Megan Fox or Jessica Biel

thellama73 wrote: What is it with you guys and Hispanic women?

My criteria has less to do with ethnicity and more to do with teh bewbs.  

 

Epignosis wrote:   My thing is "Why do guys find those women that attractive?"  I don't understand it- probably never will.  No biggie.  It's all a matter of opinion, and that's a good thing, because someone found me attractive.

I find you attractive as well. Nah, bad choice of word, more like sympathetic (basic word: sympathy). Said guy happy in relationship with a girl for two years and four more years before this one with various girls.

Girls.

To be honest, I won't touch Megan Fox even if she danced in a flirting way in front of me. She's simply too artificial for me, I like different kind of girls. 

Yes, you can make ironic post now and show some totally gross photos of "natural" girls and I would perhaps laugh, but I hope you understand my point.

Edited by Marty McFly - October 28 2010 at 09:37

Epignosis wrote: JLocke wrote: CoCambria wrote: Epignosis wrote: JLocke wrote: Epignosis wrote: Snow Dog wrote: Neither really. This. Oh, right. Forgot. Neither of them are pudgy enough for you.  Biel isn't so bad, but I don't find her attractive really. Megan Fox looks absolutely frightful to me.    Ok, to say that Megan is frightful is just extreme.  Its not like she looks like Susan Boyle.  Unless you prefer her. She is pudgy too! Rob has very particular taste in women. He seems to only go for the types of girls he knows he'll actually have a chance with. While that's a very realistic way to be, I hardly ever agree with him. In this case, however, I actually do see his point. Fox's lips and eyes make her look like a fish.  Wha??    I've dated all sorts of girls, from wholesome to trashy, tall, skinny and blonde to short, dumpy and brunette.  The only type of girl I go for now is the one I'm married to, and I'll have you know I don't have any chance with her!  But yes, as for Fox: Gah!  She gives me the shivers.

Very well, you can have her.  I'll take Keeley Hazell.  

martinprog77 wrote: i prefert salma

Megan Fox was pretty but then she decided to make her lips horrendously bigger. Jessica Biel has a pretty face and some other quite spectacular assets... . She wins.

My standards of beauty are as unrealistic as the next guy, but I have to agree with Rob that neither of these women do much for me. If it's Hollywood girls we're after, I like Elizabeth Hurley in the first Austin Powers movie, Courtney Cox in the early 90's and Megyn Kelly on Fox News (the last of which is my ideal woman in every way.)

Snow Dog wrote: Neither really.

Meant no offense, Rob. I simply stated my opinion that the type of girls you always seem to scoff at are girls that nearly every other guy in america would give a limb for, while the girls you always say are the 'true' beauties are more natural, everyday pretty girls. The former NONE of us would have a chance with, since they aren't real. But I'm one of those fellas who still goes for the hollywood definition of attractive at times, though not always. It's more like my tastes are fairly broad, so sometimes my type of girl overlaps with hollywood's type of girl. It's mere coincidence, really. 

CoCambria wrote: Epignosis wrote: JLocke wrote: Epignosis wrote: Snow Dog wrote: Neither really. This. Oh, right. Forgot. Neither of them are pudgy enough for you.  Biel isn't so bad, but I don't find her attractive really. Megan Fox looks absolutely frightful to me.    Ok, to say that Megan is frightful is just extreme.  Its not like she looks like Susan Boyle.  Unless you prefer her. She is pudgy too!