Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
progmatic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2009
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 1785
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 06:42 |
Harbour of Tears is fantastic as well.
|
PROGMATIC
|
|
dougmcauliffe
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2019
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3895
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 06:23 |
LAM-SGC wrote:
In my world
The Snow Goose Moonmadness Mirage
...or as I call it The Snow Madness Mirage, which I have experienced in Sweden, blinded by the winter light on snow covered roads and swerving for vehicles that aren't there.
| Here’s one you don’t often hear: Moonmadness Rajaz Mirage Snow Goose Nod and a Wink Debut Nude All excellent
|
The sun has left the sky... ...Now you can close your eyes
|
|
progaardvark
Collaborator
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams
Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 50937
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 05:49 |
ForestFriend wrote:
It's nothing more than a computer generated list. It shows albums that are generally universally loved, which also means that riskier or controversial albums are likely to be left out. Since experimentation and risk-taking are so important in the genre, this does mean that some important artists like Soft Machine or Captain Beefheart do get left out on the basis that they can be too experimental to resonate with many people (and there's nothing wrong with not enjoying these artists - prog isn't a competition to listen to the most experimental music). |
It would be cool if there were some way to take the standard deviation of all the ratings. I believe the higher the standard deviation, the more the ratings are spread out over the 1 to 5 ratings spectrum. Then it's conceivable we could have a list of the top 100 (or some other number) controversial albums. I think that would be an interesting list to explore.
|
---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43519
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 04:08 |
thief wrote:
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
1. Perhaps. I don't remember the exact date when Prog Related filled with Bowies and Sabbaths, but I'm almost sure it wasn't that way ~15 years ago or so, when I started lurking here.
2. Wait, so you're telling me that hardly progressive Tool gets more votes than Cynic because it's less "metal" - even though three subgenres dedicated solely to Metal? (Tech/Extreme, Progressive, Experimental/Post) It's like we had muscle cars fanclub (showing off classic Camaros, Chargers, Shelbys) and didn't appreciate a guy driving 2020 SRT Hellcat since it's "too extreme"... but in the same time accepted a hillbilly with 1994 Ford Ranger, which has nothing to do with muscle cars in the first place?!
That's terrible.
|
Black Sabbath has been on PA for more than 10 years, definitely. I think Bowie was one of the last ones added to PA, still quite a while ago.
Like I said, progressive metal, extreme/tech prog metal or post metal have few fans left around. In fact, if I want to find out about new prog metal releases and bands, PA is no longer the main resource for me.
|
Meh. What's done can't be undone. I guess we'd be much better off without ~5-6 subgenres featured in here. I agree that some Metal lists here scream "2009!!!" so it's better to look elsewhere.
|
No, this is not what I meant, the subgenres are fine.
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39936
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 04:08 |
Kate Bush and David Bowie are two of the more eclectic inclusions on ProgArchives because neither of those artists are generally regarded as Progressive Rock, but I'm glad they're both here anyway.
|
|
thief
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:59 |
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
1. Perhaps. I don't remember the exact date when Prog Related filled with Bowies and Sabbaths, but I'm almost sure it wasn't that way ~15 years ago or so, when I started lurking here.
2. Wait, so you're telling me that hardly progressive Tool gets more votes than Cynic because it's less "metal" - even though three subgenres dedicated solely to Metal? (Tech/Extreme, Progressive, Experimental/Post) It's like we had muscle cars fanclub (showing off classic Camaros, Chargers, Shelbys) and didn't appreciate a guy driving 2020 SRT Hellcat since it's "too extreme"... but in the same time accepted a hillbilly with 1994 Ford Ranger, which has nothing to do with muscle cars in the first place?!
That's terrible.
|
Black Sabbath has been on PA for more than 10 years, definitely. I think Bowie was one of the last ones added to PA, still quite a while ago.
Like I said, progressive metal, extreme/tech prog metal or post metal have few fans left around. In fact, if I want to find out about new prog metal releases and bands, PA is no longer the main resource for me.
| Meh. What's done can't be undone. I guess we'd be much better off without ~5-6 subgenres featured in here. I agree that some Metal lists here scream "2009!!!" so it's better to look elsewhere.
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43519
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:55 |
thief wrote:
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
1. Perhaps. I don't remember the exact date when Prog Related filled with Bowies and Sabbaths, but I'm almost sure it wasn't that way ~15 years ago or so, when I started lurking here.
2. Wait, so you're telling me that hardly progressive Tool gets more votes than Cynic because it's less "metal" - even though three subgenres dedicated solely to Metal? (Tech/Extreme, Progressive, Experimental/Post) It's like we had muscle cars fanclub (showing off classic Camaros, Chargers, Shelbys) and didn't appreciate a guy driving 2020 SRT Hellcat since it's "too extreme"... but in the same time accepted a hillbilly with 1994 Ford Ranger, which has nothing to do with muscle cars in the first place?!
That's terrible.
|
Black Sabbath has been on PA for more than 10 years, definitely. I think Bowie was one of the last ones added to PA, still quite a while ago.
Like I said, progressive metal, extreme/tech prog metal or post metal have few fans left around. In fact, if I want to find out about new prog metal releases and bands, PA is no longer the main resource for me.
|
|
thief
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:46 |
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I'm no different than half of the users here. Miles Davis shouldn't be on Progarchives. Perhaps including jazz-rock/fusion as a whole was a mistake, since the site doesn't differentiate between In a Silent Way, Kind of Blue and, say, You're Under Arrest. Maybe we should do without Herbie Hancock, Weather Report or even Romantic Warrior, with all due respect.
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
1. Perhaps. I don't remember the exact date when Prog Related filled with Bowies and Sabbaths, but I'm almost sure it wasn't that way ~15 years ago or so, when I started lurking here.
2. Wait, so you're telling me that hardly progressive Tool gets more votes than Cynic because it's less "metal" - even though three subgenres dedicated solely to Metal? (Tech/Extreme, Progressive, Experimental/Post) It's like we had muscle cars fanclub (showing off classic Camaros, Chargers, Shelbys) and didn't appreciate a guy driving 2020 SRT Hellcat since it's "too extreme"... but in the same time accepted a hillbilly with 1994 Ford Ranger, which has nothing to do with muscle cars in the first place?!
That's terrible.
Edited by thief - February 20 2020 at 03:47
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39936
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:31 |
^^ All I'm saying is I don't have any gripes with the PA Top 100 because they're the albums that PA members have voted for, even if they're not all Progressive Rock.
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43519
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:28 |
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I'm no different than half of the users here. Miles Davis shouldn't be on Progarchives. Perhaps including jazz-rock/fusion as a whole was a mistake, since the site doesn't differentiate between In a Silent Way, Kind of Blue and, say, You're Under Arrest. Maybe we should do without Herbie Hancock, Weather Report or even Romantic Warrior, with all due respect.
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
I like Neo-Prog. |
you are not helping...
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39936
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:24 |
Cristi wrote:
thief wrote:
I'm no different than half of the users here. Miles Davis shouldn't be on Progarchives. Perhaps including jazz-rock/fusion as a whole was a mistake, since the site doesn't differentiate between In a Silent Way, Kind of Blue and, say, You're Under Arrest. Maybe we should do without Herbie Hancock, Weather Report or even Romantic Warrior, with all due respect.
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
I like Neo-Prog.
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43519
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:16 |
thief wrote:
I'm no different than half of the users here. Miles Davis shouldn't be on Progarchives. Perhaps including jazz-rock/fusion as a whole was a mistake, since the site doesn't differentiate between In a Silent Way, Kind of Blue and, say, You're Under Arrest. Maybe we should do without Herbie Hancock, Weather Report or even Romantic Warrior, with all due respect.
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
Nothing's been added to prog related for years.
Tool is rated higher than those albums you mentioned because Tool appeals to non-metalheads. And in recent years, progressive metal has become the most disliked prog subgenre around here. Along with neo-prog.
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39936
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:16 |
I'm perfectly happy to have Jazz-Rock/Fusion included on ProgArchives, otherwise we wouldn't have Santana here.
|
|
Frenetic Zetetic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:08 |
The way I look at it, prog anything is going to attract picky personalities.
|
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
|
|
thief
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 03:07 |
I'm no different than half of the users here. Miles Davis shouldn't be on Progarchives. Perhaps including jazz-rock/fusion as a whole was a mistake, since the site doesn't differentiate between In a Silent Way, Kind of Blue and, say, You're Under Arrest. Maybe we should do without Herbie Hancock, Weather Report or even Romantic Warrior, with all due respect.
I won't argue other picks I deem "controversial" though. Not fond of metal albums inclusion (Opeth, Queensryche, Dream Theater etc.), of these I find TOOL the most perplexing... but I'm not dying on that hill
(in what world Tool is ranked highly on progressive site while Symbolic, Black Future, Focus, Mental Vortex, Unquestionable Presence etc. don't come near?!)
My other gripe is ever-growing Prog Related collection. I know these are not featured in Top 100 - so I'm kinda offtopic here - but I say, any list with Hunky Dory and Master of Puppets trailing Black Sabbath is BS. Especially that poor Wishbone Ash, miles closer to Progressive Rock than any of the above, is thrown in the mix.
I think that's one area that Metalarchives figured out much better than Progarchives.
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43519
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 02:58 |
LAM-SGC wrote:
Cristi wrote:
LAM-SGC wrote:
Here's a novel idea, only include artists on PA that have called themselves prog or progressive at some point or where those words appeared on an album sleeve or in an official press release,book,documentary etc. |
it does not work like that.
If you dislike PA so much, why are you still here? Your negativity has got old. I don't see the point of your constant complaining. | Read the title of the thread "gripe",it was set-up for complaining, that is the whole point. Then read the first sentence of the text "With respect for everyone's opinion"
And then just scroll on by and talk a walk in the trees.
Why are you still here, reading this thread, if you think everything is fine?
Your negativity and constant complaining is boring. |
How am I being negative?
I have never understood why some people are annoyed by the top 100. But then again, there's rating abuse because god forbid someone's beloved album does not make it to the top or is low rated by others (tastes, you know) or whatever these people are thinking, what do i know...
There are many albums I love that are not in the top 100, what should I do, throw a hissy fit?
For a newbie to the world of prog, the top 100 gives a few ideas on what albums to start with.
|
|
LAM-SGC
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 26 2018
Location: se
Status: Offline
Points: 1544
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 02:39 |
In my world The Snow Goose Moonmadness Mirage ...or as I call it The Snow Madness Mirage, which I have experienced in Sweden, blinded by the winter light on snow covered roads and swerving for vehicles that aren't there.
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39936
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 02:26 |
Cristi wrote:
dougmcauliffe wrote:
I’ll add another. I love both these albums, but Moonmadness should be ranked higher than Mirage imo. |
funny thing: Mirage is 4.39 and Moonmadness is 4.38 |
Maybe it was a mirage that the Mirage album was ranked higher than Moonmadness, or maybe someone had a touch of Lunar Sea and ranked Mirage higher. Anyway, I'm going to set the record straight soon by giving Moonmadness five stars and Mirage four stars.
Edited by Psychedelic Paul - February 20 2020 at 02:42
|
|
LAM-SGC
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 26 2018
Location: se
Status: Offline
Points: 1544
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 02:10 |
Cristi wrote:
LAM-SGC wrote:
Here's a novel idea, only include artists on PA that have called themselves prog or progressive at some point or where those words appeared on an album sleeve or in an official press release,book,documentary etc. |
it does not work like that.
If you dislike PA so much, why are you still here? Your negativity has got old. I don't see the point of your constant complaining. | Read the title of the thread "gripe",it was set-up for complaining, that is the whole point. Then read the first sentence of the text "With respect for everyone's opinion" And then just scroll on by and talk a walk in the trees. Why are you still here, reading this thread, if you think everything is fine? Your negativity and constant complaining is boring.
|
|
Frenetic Zetetic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 20 2020 at 01:51 |
I think if it's jazz, it's jazz. Metal is metal. They can have progressive tendencies, but I always view prog rock as a conscious effort. Even the "art rock" bands knew they were attempting something more. I don't buy the BS "We all just thought it was ALL rock and roll" (insert prog band leader here), so why does it sound different? Because you were progressing the sound.
|
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
|
|