Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The ultimate headphones for portable use!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe ultimate headphones for portable use!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Topic: The ultimate headphones for portable use!
    Posted: December 09 2006 at 05:37
I just got a fresh set of Koss Spark Plugs. Cheap (16 euro) but amazingly clear sound and background isolation - especially compared to my Sony, Samsung and Philips in-ear headsets.
I wanted Sennheiser CX300s, but they were not available while these were. No regrets so far.Approve
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 11:10
I got my new Sennheiser for €70 ... I've been using them almost every day for the last 2 months, they're still as good as new.  
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
N Ellingworth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 10:38
clearance sale Big smile
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 08:48
If they were £6 new I can't see them being Sennheiser... I may be wrong?!
Back to Top
N Ellingworth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 06:49
I'm not sure, I only paid £6 for them so I didn't really care but you'd think that they'd last longer.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 05:31
^ falling apart ... what were you doing with them? 
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
enigma View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 04:49
the Shure customer service is superb Clap
Back to Top
N Ellingworth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 03:13
I once used a pair of Sennheiser in ear phones but despite great sound quality they weren't very strong and only lasted about a month before starting to fall apart, now when buying headphones for portable devices I look for strength rather than sound quality.

Anyway it's hard to reduce the quality of mp3s any further Wink
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2006 at 03:04

You maybe allude to Sennheiser PX100? Indeed, it's good for the price, with soft highs, but these are certainly not real good headphones. On another hand, the higher models in the same range (PX250, PX 300, etc...) are to avoid cause it features a noise cancelling system which make it sound bad; Other good references in the same price range has been quoted here, among which: "Grado SR 60" and "Koss Porta Pro", all great for the price.

For higher budget (100 to 300 dollars and more) turn to in ear models from Etymotic, Ultimates ears and Shure.




Back to Top
enigma View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 17:26
Another advantage of these type of phones is that they are 'fellow commuter' friendly. They are completely inaudible to those who aren't wearing them, so no 'tish-tic-shhhhh-tissss.....' to annoy those sitting next to you.
They are hearing friendly, less external noise = lower volume level. (This can also sometimes lead to longer battery life, depending on their current requirements).

Yes, you must take care when positioning them, and it does take practice to get the right fit and choose the right tip for you.

I have read that the lower end of the Ety range is supposed to have less pronounced bass compared with similar models from Shure, but with a more detailed open sound. I cannot vouch for this, but it is worth investigating the various makes to get a model which suits your tonal preference. These babies are expensive, so if possible, try before you buy (admittedly, some shops may have problems with you auditioning ear canal phones, but it is still worth a try - borrow a friends perhaps.)

For more info, check out http://www.head-fi.org/

At the lower end of the price bracket, Sennheiser do  a model that is supposed to be a good value upgrade to the standard buds.
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 14:12
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:


Well, your doctor was saying that about objects used to cure your ears, and he's true.

The major risk is rather eardrum damage, at high volume.

 
with these headphones being recommended by yourself, Olivier, i am very tempted to try them - watch this space!Confused
 
 
 
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 05:06
^ the risk for eardrum damage is not much greater than with other types of headphones ... in-ear headphones are closer to the ear, but also have much less power to start with.

Obviously you should reduce the volume if after listening for  about an hour you take off the headphones and your ears are ringing or your hearing capacity is reduced (can't hear high frequencies as well as usual). But to be on the safe side you need to turn the volume down a good deal more ... but with good in-ear headphones you don't need much volume anyway, because environmental noises are blocked out.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 04:01

Well, your doctor was saying that about objects used to cure your ears, and he's true.

The major risk is rather eardrum damage, at high volume.

Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 03:57

i've seen these on ebay for £63.00 or the whole kit  for £115.00. My doctor says you should put nothing sharper than your elbow in your ear,  but i would be willing to try them on approval -  will they take them back for a refund if they don't suit me???Confused

 
 
 


Edited by mystic fred - December 02 2006 at 04:03
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2006 at 03:26

330 $, 250 $ street price.
    
Indeed, "Shure" compete with "Etymotic research", along with "Ultimate ears" in the in-ear field.


    

Edited by oliverstoned - December 02 2006 at 03:36
Back to Top
enigma View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2006 at 19:25
I use Shure's entry level E2C with my iPod, and they are great noise isolation phones.
Soundwise, not as good as my Grado SR60's, but miles better than the standard Apple phones.

The yellow foam tips provide the best fit for me.

How much are the Etymotic's? I know the top end Shures are around £300, which is crazy money.
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2006 at 17:13
The looks of those are very simple, and that appeals to me. I'm tired of cheap headphones attempting to look advanced and futuristic but mostly failing miserably at both points. But I don't really like wearing in-ear headphones with the kind of eartips these have got. They may keep noise from the surroundings out, but I don't like having a piece of foam/rubber (or whatever they're made of) in my ears. Feels uncomfortable.

I prefer using a normal, large headphones. It's more comfortable, even if some noise leaks in, a sacrifice I am willing to make on short journeys. 
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Online
Points: 20345
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2006 at 13:36
^^^ good, I'll remember that next time I go Jogging, Mike...
 
...like sometime in the next life....LOL
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2006 at 13:34
I'm a really big fan of the in-ear concept ... it has many advantages. The headphones are very small, lightweight, and they consume very little energy, because they're so near to the ear that the volume they have to generate is much lower. And the air-tight seal of the ear canal means that environmental sounds are much reduced - not as efficiently as with active noise-cancelling headphones, but much more than the conventional walkman headphones. And you can use them while jogging without them falling out of your ears, as conventional headphones do (I mean those hook-like devices that you just "hang" on your ear).
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Online
Points: 20345
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2006 at 13:21
maybe he's changed his mind...
 
...but I'm not about to read thru his post to find out...Sleepy
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.227 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.