Archives, as long as such a vague term is used to (supposedly) say what we have here.
 



agreed again Peter.... and again... we just do the best we can with the site we do have.  If I could launch a cyber-coup and run M@X's underwear up the flagpole I would LOL. Until the opportunity presents itself... we goosestep to his drumbeat.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 12:54
Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Again, I think the crux of this ongoing additions problem is the vague, subjective nature of "prog" or "progressive" as a would-be means to classify widely diverse music forms and artists.
 
Despite what many here continue to post about 'true" or "actual" prog, we have no such broad agreement on the term's parameters. Thus, this issue will always bedevil the so-called "Prog" Archives, as long as such a vague term is used to (supposedly) say what we have here.
 
Prog is a "genre" in name only. It's an anachronistic, outmoded term, and currently, mostly a (hugely subjective) value judgment which basically equates to "good," "complex" or "interesting." Stern%20Smile
 
That's partially right, but I think we have to keep the Archives as ProgArchives; if we turn them into rockArchives (which, luckily, won't happen as the owners I'm prety sure don't intend on doing so) then we would have no way but to include EVERYTHING, from U2 to Aerosmith (Dead).... The "PROG" term, as vague and anachronistic as it is, is more helpful than, say, "Art Rock". What if we named this whole website the "Art Rock Archives"? Then an argument could be said that EVERY rock, good or not, is art as it's MUSIC, then we would end with Green Day on the Archives. As bad a term as PROG is, it's the only one that somehow redirects us to the source of all this: the prog of the 70's giants, all the genres that came after them and because of them, all the other genres of music that also tried to go beyond boundaries....
 
By the way, I haven't heard more than songs by The Who so I have no good opinion on the matter (the few I've heard of course are just vile pop/rock, the more popular ones)...But in keeping with the new spirit, I hope they're NOT added.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.