Is Pink Floyd prog rock? |
Post Reply | Page 123 15> |
Author | |||
Moyan
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 29 2024 Location: Suffex Status: Offline Points: 1219 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: April 17 2024 at 03:01 |
||
As far as I know, Pink Floyd was a legendary psychedelic rock band before they made the switch to dreamy art rock. They were never considered a progressive rock group back in the late 1960s and early 1970s, which is to say, during the original progressive rock period.
|
|||
Skymachine_119
Forum Newbie Joined: August 27 2023 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 12 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5986 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Like all bands born before prog, they evolved. In my opinion, Initially they played psychedelic pop music, then they delved into psychedelia with Ummagumma and then came to prog, in the wake of other bands (VdGG also started with psychedelia, as did Family) The beginning of prog was marked by King Crimson in 1969, and in 1970 VdGG, Genesis, Gentle Giant, EL&P and Pink Floyd (thanks to the Atom Heart Mother suite) and many others came to prog (Family and Yes got there in 1971). 1970 is the most genuine and naive year in the birth/development of prog, and perhaps that is why it's my favourite. PF remained inside prog until Animals, 1977. Their most proggy album is Wish You Were Here. Then they became Roger Waters' orchestral folk band, until they tried to return to prog with Gilmour.
|
|||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
|||
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: June 18 2009 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 12732 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
No wonder those are my two favourite albums. |
|||
Moonshake
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 16 2022 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 890 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes, they are. Absolutely.
|
|||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Offline Points: 43612 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
|
|||
Progishness
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2020 Location: Planet Rhubarb Status: Offline Points: 2565 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
^ My point exactly. Classic Rock & Roll was influenced by / developed from several genres, including Rhythm & Blues / Jump Blues / Swing / Jazz / Country / Gospel / Boogie Woogie - which are apparent to a greater or lesser extent in classic 50's R&R songs, and by extension into 1960's psychedelia and into 1970's prog rock & hard rock... and beyond. The Floyd may have started out as a blues band but their style quickly morphed into psychedelia, and eventually developed into space rock... and beyond.
|
|||
"We're going to need a bigger swear jar."
Chloë Grace Moretz as Mindy McCready aka 'Hit Girl' in Kick-Ass 2 |
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't think anyone is actually saying Floyd is not progressive rock, or should not be considered prog. The fact they started as blues certainly does not disqualify them. The blues is rock-- it is Psych, it is Heavy Metal, it is Prog. Edited by Atavachron - August 18 2023 at 21:06 |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
Mellotron Storm
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 27 2006 Location: The Beach Status: Offline Points: 13489 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I consider them Psychedelic but my wheelhouse for them is 1968 to 1973 and I know there's so much more. Progressive for sure!
|
|||
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN |
|||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13054 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Jethro Tull started as a blues band as well, and...oh look, they released TAAB and APP. The argument is asinine. I guess Yes was country because Steve Howe emulates and worships Chet Atkins.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
Frets N Worries
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 30 2023 Location: Your Basement Status: Offline Points: 4202 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
At this rate we should just make an entire section of the website dedicated to this topic....
|
|||
The Wheel of Time Turns, and Ages come and pass. What was, what will be, and what is, may yet fall under the shadow.
Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time... |
|||
Necrotica
Special Collaborator Honorary Colaborator Joined: July 28 2015 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 3365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Never understood this argument tbh. I think the reason it resurfaces so much is because of Pink Floyd's relative lack of virtuosity. But if we were to use that criteria, we'd have to throw so many other bands out too. But they have every other hallmark of 70s prog. Lengthy epic pieces, sonic innovation, odd time sigs, complex arrangments, all that good stuff
Edited by Necrotica - August 18 2023 at 16:48 |
|||
Take me down, to the underground
Won't you take me down, to the underground Why oh why, there is no light And if I can't sleep, can you hold my life https://www.youtube.com/@CocoonMasterBrendan-wh3sd |
|||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It's not a precise science, and there's a certain overlap, but genre terms have their limits as well.
Atom Heart Mother, Meddle, Wish You Were Here, and Animals are unambiguously prog rock. Even with the narrowest, most nit-picky definition of prog rock, they're prog rock. For the other albums of the 70's you could make the argument they're perhaps closer to art rock, and their 60's stuff I'd all classify as psychedelic rock. This discussion pops up once in a while online, and there's often a couple of the same arguments going on that really make no sense to me... What does the fact that prog and art rock weren't fully defined yet and meant the same thing in the 70's have to do with anything? We're not in the 70's anymore, and I don't ever see people bring this up with any other band (I mean, it'd apply to every prog band if it'd apply to PF). What does the fact that Pink Floyd is more popular in the mainstream than any other prog band have to do with anything? Animals isn't a prog rock album because Another Brick in the Wall 2 is a radio staple? What does the fact that they started out as this-and-that and where inspired by blablabla matter? Few bands that exist for longer than a few years stick with one style their entire career. If you want to argue genres, stick with the actual music at hand. The actual music contained on the albums is what determines their genre. And yeah I know it's a pointless topic to argue about, but f**k it, I didn't bump the thread.
|
|||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I always found some of Gilmour's guitar work rather bluesy. F.e. the "Funky Dung" section of Atom Heart Mother - or the solo in Shine On You Crazy Diamond. That being said, I don't really buy the argument, that prog can't have blues elements. It would exclude ELP's version of Pictures of an Exhibition for instance...
|
|||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
I have to say, I find it amazing how long this discussion can be drawn. Prog is just a term invented by someone to describe some music. It is not a precise science. Pink Floyd is Pink Floyd, regardless of how you want to categorize them.
|
|||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18265 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
^WYWH is full blown symphonic prog too then.
|
|||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Is this a question that really needs to be asked? Of course they are progressive. Probably closer to crossover prog in many cases but Animals is full blown symphonic prog. Pink Floyd is the perfect example of where art rock and prog meet.
|
|||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13627 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Indeed, virtually all of the artists and acts we knew and loved so much in the 1970's started off as blues artists in the British R&B boom of the mid to late sixties.
|
|||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
TexasKing is absolutely correct. In fact Floyd started as a blues band, so learn some history and get your facts.
|
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18265 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I think this person is trying to imply that prog can't be blues based. I personally don't hear a whole lot of blues in PF. Sure there's some maybe but they went way beyond that.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 123 15> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |