Announcing the Prog-Metal split

PLEASE don't start any discussion again...PLEASE...

sircosick wrote: Why isn't it closed yet? The split was actually announced and already made, and kickin'  xD

it's called... using the search function... beat the hell out of a  thread titled...


'what the hell happened to Prog Metal while I was away'

and the trolls, hyenas, and assorted RIO freaks would have descended upon the thread... then Jody would have put his size 12's up our keisters in an attempt to reign us in...

probably best it wasn't closed aye!

Wow, I've been gone for a while, and look what happens!

Actually the new categories make more sense to me... I had always thought that Prog Metal was too all-encompassing of a genre to include such a variety of styles.

Well done!


Edited by Empathy - December 14 2007 at 16:42

Well done everyone! Especially love the experimental/post-metal section.

Opeth was moved... awesome!

OK, congratulations to the Prog Metal Team, I think the split was more accepted than Art Rock one

Some trolls seem to survived the demise of Sauron, probably olog-hai trolls, they can even log on to the internet,  but not really able or wantingto write something worthwhile.

TheProgtologist wrote: sircosick wrote: The main issue here is the diversity of what we consider prog and what we do not. All of us, from me and PHP to any admin, are in their own to put personal boundaries to prog.... Anyway, is that useful??? ................... However, it creates a DIVERSITY, which everyone has to RESPECT and TOLERATE. There isn't an absolute truth or a god called PROG who says what is prog, what is not...... to each his own!....   I can't see where our mate PHP is trolling.... he's stating his points of view, having a wide knowledge of prog, which are exactly the opposite as Mike, as Progtolo, etc. etc. etc..... discussin' is good, even if we barely arrive to a common conclusion.       Have you even read through this thread?Or any other threads PHP participates in?   "However, it creates a DIVERSITY, which everyone has to RESPECT and TOLERATE. There isn't an absolute truth or a god called PROG who says what is prog, what is not...... to each his own!.... "   PHP runs all over the forum posting in every thread dealing with prog metal,stating his opinion that none of this is prog,not prog metal,not post-rock,etc.He says we don't know what true prog is,and he does.   Is that tolerant?Is that diverse?Is that respectful of other people's tastes?He is trying to tell us what is prog and what is not,according to HIM.   We aren't trying to shove prog metal down your throats,if you don't like it,fine.There are a lot of other genres here for everyone to enjoy.But he is trying to shove HIS opinion down our throats,and I for one am sick of it.   Do you see me or Mike or Teo go into a Zeuhl thread and go...."Well,Zeuhl isn't prog,you guys don't know what true prog is,but we do",and then end it all with annoying,smart-ass emoticons?(I'm not picking on Zeuhl mind you,I just picked agenre randomly).   And we don't hide who we are,and post using multiple identities.   Ya know what I mean?

Sorry, but you're just WRONG, I have only ONE account...please..

MikeEnRegalia wrote: ^ Symphonic does not necessarily mean orchestral or particularly related to classical music ... it can also mean lush keyboards and a certain type of melodic interplay between instruments. It's really difficult to define!