![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Angelo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
![]() Posted: December 09 2006 at 05:37 |
I just got a fresh set of Koss Spark Plugs. Cheap (16 euro) but amazingly clear sound and background isolation - especially compared to my Sony, Samsung and Philips in-ear headsets.
I wanted Sennheiser CX300s, but they were not available while these were. No regrets so far. ![]() |
|
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|
![]() |
|
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21598 |
![]() |
I got my new Sennheiser for €70 ... I've been using them almost every day for the last 2 months, they're still as good as new.
|
|
![]() |
|
N Ellingworth ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 17 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1324 |
![]() |
clearance sale
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
goose ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
![]() |
If they were £6 new I can't see them being Sennheiser... I may be wrong?!
|
|
![]() |
|
N Ellingworth ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 17 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1324 |
![]() |
I'm not sure, I only paid £6 for them so I didn't really care but you'd think that they'd last longer.
|
|
![]() |
|
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21598 |
![]() |
^ falling apart ... what were you doing with them?
|
|
![]() |
|
enigma ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 12 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() |
the Shure customer service is superb
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
N Ellingworth ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 17 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1324 |
![]() |
I once used a pair of Sennheiser in ear phones but despite great sound quality they weren't very strong and only lasted about a month before starting to fall apart, now when buying headphones for portable devices I look for strength rather than sound quality.
Anyway it's hard to reduce the quality of mp3s any further ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
You maybe allude to Sennheiser PX100? Indeed, it's good for the price, with soft highs, but these are certainly not real good headphones. On another hand, the higher models in the same range (PX250, PX 300, etc...) are to avoid cause it features a noise cancelling system which make it sound bad; Other good references in the same price range has been quoted here, among which: "Grado SR 60" and "Koss Porta Pro", all great for the price. For higher budget (100 to 300 dollars and more) turn to in ear models from Etymotic, Ultimates ears and Shure. |
|
![]() |
|
enigma ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 12 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() |
Another advantage of these type of phones is that they are 'fellow commuter' friendly. They are completely inaudible to those who aren't wearing them, so no 'tish-tic-shhhhh-tissss.....' to annoy those sitting next to you.
They are hearing friendly, less external noise = lower volume level. (This can also sometimes lead to longer battery life, depending on their current requirements). Yes, you must take care when positioning them, and it does take practice to get the right fit and choose the right tip for you. I have read that the lower end of the Ety range is supposed to have less pronounced bass compared with similar models from Shure, but with a more detailed open sound. I cannot vouch for this, but it is worth investigating the various makes to get a model which suits your tonal preference. These babies are expensive, so if possible, try before you buy (admittedly, some shops may have problems with you auditioning ear canal phones, but it is still worth a try - borrow a friends perhaps.) For more info, check out http://www.head-fi.org/ At the lower end of the price bracket, Sennheiser do a model that is supposed to be a good value upgrade to the standard buds. |
|
![]() |
|
mystic fred ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
![]() |
with these headphones being recommended by yourself, Olivier, i am very tempted to try them - watch this space!
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21598 |
![]() |
^ the risk for eardrum damage is not much greater than with other types of headphones ... in-ear headphones are closer to the ear, but also have much less power to start with.
Obviously you should reduce the volume if after listening for about an hour you take off the headphones and your ears are ringing or your hearing capacity is reduced (can't hear high frequencies as well as usual). But to be on the safe side you need to turn the volume down a good deal more ... but with good in-ear headphones you don't need much volume anyway, because environmental noises are blocked out. |
|
![]() |
|
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
Well, your doctor was saying that about objects used to cure your ears, and he's true. The major risk is rather eardrum damage, at high volume. |
|
![]() |
|
mystic fred ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
![]() |
i've seen these on ebay for £63.00 or the whole kit for £115.00. My doctor says you should put nothing sharper than your elbow in your ear, but i would be willing to try them on approval - will they take them back for a refund if they don't suit me??? Edited by mystic fred - December 02 2006 at 04:03 |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
330 $, 250 $ street price. Indeed, "Shure" compete with "Etymotic research", along with "Ultimate ears" in the in-ear field. Edited by oliverstoned - December 02 2006 at 03:36 |
|
![]() |
|
enigma ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 12 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() |
I use Shure's entry level E2C with my iPod, and they are great noise isolation phones.
Soundwise, not as good as my Grado SR60's, but miles better than the standard Apple phones. The yellow foam tips provide the best fit for me. How much are the Etymotic's? I know the top end Shures are around £300, which is crazy money. |
|
![]() |
|
Philéas ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
![]() |
The looks of those are very simple, and that appeals to me. I'm tired
of cheap headphones attempting to look advanced and futuristic but
mostly failing miserably at both points. But I don't really like
wearing in-ear headphones with the kind of eartips these have got. They
may keep noise from the surroundings out, but I don't like having a
piece of foam/rubber (or whatever they're made of) in my ears. Feels
uncomfortable.
I prefer using a normal, large headphones. It's more comfortable, even if some noise leaks in, a sacrifice I am willing to make on short journeys. |
|
![]() |
|
Jared ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Online Points: 20345 |
![]() |
^^^ good, I'll remember that next time I go Jogging, Mike...
...like sometime in the next life....
![]() |
|
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
|
![]() |
|
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21598 |
![]() |
I'm a really big fan of the in-ear concept ... it has many advantages. The headphones are very small, lightweight, and they consume very little energy, because they're so near to the ear that the volume they have to generate is much lower. And the air-tight seal of the ear canal means that environmental sounds are much reduced - not as efficiently as with active noise-cancelling headphones, but much more than the conventional walkman headphones. And you can use them while jogging without them falling out of your ears, as conventional headphones do (I mean those hook-like devices that you just "hang" on your ear).
|
|
![]() |
|
Jared ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Online Points: 20345 |
![]() |
maybe he's changed his mind...
...but I'm not about to read thru his post to find out...
![]() |
|
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |