Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Interviews
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Martin Orford August 2009
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMartin Orford August 2009

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 23:43
Well...that was a depressing, bitter, and sad interview. But it was also sobering and insightful.

Overall, taking everything into account if I could trade no internet downloading--legal, illegal, good, bad--for the old CD/vinyl culture. I think I might just do it. There are positives and negatives we all know.

I would love to be candid about downloading, and I think I could at least give worthy opinions on it, but I think the past has proved to me ProgArchives is not the place for that.


Edited by stonebeard - September 30 2009 at 23:55
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 23:25
Originally posted by Windhawk Windhawk wrote:

The amazon numbers are total sales in a sales list


Are you sure? Because doing a Google search for "amazon sales charts" gets masses of hits for various records, games etc. "Topping the Amazon sales charts", and I can't believe the volume would steadily be increasing.

I also found this little tidbit: Amazon's bestselling album of 2008 was available as a free download.

When I checked, Frequency was listed as  #7,403 in Music (significantly higher than the number you gave).

Current #1 in Amazon sales rank for music is an as-yet unreleased album from a guy called Adam Lambert and I really doubt this guy has sold more in pre-sales than, say, Dark Side of the Moon or Thriller total.


Edited by Teaflax - September 30 2009 at 23:34
Back to Top
Windhawk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 23:12
The amazon numbers are total sales in a sales list - i.e. on the list of highest selling albums these albums have place such and such.
These are the list placements for the standard editions of those albums - various special editions doesn't count.
For better or worse, these are indicators as to how much more or less the given albums have sold compared to each other. Sadly they don't say anything about the number of copies shifted as such.
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 23:01
Are those Amazon numbers really a running total and not a snapshot of a current period, like a week or a month?

And I read Shawn's numbers as being a slump of 80%, not 20%. His answer was "as to percentages, it's something like 5x less than a couple albums ago", which doesn't make any sort of mathematical sense ("five times less" means nothing unless you have a number - if IQ sold 5,000 copies of 7thH and 4,999 of DM, five times less would mean 4,995 copies sold of Frequency). So I just assumed he actually meant " a fifth as much", as in an 80% drop since The 7th House, which would indeed be terribly disturbing news.

I think it's safe to say that this dire interpretation is nowhere near being right. I'm looking forward to hearing from the IQ Forum admin again, because I can't imagine he just pulled that statement out of his proverbial behind.
Back to Top
Windhawk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 22:29
As for IQ sales, until any better numbers may arise. Did a check on amazon's uk department, which should be a useful indicator for sales since they've ben around "forever", and is a sales outlet that shifts a fair few number of copies.

Sales rank Frequency: 21.759
Sales rank Dark Matter: 41.559

For the US department of Amazon:
Frequency: 152.528
Dark Matter: 66.092

For the German department of Amazon:
Frequency: 11.020
Dark Matter: 8,452

Apparently, Dark Matter shifted many more copies in the US and a few more in Germany than IQ's latest did, while in the UK the situation is the totally opposite.

Which makes Shawn's observations pretty accurate for the US market, yet also makes it plausible that IQ have actually sold more copies in total for their latest than for their previous effort.

Thoughts?
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 22:26
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


what was that guy's name - Dan Quiche eat ...


Real men don't tilt against windmills. ;)
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 21:15
O.K., for those who believe that sanctions will work, please take some time to read the RIAA's successes and the increase in CD sales in the past decade.
Then, imagine how many more CDs IQ would have sold if only blah blah blah. Are you certain that the other entertainment options available to people today does not have an effect ? Are you sure that those legal consumer choices don't actually play a much bigger part in decreasing CD sales ?

 So let's spend another 10 years staking out the moral high ground which is not even the site of any relevant battle nowadays. If all you can do is state the obvious (it's illegal) then join the ranks of the many who have made no progress in truly helping the musicians get paid for their music.

Or if you want an analogy - compare how effective the war on drugs is on drug use. Has the increase in funds been matched by a comparable decrease in drug use ? At what point does it make sense to think about how to make things work in today's world.

again, don't bother banging your head against the wall when there might be a window or door that you can use. And there are. Just not the ones that the industry was used to for the last 30-40 years. Reading up on the average  musician's challenges in the times preceding this so-called golden age might be an eye opener.

digital downloads are one option. they will not be the saviour of the industry. subscription services will be part of it too. but again, they won't be the answer to the entire problem. it will, unfortunately for the artistically entitled artiste, require work, and attention paid to the fan(s) who will pay for the LPs, CDs, Special edition box sets, merchandise, tour tickets, and such. Oh wait, the verb will "is" passed on ... the verb is "does" .
Radio , TV, advertising, record labels and such are no longer arbiters of what people will get to buy or hear. The listener is. And he has many more  choices today. Not counting the other amusing divertissements  that he can spend his hard earned money on. You do know that there are other things now that have taken up the consumer's budget , right ??? unless you can show me that consumers also got a matching pay raise to afford buying as much music as they used to AND pick up that Wii, that HDTV wide screen plus the home theater, and then that paper thin laptop that Little Joe wanted for Xmas, and that Iphone that your wife insisted she needs for her business, as if your blackberry wasn't good enough for her.

But that's harder to figure out than just pointing the finger at easy targets.

what was that guy's name - Dan Quiche eat ...


Edited by debrewguy - September 30 2009 at 21:21
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 19:04
Yeah, you're the one who proposes draconian police-state measures to deal with misdemeanors and uses inflammatory language to characterize said misdemeanor and I'm the one who is a provocateur. Right.

And again, no replies to perfectly valid questions on why other sources would lie and summary dismissal without showing any facts whatsoever.

How's that hole you're digging looking to you? Hit oil yet?

Edit: are you saying you're basing your previous statement on retail sales? In this day and age? Wow, that's either being staggeringly disingenuous or engaging in willful misrepresentation.


Edited by Teaflax - September 30 2009 at 19:09
Back to Top
BigBoss View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 18:49
Teaflax, I already know you like to instigate sh*t, and I know how this business works, and I can pull sales records at retail, so I know what the numbers are, so that's pretty much that.  Feel free to open yourself a soundscan account and pull them for yourself.
Best Regards,
Shawn Gordon
President
ProgRock Records
www.progrockrecords.com
www.mindawn.com
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 18:39
How would IQ's own site admin be so misinformed or why would he lie?

I'm going to assume that he has a direct pipeline to the band and therefore knows what he's talking about.

And, Shawn, since you have a proven history of is simply dismissing stated facts from reputable sources rather than engaging with or debunking them, you'll forgive me if I'm going to assume that you're either somehow misinformed or plain lying.

If it turns out to be the latter, I'm going to hold you to task for it, you can be sure of that. I took your statements in good faith and they really gave me pause. I don't take that kind of thing lightly.
Back to Top
BigBoss View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 18:14
I hate to say this, but typical hype, it hasn't.
Best Regards,
Shawn Gordon
President
ProgRock Records
www.progrockrecords.com
www.mindawn.com
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 18:11
Originally posted by iskye81 iskye81 wrote:


"FYI Frequency, in just 6 months, is IQ's biggest selling CD to date!!!


Shawn?
Back to Top
iskye81 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 18:06
Windhawk - I should say I'm only a bit of a lurker on the IQ forum, to my shame haven't posted there for ages. I've followed them for ages but never seen any concrete info on sales, on the forum or elsewhere.  The statement seems pretty unequivocal though...

Link to the topic on the IQ forum: http://www.iq-forum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2233&start=30
Back to Top
Windhawk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 17:48
Two very and vastly different figures on the sales of IQ's latest here...

iskye81 - any chance for you to check with the forums when it comes to -physical- copies sold compared to their previous efforts? If not actual numbers then at least some indication from a verified source there as to how much less/more it has sold in terms of CDs?
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 17:35
Not really.  It may be their best selling because its a good album, the band is on a popular upswing, and word of mouth is spreading.  Add in the figures of the stolen downloads to the sold CDs and the sales figures could be even better than they are.

Oh, and welcome to the forums!Smile
Back to Top
iskye81 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 17:28
Hello all,
Well it's probably not a wise idea to wade into a topic like this in your first post, but I couldn't resist posting this before anyone else...

"FYI Frequency, in just 6 months, is IQ's biggest selling CD to date!!!

On hindsight probably a good thing that it wasn't released on GEP (not the bands initial choice) and instead licenced to InsideOut who did a stellar job in promoting it."


..that's from Deno, who's the IQ forum admin, and I believe is heavily involved with the band.

Certainly seems to contradict what's been written previously in this topic.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 16:10
TGM: Every country has a different law, the requirement of permanently depraving is not common to all.

But I'm sure Australia has a determined law, for example in Perú we have:

1.- Hurto (Theft): Over US$ 1,000 more or less
2.- Hurto Menor (Minor theft): Bellow US$ 1,000.00
3.- Apropiación Ilicita (Illegal Apropriation): If you don't pretend to keep the stolen item forever.

N° 1 and N° 3 carry imprisonment, N° 2 not until this month, because there's an epidemy of pety thefts that are harming people, but due to the amount, tthey don't go to jail, according to the new law, they will  go to a maximum of 12 years if re-incident or if they harm the assaulted.

But the three are THEFT, in different degrees, stealing the property of others (intellectual or physical) are theft in different degrees, and should carry different sanctions.

Iván


            
Back to Top
TGM: Orb View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 14:30
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

When someone nicks your car, you can no longer use it, surely? This is quite a significant difference, at least, since downloading/uploading makes no direct difference to a label's ability to use their intellectual property... the one is crime against property, which deprives you of its use. The other, a crime against intellectual property, which leaves you basically unchanged except undemonstrably in your potential ability to sell albums. It's still wrong, but it's not theft in the sense in which theft is generally understood (or at least the sense suggested by those dreadful 'you wouldn't steal a handbag... movie piracy is stealing!' things at the start of DVDs).

Think im this,  the guy with your Mercedes Benz 2009 (largely over US$ 10,000.00 which is normally the limit for Grand Theft)  is captured, the car returned with no damage, probably even with more gas and polished  you suffer no difference in the ability to use it....Still the kid is captured and suffers a trial for Grand Theft being sent to prison for no less than 10 years.

Hey, you have suffered nothing...Your car is exactly or even better than when you lost it...The Judicial system doesn't judge a person for the effect of the robbery, but for the act of stealing

You are a musician, you work a year releasing an album, you struggle to feed your kids (unless you are part of a huge band or a well known artist), you release 20,000 copies, you sell 500 and an illegaluploader provides 10,000 copies to your target audience...Isn't this causing a damage to you?

You will say that the music is there to be sold...That's not accurate, there are 10,000 users who will probably never buy the album because  they have it already in a 325 kbps copy, with the covers perfectly scanned and on a Sony CD (US$ 1.00)............Why buy the milk if you have the cow for free? 

There's a damage and very strong, and think in something if you upload a terabyte, you are uploading 10,000 CD's, which is above the usual limit of Grand theft.

And even if the damage is only potential...The act of taking anything you don't own and giving it to third persons is theft, like it or not.

Iván


Ultimately, the condition of the car isn't what is relevant... it's that you yourself were deprived of demonstrable property and its use for this period of time. With downloading/uploading, you are only deprived of a non-demonstrable amount of unprovable income from sales. (i.e. would anyone who downloads an album have bought it? probably not... would everyone who downloads an album not buy it (according to my experience, a number would). We can't really say that X downloads equates to Y lost sales in general, anyway, given that available studies suggest that downloading's impact in terms of sales is greatest on the biggest acts, and thus not consistent across the board.

I mean, essentially, the extent of the 'theft', if we treat it as theft, is completely indeterminable.

On the other hand:

Originally posted by wikipedia wikipedia wrote:

In English law, theft was codified into a statutory offence in the Theft Act 1968 which defines it as:
"A person is guilty of theft, if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it". (Section 1)
Australian law seems to have a similar requirement with regard to the mens rea... no idea how it works elsewhere, and I'm trusting wikipedia here.

Now, I'm not saying it's harmless, nor that it's OK, but theft seems an incorrect, or at least deceptive tag for it, and branding this as 'stealing', I imagine, simply encourages people to view 'the industry' as dishonest.

(and that's frankly the single most common excuse/reason I hear for downloading... I think depriving people of that sort of excuse is worthwhile)


Edited by TGM: Orb - September 30 2009 at 14:34
Back to Top
Windhawk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 13:31
One good reason to hook up with Mindawn is that they have much/most of Musea's extensive catalogue available in digital format there.

Which, as far as I know, isn't available in digital format anywhere else.
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
Back to Top
progmetalhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 2081
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 13:07
^^ Thanks Thumbs Up
http://www.last.fm/user/colt2112

Colt - Admin Team MMA

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.189 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.