Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 08:24 |
Raff wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I like them, but I left them out on purpose as I don't really agree that the belong here on PA. Or its not that I mind them being here so much. More correctly I only included bands/artists I consider to have released atleast one genuinely progressive album (which is why I left out Doors and Hendrix as well) Rather subjective I guess, but according to a kind of prog consensus Beatles doesn't have a progalbum. When discussing the most influential progressive band or artist I think of Beatles as belonging among those who paved the way rather than being a genuine part of Prog. |
I see your point, and agree that The Beatles did not release any album that can be considered fully progressive (at least in the way most people on this forum consider progressive to be). However, bear in mind that a lot of people (here and elsewhere) consider the likes of Radiohead not to be prog either. Having been an active PA member for over five years (my husband Micky and I founded the Art Rock Team), I could tell you a lot of entertaining (and some not so entertaining) stories about controversial additions.
| Sure. There's no absolutes. I don't think I'm 100% correct and anyone with another opinion than mine is 100% wrong. To an extent I guess different opinions can both be correct at once. I wouldn't label Radiohead as "Prog" myself really, but its experimental rock and rather complex/forward thinking, progressive music (much more than people whose only heard a handful of their ageing radio hits are aware of) that has its natural place here in one or more of Prog's subgenres. You'll live and learn: Myself I found it ridiculous to discover Metallica here until relistening to my old copy of ...And Justice For All (and later even Master of Puppets) double vinyl with a different mindset.
Edited by Saperlipopette! - October 26 2014 at 08:25
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 08:16 |
Raff wrote:
I think there is an obvious omission in the above list - The Beatles. Like them or not, they were hugely influential in the development of progressive rock as we know it, and their influence remains to this day.
|
And in terms of the question framed, which was influence on music in general, they are numero uno.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 08:09 |
Rick Robson wrote:
Hey Micky it's very interesting what you are telling me, I believe too that some of the important facts of our lifes are truly tied to our fate, seeming to happen especially in crucial moments. By the way I'm married with an argentinian beauty of great character, well not from such an opposite end of the earth hahah, that's the power of love isn't it? |
I'll drink to that Rick!!! Fate is a funny thing. I often joke with friends, you couldn't make a sappy supermarket aisle romance novel that rivals what happened to the two of us. Our chances to succeed were likely 1 in a 100, any number of things could have derailed everything and though this f**king government of ours made it hard for her to get here, almost as hard to stay here, we have persevered. We celebrated 8 years together last week.
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 07:51 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I like them, but I left them out on purpose as I don't really agree that the belong here on PA. Or its not that I mind them being here so much. More correctly I only included bands/artists I consider to have released atleast one genuinely progressive album (which is why I left out Doors and Hendrix as well) Rather subjective I guess, but according to a kind of prog consensus Beatles doesn't have a progalbum. When discussing the most influential progressive band or artist I think of Beatles as belonging among those who paved the way rather than being a genuine part of Prog. |
I see your point, and agree that The Beatles did not release any album that can be considered fully progressive (at least in the way most people on this forum consider progressive to be). However, bear in mind that a lot of people (here and elsewhere) consider the likes of Radiohead not to be prog either. Having been an active PA member for over five years (my husband Micky and I founded the Art Rock Team), I could tell you a lot of entertaining (and some not so entertaining) stories about controversial additions.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 07:21 |
Raff wrote:
I think there is an obvious omission in the above list - The Beatles. Like them or not, they were hugely influential in the development of progressive rock as we know it, and their influence remains to this day.
|
I like them, but I left them out on purpose as I don't really agree that the belong here on PA. Or its not that I mind them being here so much. More correctly I only included bands/artists I consider to have released atleast one genuinely progressive album (which is why I left out Doors and Hendrix as well) Rather subjective I guess, but according to a kind of prog consensus Beatles doesn't have a progalbum. When discussing the most influential progressive band or artist I think of Beatles as belonging among those who paved the way rather than being a genuine part of Prog.
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 07:05 |
Ok, question of commas. I have interpreted "the most" as "the maximum number of". Your question was about "the main influencer".
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 07:03 |
I think there is an obvious omission in the above list - The Beatles. Like them or not, they were hugely influential in the development of progressive rock as we know it, and their influence remains to this day.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 07:01 |
? Numbers? Now I'm not sure what you mean. I made a poll with the question: Who's the most influentual artist here on PA?
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 06:56 |
This was your question, isn't it?
"who do you think has influenced the most artists and bands"
This is about numbers, not quality.
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 06:55 |
Miles Davis.
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 06:49 |
Well it was in direct response to something and obviously not obvious to everyone.
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 06:47 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
You, me, Wetton... we all have our blind spots and preferences. When I bought the second, third and fourth Nice album (found them all really cheap) I was (like many curious progfans) very dissapointed. I also felt like I was listening to a musical dead end. I wasn't around when all this happened so I can't really claim to know how it played out. But there's little doubt that KC's 1969-debut, containing two or perhaps even three or four songs that is echoed in literally countless compositions by progbands all over the world made a much bigger splash than anything from the albums by The Nice. On top of that Fripp reinvented KC into something darker, jazzier, dissonant and more experimental that young belgian/french folks coming out of conservatories transformed into Chamber Rock, Avant Prog (or R.I.O if you will. I know you know all about this).
I agree that Zappa kick started something that "everyone" was listening to and inspired by. But In the Court... is nevertheless a unique starting point and a guiding star to what came after labeled Progressive Rock.
-sorry for a couple of not so elegant sentences and such. english is not my first language. |
As obvious as this...
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 06:28 |
octopus-4 wrote:
It's an old story. One can say that Beethoven started it all and Orff invented the Zeuhl. The first percussionist was likely a Neanderthal who may have invented the growling, too. It depends on when you put the starting point. |
Yes and yawn, Captain Obvious
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 05:51 |
It's an old story. One can say that Beethoven started it all and Orff invented the Zeuhl. The first percussionist was likely a Neanderthal who may have invented the growling, too. It depends on when you put the starting point. Good spot on The Nice, anyway.
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 05:37 |
richardh wrote:
and yet no one has mentioned The Nice. There are plenty of KC and Pink Floyd fanboys to challenge the Genesis fanboys on this site. How many are musicians and how many actually know what they are talking about? John Wetton was interviewed recently and pretty much gave all the credit to Zappa for kick starting the prog scene. |
You, me, Wetton... we all have our blind spots and preferences. When I bought the second, third and fourth Nice album (found them all really cheap) I was (like many curious progfans) very dissapointed. I also felt like I was listening to a musical dead end. I wasn't around when all this happened so I can't really claim to know how it played out. But there's little doubt that KC's 1969-debut, containing two or perhaps even three or four songs that is echoed in literally countless compositions by progbands all over the world made a much bigger splash than anything from the albums by The Nice. On top of that Fripp reinvented KC into something darker, jazzier, dissonant and more experimental that young belgian/french folks coming out of conservatories transformed into Chamber Rock, Avant Prog (or R.I.O if you will. I know you know all about this). I agree that Zappa kick started something that "everyone" was listening to and inspired by. But In the Court... is nevertheless a unique starting point and a guiding star to what came after labeled Progressive Rock. -sorry for a couple of not so elegant sentences and such. english is not my first language.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 04:35 |
I personally would not dispute the influence of Nice or Zappa on prog rock. I have not claimed in any case that Floyd alone originated prog rock. I am not foolish enough to make such outrageous claims, sorry. I actually like KC more than Floyd and Genesis about the same, but thanks for assuming I am a Floyd fanboy (now don't pretend you didn't).
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Online
Points: 28057
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 04:31 |
and yet no one has mentioned The Nice. There are plenty of KC and Pink Floyd fanboys to challenge the Genesis fanboys on this site. How many are musicians and how many actually know what they are talking about? John Wetton was interviewed recently and pretty much gave all the credit to Zappa for kick starting the prog scene.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Online
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 03:48 |
Not that you need any help Rogerthat. But I gotta say that SteveG; if you read your whole dispute with this smart fellow here you should start blushing. The way you're discussing, taking weak arguments originating from your own posts twisting it into something that can be used to your advantage against your opponent isn't very impressive.
And btw: Pink Floyd not really influential? Are you kidding me? 1967: Interstellar Overdrive (+Astronomy Domine) - 10 minutes that along with 1968's Saucerful and a couple of more PF-tunes pretty much singlehandedly kickstarted Krautrock, Space Rock, German Kosmishe, Psychedelic Rock... All this before we've even gotten to Echoes and Dark Side of the Moon.
Btw: I'm as surprised as Guldbamsen that Genesis is actually in the lead. Trespass simply wouldn't exist in the shape it does (neither would Yes Album, Gentle Giant or ELP) without KC's number one in the UK-album - In The Court of the Crimson King.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 25 2014 at 21:30 |
SteveG wrote:
I knew this was coming as I said that I've been at this for a while. First off, like most people, you confuse influence with imitation. They are not the same thing. Silent Lucidity is a facsimile of a Pink Floyd song, and that is not influence. Michael Kaman's score should helped to give that away along with the myriad of Floyd recording tricks. The rest of the album, btw, owes no 'influence' to Floyd. The following song's are Queensryche's alone: Best that I Can, The Thin Line, Jet City Woman, Della Brown, Another Rainy Night, Empire, Resistance and Hand On Heart. Are your starting to realize the difference between influence and imitation?
|
Confusion? No, I don't think there is any confusion, neither from
your side nor mine. What I am quite sure of is you are pretty adept at
shifting the goalposts as per your convenience. If it's just influence you are
interested in, I have already established that a few pages now. I believe
it was you who introduced the wrinkle that there are no Floyd-clones like
Genesis-neo prog (I will come to this point a bit later). And it was in
this context I pointed out slabs of music that are very Floyd-like even in
songs of bands that would not count Floyd as a dominant influence. Er, I
am afraid you first need to decide whether your original question was really
one of sincere inquiry or are you just trying to manufacture arguments that
'help' you conclude that no influence is significant as long as the source is
Floyd?
Anyhow, we'll start with Silent Lucidity. First off, no, it's not
a facsimile. The song actually has metal riffs in the background during
the spoken voice bit so that's not like Floyd at all. And Tate's delivery
is pure metal again, especially once he gets out of the low pitched intro.
A facsimile would have to be an exact or near exact facsimile. You don’t have to take my word for it as far
as the meaning of the word goes. According
to the Merriam Webster dictionary as well, facsimile is “an exact copy”. You may shift goal posts if you wish (though
that makes the discussion process much more difficult) but you cannot change
the plain meaning of English words.
Secondly, it has nothing to do with Kamen’s arrangements or Floyd’s
recording tricks. I cited the VOCAL
MELODY of the opening verse, which is very similar in places to Mother. As far as I know, note-similarity in vocal
melodies cannot be attributed to arrangements or recording tricks. I am also aware that the band as such is not
strongly influenced by Floyd and, though Empire is a pretty boring album, I too
do not recall any Floyd like moments in say Jet City Woman. Here’s the thing. Nearly everybody has heard a Floyd album at
one point or the other. With the result
that there is a deeply embedded Floyd influence that creeps in at some point or
the other in the work of many, many bands.
My friend is a prog rock musician and not a particularly big fan of
Floyd though he does respect them and he has, by self admission, been
influenced by Floyd in writing some guitar parts.
Prog rockers, I find, think influence is just structure or
arrangements. That is a very prog, and
narrow, point of view. There’s also the
meat: the vocal melodies, the riffs, the chords, that is, the parts. While Floyd may not have stuck to definite
patterns in the way they develop music owing to their flexibility, there are
definite patterns in their melodies, riffs and chords that Floyd fans can certainly
recognise immediately as the signature of their band. Some such Floyd fans, serious or casual, go
on to become musicians and traces of Floyd can be found in their music. To argue that such influence is insignificant
would be disingenuous in the extreme because that would tantamount to saying
that significant influence of Beatles is measured only by those bands that
cloned them and not by those who were inspired by them to make music. And by the way, to reiterate, Silent Lucidity
is not a one off. I can go on with many,
many such examples of various bands from a variety of genres. You may pretend that is not influence if it
suits you, but I shall recognise it quickly for what it is: a pretence and no
more.
Moving on to the question of what genres Floyd spawned, I think it would
take a strong case of musical blindness to deny their role in the development
of pyschedelic and space rock and, through their Barrett albums, on Krautrock
as well. Sure, they share that honour
with Doors, Jefferson Airplane and to a lesser extent Beatles (Revolver),
Hawkwind following a bit later. It is
not exclusive, but they are one of the most significant influences on a vast
majority of bands in these genres. And
this is where I return to neo prog and Genesis.
I am quite familiar with Marillion, IQ and Twelfth Night, three of the most important neo prog bands. None of these bands would count only Genesis
as their source material. Twelfth Night
actually have a bit of NWOBHM (which can also be heard in Marillion’s Garden
Party track) going on. Marillion and IQ
are both also influenced by Rush. Pink
Floyd also rears its ugly head again when it comes to Marillion and not just in
the form of Gilmour leads. The riffs of
Brick in the Wall are evoked when guitar takes over in Assassing. So the claim that each and every neo prog
band is just a Genesis clone is mostly a figment of the fertile imagination of
Genesis fanatics and little more. One Grendel does not a Genesis clone make.
Again, that was just one example with respect to Marillion. So don’t
rush to pretend you’ve got to just refute that to negate the argument. I cannot and will not spend time enumerating
each and every such instance, so do not insult my intelligence. As it is you who wish to claim that Floyd ‘s
influence is not so significant, going against conventional wisdom which holds
that Floyd is one of the most influential rock bands of all times, it is really
up to you to explain why. And if you don’t
have any interest in doing so, that is your choice. But in that case do remember that when you point
fingers at people saying they only hear what they want to hear, three of your
own point right back at you. Such claims
are neither very convincing nor very pleasant. As far as I am concerned, Floyd's influence on music as a whole is far deeper than that of any prog rock band save Kraftwerk. Um, Miles Davis isn't really a prog ROCK artist but yeah, him too. And I would go so far as to state that only prog rock fans could possibly believe that is not the case.
Edited by rogerthat - October 25 2014 at 21:33
|
|
Rick Robson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 03 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Status: Offline
Points: 1607
|
Posted: October 25 2014 at 20:26 |
micky wrote:
haha. Yeah. I do love my love pain and pleasure. My ex-wife was a fiery red head .. so what did I do to myself when that gradual 10 year destruction of my self-esteem and will to live finally ended... immediately fall madly in love with a fiery Italian woman.
Never a dull moment. Nothing bores me more than docile people with no fire or passion.
Fortunately Raff understands and accepts me for what I am, and my many substantial faults like me ex never could. Not a day passes, that I am not thankful for fate or whatever God, call him Ivan Melgar-Morey or call him whatever, that brought us together from very different backgrounds, cultures, and places from opposite ends of the earth.
|
Hey Micky it's very interesting what you are telling me, I believe too that some of the important facts of our lifes are truly tied to our fate, seeming to happen especially in crucial moments. By the way I'm married with an argentinian beauty of great character, well not from such an opposite end of the earth hahah, that's the power of love isn't it?
|
"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy." LvB
|
|