Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - On the home page...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedOn the home page...
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
toolsofthetrade View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: On the home page...
    Posted: November 15 2006 at 15:05
has it got something to do with the term embargo in international commerce and politics, where an embargo is the prohibition of commerce and trade with a certain country, in order to isolate it and to put its government into a difficult internal situation, given that the effects of the embargo are often able to make its economy suffer from the initiative?

less economy...loot(money)...is that it?
Back to Top
toolsofthetrade View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 15:01
Embargo! (go figure it out)

....ograbme? i don't get it...
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 14:41
LOL
sig
Back to Top
eugene View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 2703 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 14:40
Originally posted by Chris Stacey Chris Stacey wrote:

I think you guys have way too much time on your hands!!!!Stern Smile
 
LOL that's true
carefulwiththataxe
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 14:26
I think you guys have way too much time on your hands!!!!Stern Smile
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 13:15
I like Ricochet's suggestion.
 
On a side note, toolsofthetrade, Tool may be loot backwards...
 
BUT!
 
 
 
 
 
Embargo! (go figure it out)
Back to Top
toolsofthetrade View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 10:01
`Hey, isn't this a case of the pot blaming the kettle?'
 
That was intentional. A little joke.
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 09:49
Originally posted by toolsofthetrade toolsofthetrade wrote:

 it's  superflous and isn't needed


Hey, isn't this a case of the pot blaming the kettle?
    
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 09:43
this is a site improvement issue.


and I disagree, at such a valued number, I see no problem in "exactly" or "specifically" pointing out how many bands are we dealing.

suggestion: "x.xxx and counting" instead of "exactly x.xxx"?
Back to Top
Firepuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 657 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 09:38
You are correct, in this context the work 'exactly' is redundant.
The 'As of today...' should remain as is but it wouldn't bother me if 'exactly' is removed. In truth, it doesn't bother me that it is there either...
Kryten : "'Pub'? Ah yes, A meeting place where humans attempt to achieve advanced states of mental incompetence by the repeated consumption of fermented vegetable drinks."
Back to Top
toolsofthetrade View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2006 at 09:17
...it says `As of today, the discography lists 12,872 titles from exactly 2,549 bands'
 
...i'm not to fond of the `exactly' put in there...it's  superflous and isn't needed and draws attention from us obsessive pedants. It would be needed if, say, the number of bands was like a round number, like 2,500, but of course its not going to be like `2,549 and a half bands'
 
If it has been put in place to show how good prog archives is at keeping track of the number of bands that are listed in it, kinda like `oh yeah we're so clever we know the exact number of bands on our website' can i suggest that it be re-phrased to something like - `the exact number on bands listed on prog archives, as of today, is 2,549. This still has the same effect but it sounds better.
 
Thankyou!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.