PA Album of the Year Discussion thread |
Post Reply | Page <1234 12> |
Author | ||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Well done! Hard work done by many here to make this happen, now it's up to you (the forum users) to submit your lists
EDIT: Speaking of the work - have a look at the log of the "paBot" at AP: Whenever this user account adds an album, it's actually me. The process is semi-automated, but still requires me to go through all the releases that have been added to PA and for each one try to match it to existing AP releases, adding artists if necessary, and then of course link everything to RYM, Spotify and Bandcamp. It's a tedious task, but on the other hand it gives me a special type of awareness of what's happening. And I hope that the result is useful to you, in the form of the release polls and the release calendar at AP. Edited by MikeEnRegalia - January 11 2024 at 01:15 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, a cleaner list topic is much better. It did take a long time, but was worth the effort. Glad you recommended a change. |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Oh yes, that should be no problem. Fine that he was not an active poster at the forum before. But if people join just to seemingly prop up albums, get suspended, or use alternate accounts, those people should not be counted.
|
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Online Points: 20847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The recent post by axel is worth consideration, he/she has been here since 2021 but the vote was their first ever post.
|
||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Sorry, I moved those to this thread. I was rushing to write that and spent ages moving posts to this new topic for discussion of issue and leaving the other topic for lists. That said, I think that message serves its purpose which arises from a concern that people may join up just to prop up an album. Maybe I should not have said active members, but it was meant as a general alert. By active members I also mean has not been suspended. Of course an account must be active to post a list, but if that person gets suspended then I don't think the list should count. And if that member has been suspended before and come here under another account, I don't think that person should be counted. I wanted to be a little ambiguous and leave us some space for action and it did not occur to me that could be seen as an issue by regulars. Anyway, I have not slept for two days so hard to think. Won't try to change the wording now, but that has no effect on most of us.
EDIT: I will edit out the word active from the opening post I wrote yesterday in the topic intended for lists. Edited by Logan - January 10 2024 at 17:18 |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ good point, currently no check is implemented, but I can add a rule based on the joined date.
|
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think possibly one important rule has been forgotten as per Logan's OP :
In the past this was only open to collaborators and some VIPs, but now it's open to all active PA members provided they aren't new members registering here in order to prop-up certain albums. Also, Mike of awesomeprog has provided an awesome tool to use where you can look through the yearly albums, search for albums and add and order those albums for your own list: see https://awesomeprog.com/aoty-poll EDIT - but are we going by new forum members or joining date? It does also say 'active PA members'.
Edited by richardh - January 10 2024 at 16:09 |
||
mathman0806
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 06 2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Now that's quick response! Nice! |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Rules are important, they make this process easier and more effective. As we have changed this from Collab of the Year to including all members, and this is the official pre-results topic, and Mike will be looking at the post copying over form his site, I do ask people to do one that has up to 20 albums that are listed at this link: https://awesomeprog.com/aoty-poll It's fun and easy to add, and great if many members factor into the official PA album of the year results.
Usually we do a discussion thread and a list one separately, but thought we could maybe combine them if it is not confusing for Mike. Will came up with this topic too which can be used informally. That was intended for non-collabs, but it had not yet been announced that we decided to be open to members be they collab or not (I always preferred that idea if workable, to be honest). Here is Will's topic whcih I hope people support as well. https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=132142 And perhaps that can include lists in other formats methinks and be less formal in that way. Note: this was an early post of mine in the older AOTY thread that I linked to on page one here, which is now intended for lists specifically, but after exporting I overwrote my message for the topic and used this new post space to save it. Edited by Logan - January 09 2024 at 16:04 |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Good point, will see it done.
EDIT: done! Edited by MikeEnRegalia - January 09 2024 at 05:15 |
||
mathman0806
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 06 2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
First, I would like to say I appreciate the tool Mike has developed and having this poll open for non-collaborators introduced me to some albums I may not have listened to.
Second, a suggestion for Mike. I was looking at the ratings output and I think the numbering needs to account for ties so the next number skips. For example, if two albums are ranked #4, the next album should be #6, not #5. That way if you get to the number 50 album there are 49 albums ranked above it. |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I saw that, seemed petulant to me. Well, we would want to ask first, but I think this case is different, since yours is the official tool of 2023's Album of the Year. Official tool has a nice ring to it.
I wonder if you would be okay if we added this list ordered in the same way? Note that the lists can contain music in and out of PA. |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I could add manual lists to the chart, but it has been pointed out to me (in another forum) that doing something like that infringes on the rights of the person (to control where/how their data is being used).
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Okay, gotcha. Thanks.
On another note: Ideally, I would like to see all manual lists here count towards the vote. I noticed at progressiveears that you were adding people's list to your tool's charts and I think you might have done the same here. Of course this should not discourage people from trying their best to use your tool at your site. Edited by Logan - January 09 2024 at 04:14 |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The point of the new feature is that users can submit an unranked list via the tool. Previously the tool would always imbue significance to the order of the releases, not only displaying them as a ranked list but also distributing the points based on it, thereby rewarding the top entries and punishing the bottom entries. The unranked list is simply a way to say "these are my favorites, in no particular order", and to incorporate these lists into the combined chart in a meaningful way (by spreading out the points between all releases in the list). Of course users can change that at any time - just change the mode in the tool and re-submit. To rephrase your last sentence: I would rather see unranked lists submitted via the tool than no lists at all, or manual lists posted here or elsewhere which don't get counted towards the combined chart.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Well, we have to be flexible if issues come up, of course. I just don't know that having it unranked has great utility for an album of the year endeavour (almost 3 am here, up since 5 am yesterday, words not coming out right) -- unless later they choose to order the list or partially order it. Or what difference would using it make to this endeavour rather than just posting an unranked list if that is all one does? Maybe all get a point if they input their lists at your site, but that would just complicate things. I do see utility in that feature, and I still would rather see unranked lists than no lists at all.
But I want to encourage people to contribute to the album of the year, and I fear offering such a feature can distract from that and may offer an unnecessary out. If people want to post their unranked lists with or without your site's tool, I am fine with that, but I would encourage people to try to use some ranking for the purposes of this Album of the Year endeavour. The more who participate, the better. Of course, one good thing about entering it there unranked is that people may later choose to order them. So that may well help. I like the feature, for sure. One thing I have worried about with your tool is that it might seem to be more about using the tool and your site to people and improving the features than about the Prog Archives community coming together to choose and discuss our best list. But make no mistake, I really like and appreciate the tool and all your efforts. I was just a bit worried that this might seem too tool-focused to some. Edited by Logan - January 09 2024 at 03:59 |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I just wanted to get in the unranked option, as this was something that was keeping a few users from participating. I will continue to improve the usability and tweak how the results are displayed, but we can declare a feature freeze until the Aoty 2023 is done
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - January 09 2024 at 03:35 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
had not seen this while posting my last post. Quoting as this was the last post on the last page.
I do hope people do try to post in a way to enter the Album of the Year by ranking even a top two. For this exercise to work as I would hope, it needs as much collaboration as possible with members taking part in putting input towards the album of the year. Maybe some could start with that, or even I would say just by posting their unranked lists in this topic. Going forward, I think streamlining the process might help. For now I think some stability with the tool might help as the tool for this is to help collate the results for the Album of the Year, and to help people in listing those. When one adds more and more options, it can end up being more about the tool than the individuals coming together and working together as a community to shine a light on albums thought to be of worth. Just a thought. Edited by Logan - January 09 2024 at 03:34 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I too had to be encouraged to take part in the AOTY, in my case by Avestin. He had lots of recommendations that he thought I would like, and he was right. Aranis was a particularly memorable one for me, and Rational Diet, Far Corner....
I had hoped that this would have attracted a wider userbase, and that more would be enthusiastic about taking part, but I am very pleased to see various people whom I have had plenty of good times sharing music with form the Interactive Poll series taking part. For me having people like Lewian, Suitkees, and Nickie take part is great. But we're all used to lists, finding and sharing music. This attracts a certain kind of person. One person who has had a significant influence on my tastes opted not to take part, and that's fine too. I still would like to read people's unranked lists if they feel uncomfortable ranking them. It could be intimidating to some and some might not understand the process. For instance that one need not list 20, and that one need not start with a finalised list. In past AOTY polls, sometimes I would start with just a few (I have not participated in all since I became a collab). I would love to see more lists, more recommendations. and maybe some will have albums that few of us have heard of and turn some of us onto them though this thread. I like it at 20 for this. I would like to see another list later that calculates, say, based on the top 40, and indeed many more. Number one choice getting 40 points and so on. And I do want to see this list for the year as something that continues to grow and be tallied even past the date of when the official album of the year is announced. Oh, and right now I am listening to the album Distorted Rooms by Radian (released in September) due to a post in an interactive poll topic. I actually had checked out some music from it before that, but the track posted in the topic really caught my interest. |
||
Post Reply | Page <1234 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |