Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Signatures
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSignatures

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Signatures
    Posted: August 12 2006 at 20:28
MPEG4 files may not be compatible with all plug ins, cause usually you need a Quicktime player to do that, however if you have VideoLAN a media player, it does a lot of things ranging from MP4, DVD, MP3 etc all in one package no need to get extra codecs really.

K-Lite Codec, good if you want to play MP4 in Windows Media Player etc and much more.
CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2006 at 20:24
I think Web Wiz Forums only go to max 200 character by default.

I could be wrong.
CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 09:59
Originally posted by crimson thing crimson thing wrote:

One other point about signatures - if you change your sig, all previous sigs get changed, yea, even back to the dawn of time (or whenever you started posting here, whichever is the later Wink ) - which is a bit irritating, if you change sigs every now & then out of boredom. Is this an unavoidable quirk of the forum software, or is it possible to set it so that past sigs are fixed, and only future ones change?


I can't possibly imagine such a thing. The memory of a sig is maintained strictly to the present time and to the present form of your sig. It's not about the posts of the pasts, it's not even about posts, it's about you, the member, what the sig represents. So when you do the change of sigs, perfectly natural is to cope everywhere, anywhere with that sig...

(that or I'm really tired and can't understand entirely the issue...Sleepy)

Back to Top
crimson thing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 28 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 09:55
One other point about signatures - if you change your sig, all previous sigs get changed, yea, even back to the dawn of time (or whenever you started posting here, whichever is the later Wink ) - which is a bit irritating, if you change sigs every now & then out of boredom. Is this an unavoidable quirk of the forum software, or is it possible to set it so that past sigs are fixed, and only future ones change?
"Every man over forty is a scoundrel." GBS
Back to Top
d.o.k View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2006 at 19:35
Indeed, huge signatures are VERY borring.
Strangely, avatar cannot exceed 64x64 pixels while it could be... let's say 150x150, but signatures with picture or huge details of what people are listening (like lastfm...) are so annoying.Thumbs Down

Sadly, it is impossible to deactivate the loading of signatures in the settings Unhappy
my band : http://lgab.tk
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2006 at 04:52
Originally posted by ivansfr0st ivansfr0st wrote:

Originally posted by bhikkhu bhikkhu wrote:

Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

I wist the text limit could be increased, but that's just me.

    
Sometimes less is more.
 
You can not really describe an album in 50-75 words, no matter how much you try.
 
 -- Ivan
 
 
 
Are the reviews not made for that? Do you need to review albums in your sig?
 
 
Short and concise is best


Edited by Sean Trane - July 15 2006 at 04:52
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2006 at 11:27
Originally posted by bhikkhu bhikkhu wrote:

Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

I wist the text limit could be increased, but that's just me.

    
Sometimes less is more.
 
You can not really describe an album in 50-75 words, no matter how much you try.
 
 -- Ivan
sig
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2006 at 23:26
Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

I wist the text limit could be increased, but that's just me.

    
Sometimes less is more.
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2006 at 13:45
I wist the text limit could be increased, but that's just me.
Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2006 at 13:43
I wouldn't mind having text only signatures, but the character limit should be increased. I made my grammar sig into an image because I didn't have the room to say everything I wanted to say in 200 characters. However, I would be fine with it just being text if I had enough room. It would be nice if the image restrictions were a bit tighter. (I know this sounds somewhat ridiculous with my current sig, but I like that picture, and it's a tribute to Syd. I wouldn't mind reducing it if I had to, but since I don't have to I'm not going to.)
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2006 at 12:50

Aaron's concern re photos of scantily clad women suddenly appearing on his work (or even home) computer is real, and completely legitimate, as anyone with much work experience (or even a modicum of intuition) would know.Stern Smile

Whether we like viewing attactive human bodies is one thing, but having them unpredictably appear on a music forum is quite another.
 
(Thus I wouldn't view the "eye candy" thread at work, but I should not be afraid to view a thread on Pink Floyd for fear of encountering pics of people in their underwear (swimsuits).
 
If I want to view such things, on my own time, and in privacy, I can readily do so via other sites devoted to just that purpose.Smile
 
 
 
And yes, huge sig pics are rather silly, borderline rude re "netiquette" and boring, for me (the Garfield cartoon, etc,  might be amusing to view once).
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2006 at 19:06
On most message boards there's an option to hide everyone's signature, and I use it without fail. I never like scrolling past the same thing over and over!
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2006 at 08:11
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:


plus how can someone think you are a perv when it isn't you with the babe picture (let them think ivan's a perv LOL)
 
I'm not perverted, I just happen to like women, much like most other men.
 
 -- Ivan
sig
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2006 at 19:32
I agree with Aaron.

These big signatures are just plain irritating.However I think the Last FM style playlists,whilst a tad "clunky" are obviously apt for this type of forum.

Frosty's old sig pics gave me the creeps though...
Back to Top
aapatsos View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2006 at 19:27
Originally posted by ivansfr0st ivansfr0st wrote:

This is such a gay thread([IMG]height=17 alt=LOL src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17 align=absMiddle>...), but okay, I completely understand your point of view and I shall change my signature. There really is no specific rule about this on the website, and I personally see why you wouldn't just PM me, asking to change the signature, instead of raising a discussion that many people found confusing. 
 

Mind you, beside you the reaction to the new signature was especially great. [IMG]height=17 alt=Tongue src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" width=17 align=absMiddle>

 

 -- Ivan


I liked your Immortal one
     
Back to Top
Empathy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 16:54
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

A short film as a signature would be nice. Wink


LOL

Sure, but NO WALRUSES! Angry

Wink



Pure Brilliance:
Back to Top
Aaron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 16:26

you didn't have to take it down Ivan, that is up to you unless the board rules change, although i do appreciate it, i didn't PM you because for one i don't generally PM anybody and two i was just using yours as an example, there are others

Aaron
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67407
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:58
A short film as a signature would be nice. Wink
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:30
i've PM'ed the site owners asking if we can have flash, MPEG4 or IPTV feeds for our sig's.....then we could really ramp it up a notch or two.
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 11:26
This is such a gay thread(LOL...), but okay, I completely understand your point of view and I shall change my signature. There really is no specific rule about this on the website, and I personally see why you wouldn't just PM me, asking to change the signature, instead of raising a discussion that many people found confusing. 
 
Mind you, beside you the reaction to the new signature was especially great. Tongue
 
 -- Ivan


Edited by ivansfr0st - July 05 2006 at 11:35
sig
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.