Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - what is prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedwhat is prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 12:38
^LOL
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 12:36
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ except when it's prog-related, proto-prog or various artists ... WackoWink
 
.. or titled "Ababcab" or "Invisible touch" or...
Back to Top
Uroboros View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 25 2006
Location: Oxford
Status: Offline
Points: 912
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 12:34
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

  Furthermore, if an fictional band releases an album, let's say, 60 minutes longs with 8 tracks on it...

Track 01: average country with spices of rock in Garth Brooks style
Track 02: a blues piece utilising slide
Track 03: a heavy metal number in Megadeth style
Track 04: a short folkish protest tune, with mouth organ (harmonica)
Track 05: a collaboration with a tenor in "Pavarotti meets Bono Vox for world peace" style
Track 06: alternative piece between Stereolab and Sonic Youth
Track 07: pure contemporary classical, short piano piece, because keyboardist is classically trained and insisted on inclusion of his work on this album. Just unaccompanied Steinway piano.
Track 08: (longest track, 10 mins) electronic piece, typical acid-house, no live instruments, because guitarist is toying with computers in his free time, and wanted to include his piece on this album.


...this album is diverse and eclectic. Is it prog?


 
 
The band's name is Estradasphere and yes, they are included on this site under RIO/avant prog. Check them out - they are totally worth your time. Wink
Tous les chemins
qui s’ouvrent à moi
ne mènent à rien si tu n’es plus là
Back to Top
Mandrakeroot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Italian Prog Specialist

Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 11:18
THE PROG IS ART!!!

This is another art:

http://www.toscanaviva.com/Firenze/david_michelangelo.jpg

http://www.uwm.edu/People/bendiner/colorILL/86%20Manet.jpg
http://www.studiopesci.it/download/photoes/kostabibramante06.jpg

http://www.miaferrovia.it/foto/etr/etr200.jpg


Edited by Mandrakeroot - March 21 2007 at 11:20
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 11:08
^ except when it's prog-related, proto-prog or various artists ... WackoWink
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Penumbra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 08 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 350
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 10:44
I believe I can answer the question of "What is prog?" once and for all:

What ever is on Prog Archives is Prog.

....
          The Holy Trinity of Symphonic Progressive Rock
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 10:20
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I think that it takes more than just being experimental ... you also need outstanding musicianship or high artistic standards. For example, I don't think that the "Einstürzende Neubauten" are prog ... they're extremely experimental, but not very good musicians.


I dont think good musicianship is a prerequisite. I think progressiveness in music is in the ideas. It just so happens that most known prog bands can play to a very high standard too. Luckily many execelltn musos were drawn to prog. Hawkwind are a good example of a progressive band who musicianship has at best always been average and at worst been appalling; certainly when compared alongside other prog bands.

Also, a lot of Brian Eno's music was very 'progressive' but there was little evidence of virtuosity in his playing (I dont know if he is virtuoso standard or not)


I don't care much for Hawkwind ... but I have no problems accepting them as a prog band. I think that "Prog" has many different forms and criteria, and a lack in one criteria can be compensated by others ... up to a certain point. And of course there's a historic component as well - if a band was always considered to be prog for several decades, then they are, no matter what we think about the music today.

About Brian Eno: Like I said before - minimalistic music is rarely about virtuosity ... in this genre there are other criteria than for example in "standard prog metal" like Dream Theater or Symphony X, where virtuosic playing is one of the cornerstones.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 10:19
Originally posted by NotSoKoolAid NotSoKoolAid wrote:

As this topic proves, progressive rock is anything anyone wants it to be. Nobody agrees, and everybody has a different definition, so they fight.
 
I am really beginning to see the chicken and egg thing here, but I don't see fighting. Just difference of opinion. It may very well be something that can not be answered because of the liberal use of the terminology over many years.


Edited by StyLaZyn - March 21 2007 at 10:20
Back to Top
cmidkiff View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 10:14
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I think that it takes more than just being experimental ... you also need outstanding musicianship or high artistic standards. For example, I don't think that the "Einstürzende Neubauten" are prog ... they're extremely experimental, but not very good musicians.


I dont think good musicianship is a prerequisite. I think progressiveness in music is in the ideas. It just so happens that most known prog bands can play to a very high standard too. Luckily many execelltn musos were drawn to prog. Hawkwind are a good example of a progressive band who musicianship has at best always been average and at worst been appalling; certainly when compared alongside other prog bands.

Also, a lot of Brian Eno's music was very 'progressive' but there was little evidence of virtuosity in his playing (I dont know if he is virtuoso standard or not)
 
and not just good musicianship but the complexity of the composition itself as well. 
cmidkiff
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 08:57
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I think that it takes more than just being experimental ... you also need outstanding musicianship or high artistic standards. For example, I don't think that the "Einstürzende Neubauten" are prog ... they're extremely experimental, but not very good musicians.


I dont think good musicianship is a prerequisite. I think progressiveness in music is in the ideas. It just so happens that most known prog bands can play to a very high standard too. Luckily many execelltn musos were drawn to prog. Hawkwind are a good example of a progressive band who musicianship has at best always been average and at worst been appalling; certainly when compared alongside other prog bands.

Also, a lot of Brian Eno's music was very 'progressive' but there was little evidence of virtuosity in his playing (I dont know if he is virtuoso standard or not)
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 08:36
^ not necessarily ... it is just more difficult to determine the "artistic level" of minimalistic music than with flashy, "in your face" technical music.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
toolis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2006
Location: MacedoniaGreece
Status: Offline
Points: 1678
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 07:55
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I think that it takes more than just being experimental ... you also need outstanding musicianship or high artistic standards. For example, I don't think that the "Einstürzende Neubauten" are prog ... they're extremely experimental, but not very good musicians.


wouldn't that exclude most of modern post rock?
-music is like pornography...

sometimes amateurs turn us on, even more...



-sometimes you are the pigeon and sometimes you are the statue...
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 07:37
^ I think that it takes more than just being experimental ... you also need outstanding musicianship or high artistic standards. For example, I don't think that the "Einstürzende Neubauten" are prog ... they're extremely experimental, but not very good musicians.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
russellk View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 782
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 06:52
I think it's a sensibility. When a musician takes a theme and makes something unexpected from it, something beyond normal expectations, that's the progressive sensibility.

Edited by russellk - March 21 2007 at 06:53
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 06:34
I joined here is 2004. This topic has been discussed many times, and it seems an agreement can never be reached.

I could waste time writing some old tosh about it being a form of popular music, that blends classical, folk, jazz and avantgarde influences with rock, and is OFTEN charecterised by extended play, virtuoso musicianship and conceptual lyrical themes that stray from the conventions of normal rock/pop music....

But manys would contest that, and make a point about the 'genre' being split into so many 'sub genres' that so many examples of what is percieved to be prog dont fall within the parameters of my definition..

So, leave me out of it, yeah..

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65644
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 06:21
Interesting discussion. I sometimes remember that rock`n roll itself was a musical progression of blues, boogie woogie, gospel, etc., thrown together with new instrumental and vocal fire. Rock was and is progressive, continuing to evolve in a tradition of both rule making and breaking.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 05:59
If you're going to talk about music, terminology helps. By saying that it's limiting to have genre names, you're essentially saying that music should not be discussed in terms beyond "I like/don't like this".
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 05:10
Originally posted by laplace laplace wrote:

this comes back to my progressive rock uncertainty principle - you can't describe it simultaneously as a genre and as a movement


hense all the difficulty...  not being able to describe it is why these threads will be around  as long as the site is.  It was a movement the someone down the line slapped a genre tag of prog on.  Genres usually have things in commen... tell me what Krautrock, Canterbury, Zeuhl, Space Rock, Electonic..etc, have in commen.  Nothing actually musically...  they were like the light emitting by the sun.... from the same commen point...   all in different directions. That is a movement, or was one,  today someone threw an umbrella genre tag on it and put groups that have little to do with each other under the same umbrella. My two cents... and that is never more applicable than this subect.  No one sees this the same way.


Edited by micky - March 21 2007 at 05:10
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2007 at 05:00
Originally posted by el böthy el böthy wrote:

I don´t want to ofend anyone, but whenever this newies want to start a thread which they think is very revolutionary... don´t, chances are it has been done till death...Confused
 
No harm in newer members discussing old topics. Wink
Back to Top
Penumbra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 08 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 350
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 20 2007 at 22:37
I believe that the moment the music which defies pop standards of the day is released, it becomes part of the standard. This having occured, any new music also becomes part of the mold. Eventually, humans will have used every chord position and arpeggio on a key - or fretboard. What is there to do after that but finish the cycle and make music that no one remembers anymore, music from years and years ago?

What is progression itself but a cycle? Think of a revolution in the political spectrum; the Left always becomes the Right once it is successful. What is "prog" now will not be the very millisecond it is released, or perhaps twenty seconds later when it first is bought and heard in a CD player. It isn't new anymore; it is just the latest album or composition, making it THE PAST. Sure, it may be progress over something made earlier, but the piece of music, in a singular form, has now been played and recorded.

What is all this prog hogwash, anyway? I think there are far too many genres that overlap. If that's been said a thousand times, my name is Penumbra
          The Holy Trinity of Symphonic Progressive Rock
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.201 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.