Signatures |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
PROGMAN
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 03 2004 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 2664 |
Topic: Signatures Posted: August 12 2006 at 20:28 |
||
MPEG4 files may not be compatible with all plug ins, cause usually you need a Quicktime player to do that, however if you have VideoLAN a media player, it does a lot of things ranging from MP4, DVD, MP3 etc all in one package no need to get extra codecs really.
K-Lite Codec, good if you want to play MP4 in Windows Media Player etc and much more. |
|||
CYMRU AM BYTH
|
|||
PROGMAN
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 03 2004 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 2664 |
Posted: August 12 2006 at 20:24 | ||
I think Web Wiz Forums only go to max 200 character by default.
I could be wrong. |
|||
CYMRU AM BYTH
|
|||
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: August 10 2006 at 09:59 | ||
I can't possibly imagine such a thing. The memory of a sig is maintained strictly to the present time and to the present form of your sig. It's not about the posts of the pasts, it's not even about posts, it's about you, the member, what the sig represents. So when you do the change of sigs, perfectly natural is to cope everywhere, anywhere with that sig... (that or I'm really tired and can't understand entirely the issue...) |
|||
|
|||
crimson thing
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 28 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 848 |
Posted: August 10 2006 at 09:55 | ||
One other point about signatures - if you change your sig, all previous sigs get changed, yea, even back to the dawn of time (or whenever you started posting here, whichever is the later ) - which is a bit irritating, if you change sigs every now & then out of boredom. Is this an unavoidable quirk of the forum software, or is it possible to set it so that past sigs are fixed, and only future ones change?
|
|||
"Every man over forty is a scoundrel." GBS
|
|||
d.o.k
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 17 2005 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 113 |
Posted: August 09 2006 at 19:35 | ||
Indeed, huge signatures are VERY borring.
Strangely, avatar cannot exceed 64x64 pixels while it could be... let's say 150x150, but signatures with picture or huge details of what people are listening (like lastfm...) are so annoying. Sadly, it is impossible to deactivate the loading of signatures in the settings |
|||
my band : http://lgab.tk
|
|||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20248 |
Posted: July 15 2006 at 04:52 | ||
Are the reviews not made for that? Do you need to review albums in your sig?
Short and concise is best Edited by Sean Trane - July 15 2006 at 04:52 |
|||
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|||
Trickster F.
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 10 2006 Location: Belize Status: Offline Points: 5308 |
Posted: July 13 2006 at 11:27 | ||
You can not really describe an album in 50-75 words, no matter how much you try.
-- Ivan
|
|||
sig
|
|||
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 06 2006 Location: AČ Michigan Status: Offline Points: 5109 |
Posted: July 12 2006 at 23:26 | ||
Sometimes less is more. |
|||
The Wizard
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 18 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7341 |
Posted: July 12 2006 at 13:45 | ||
I wist the text limit could be increased, but that's just me.
|
|||
|
|||
Ghandi 2
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 17 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1494 |
Posted: July 12 2006 at 13:43 | ||
I wouldn't mind having text only signatures, but the character limit should be increased. I made my grammar sig into an image because I didn't have the room to say everything I wanted to say in 200 characters. However, I would be fine with it just being text if I had enough room. It would be nice if the image restrictions were a bit tighter. (I know this sounds somewhat ridiculous with my current sig, but I like that picture, and it's a tribute to Syd. I wouldn't mind reducing it if I had to, but since I don't have to I'm not going to.)
|
|||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: July 12 2006 at 12:50 | ||
Aaron's concern re photos of scantily clad women suddenly appearing on his work (or even home) computer is real, and completely legitimate, as anyone with much work experience (or even a modicum of intuition) would know. Whether we like viewing attactive human bodies is one thing, but having them unpredictably appear on a music forum is quite another.
(Thus I wouldn't view the "eye candy" thread at work, but I should not be afraid to view a thread on Pink Floyd for fear of encountering pics of people in their underwear (swimsuits).
If I want to view such things, on my own time, and in privacy, I can readily do so via other sites devoted to just that purpose.
And yes, huge sig pics are rather silly, borderline rude re "netiquette" and boring, for me (the Garfield cartoon, etc, might be amusing to view once).
|
|||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|||
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: July 10 2006 at 19:06 | ||
On most message boards there's an option to hide everyone's signature, and I use it without fail. I never like scrolling past the same thing over and over!
|
|||
Trickster F.
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 10 2006 Location: Belize Status: Offline Points: 5308 |
Posted: July 10 2006 at 08:11 | ||
I'm not perverted, I just happen to like women, much like most other men.
-- Ivan
|
|||
sig
|
|||
Tony R
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
Posted: July 07 2006 at 19:32 | ||
I agree with Aaron.
These big signatures are just plain irritating.However I think the Last FM style playlists,whilst a tad "clunky" are obviously apt for this type of forum. Frosty's old sig pics gave me the creeps though... |
|||
aapatsos
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 11 2005 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 9226 |
Posted: July 07 2006 at 19:27 | ||
I liked your Immortal one |
|||
Empathy
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1864 |
Posted: July 05 2006 at 16:54 | ||
Sure, but NO WALRUSES! |
|||
Pure Brilliance:
|
|||
Aaron
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 08 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 395 |
Posted: July 05 2006 at 16:26 | ||
you didn't have to take it down Ivan, that is up to you unless the board rules change, although i do appreciate it, i didn't PM you because for one i don't generally PM anybody and two i was just using yours as an example, there are others Aaron
|
|||
Vompatti
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: October 22 2005 Location: elsewhere Status: Offline Points: 67407 |
Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:58 | ||
A short film as a signature would be nice.
|
|||
NutterAlert
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 07 2005 Location: In transition Status: Offline Points: 2808 |
Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:30 | ||
i've PM'ed the site owners asking if we can have flash, MPEG4 or IPTV feeds for our sig's.....then we could really ramp it up a notch or two.
|
|||
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
|
|||
Trickster F.
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 10 2006 Location: Belize Status: Offline Points: 5308 |
Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:26 | ||
This is such a gay thread(...), but okay, I completely understand your point of view and I shall change my signature. There really is no specific rule about this on the website, and I personally see why you wouldn't just PM me, asking to change the signature, instead of raising a discussion that many people found confusing.
Mind you, beside you the reaction to the new signature was especially great.
-- Ivan Edited by ivansfr0st - July 05 2006 at 11:35 |
|||
sig
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |