Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Your top most pretentious prog bands?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedYour top most pretentious prog bands?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 14:18
^Today we are in agreement.

Other labels I see applied that is abundantly arrogant is "soulless". Just because I do not hear something does not mean it isn't there. Different sounds and acts speak to different people.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 13:53
Hi,

Weird ... I do not think that anything in music is pretentious, other than the critics themselves ... we always think that something or other is better than this or that!

You do what you got to do, to get attention, if that is your game and desire. But in the end, you and I are not sitting here and saying that Mozart should have been the number ONE person in the list! Or Wagner! Or Verdi ... now let's talk about that ... 

My vote is NONE. They do not deserve that criticism, and we are not the Hall of Shame! We are about Progressive Music!


Edited by moshkito - February 09 2017 at 13:54
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Dopeydoc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 05 2016
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 1366
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 13:34
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

ELP & Wakeman were in a class of their own


Agree! But they happen to release some good albums though.
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 10:21
Can we evolve past this childish term? Its way more self-indulgent than any of the art in question. Get over yourselves already.
Back to Top
rockandbluesman7 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 04:22
It's a tough call there are a number of my faves  Jethro Tull, Yes, & Pink Floyd. Would you also include Marillion i guess so and yet another one i am trying to get my head around and to think it must be one of the longest tracks i have ever heard, overblown, contentious over the top, Transatlantic Whirlwind just on 80 minutes long.
I'll be honest with you still trying to come to grips with the song. In regards to Jethro Tull they are one of my faves i have a number of their albums and a glutton for punishment, their recent remastering/remixing 4 disc box sets Passion Play, War Child, Minstrel In The Gallery, Too Old To Rock and Roll and the 2 disc 5.1 surround sound set of Thick As A Brick. On the way too most likely in the same format will be Songs From The Wood. For better of for worse, a similar path to some of Yes's classics. The anniversary edition of The Yes Album in which you get 7 different versions of the one album! Fragile, Relayer, Close To The Edge, The Yes album & the recent Tales From Topographic Oceans, if i could use a Yes pun, talk about overblown, over the top too much to handle what were they thinking at the time? Who knows but the biggest surprise although there are only 4 tracks on the album totalling just on 80 minutes, the bluray edition although they are the same, with an odd live edit and singles talk about too much 4 songs a total 0f 12 and a half hours on bluray! In other words
36 tracks! It takes a lot of time to get through, Alan Parsons hmmmLOL
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24673
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 01:56
Yes and ELP. I have to look too far behind to find the others.

Edited by someone_else - February 09 2017 at 04:42
Back to Top
Mascodagama View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 01:52
Evidently there are very different understandings of what constitutes pretentiousness being employed by different posters. My own personal one is that pretentiousness is about pretence - specifically, pretending to operate on some kind of artistic or intellectual level that is not actually earned or achieved. e.g. Jon Anderson's Yes lyrics were frequently pretentious as they aspired to the status of poetry / philosophy without having any actual substance. Peter Hamill's lyrics with VdGG weren't pretentious because, although they had obvious literary and intellectual aspirations, Hamill had the substance to back it up - an actual poet not a pretend one.
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 00:20
Yes
The Moody Blues
Queen (but I don't consider them Prog)
Styx
ELP
VDGG
Gentle Giant
King Crimson
Dream Theater
Marillion
(......and I love 'em all, except Queen)
Back to Top
Rednight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4812
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 13:49
Hate the word "pretentious" in this thread because it seemed to be the main operative word that hack Robert Hilburn (former L.A. Times music critic) used from time to time to describe acts such as Yes and ELP back in the '70s and '80s. I mean, find some other word in a thesaurus already, pal. The guy was a real hose bag, and reading his reviews proved that continually.
"It just has none of the qualities of your work that I find interesting. Abandon [?] it." - Eno
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 13:22
Yes, they are pretentious as the band Yes.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
HosiannaMantra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2016
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 13:16
Does Trans-Siberian Orchestra count as a prog rock/metal band?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 13:11
Yes, Doc. A big bag of wind + rock= Prog! But God how I love it!
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20671
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 12:41
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

All of them.

You beat me to that reply......
by definition prog is pretentious.


LOL
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 12:35
All of them.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 10:23
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Pretentious? As in, let's say: "Dude, we're going to make the most amazing music ever and none shall try to do music after us"?
Or as in: "No, seriously, we're an important band in the history of music, our music should be taken seriously, stop making fun of us" ?
In the first case:
1) Yes was pretentious in 1974, at the time of Tales From Topographic Oceans (they get better after the tour)
2) ELP when releasing Works or even their triple-LP live album
3) Magma's first album which was a double LP (bold and audacious or simply goddamn megalomaniac?!)
4) Robert Fripp / King Crimson, who takes himself a bit too seriously for a while now (not that I won't listen to King Crimson's new material, if there's any plan to release it)
5) Rick Wakeman, which Hollywood-friendly take on Romanticism had always been a bit too much for my palate (on the other hand, he's a keyboard player...)
6) Triumvirat - see above.
7) Even Pink Floyd had their moments of pretentiousness (hey, let's face it, they did have, didn't they?)

I'm trying to add 3 other acts to make a Top Ten (looking towards some Prog-Metal bands...), but that will be for later.

the gigantic Pink Floyd live shows with flying pigs and whatnots definitely justify the attribute "pretentious"


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Lā, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 09:28
Pretentious? As in, let's say: "Dude, we're going to make the most amazing music ever and none shall try to do music after us"?
Or as in: "No, seriously, we're an important band in the history of music, our music should be taken seriously, stop making fun of us" ?
In the first case:
1) Yes was pretentious in 1974, at the time of Tales From Topographic Oceans (they get better after the tour)
2) ELP when releasing Works or even their triple-LP live album
3) Magma's first album which was a double LP (bold and audacious or simply goddamn megalomaniac?!)
4) Robert Fripp / King Crimson, who takes himself a bit too seriously for a while now (not that I won't listen to King Crimson's new material, if there's any plan to release it)
5) Rick Wakeman, which Hollywood-friendly take on Romanticism had always been a bit too much for my palate (on the other hand, he's a keyboard player...)
6) Triumvirat - see above.
7) Even Pink Floyd had their moments of pretentiousness (hey, let's face it, they did have, didn't they?)

I'm trying to add 3 other acts to make a Top Ten (looking towards some Prog-Metal bands...), but that will be for later.
Back to Top
CosmicVibration View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2014
Location: Milky Way
Status: Offline
Points: 1396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 06:54
Top band - Yes
Most pretentious top band - ELP
Back to Top
Son.of.Tiresias View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 23 2014
Location: Northern Hemisp
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 06:40
Originally posted by DDPascalDD DDPascalDD wrote:

I have never been able to understand why showing virtuosity at points is so bad. Those top musicians are able to consider if it fits the music or not most of the time. Apart from live shows, I really don't get what's so annoying???

I see your point I guess. But itīs not a question of virtuosity. On the contrary, the best music is full of virtuosity, in so many aspects, be it classical, jazz, rock, even pop (Beatles, ABBA), for me at least. Itīs all due to dullness, when bands get too self-indulgent, too pompous, playing pointless (too) long solos (to fill the space), pointless rambling and jumping here and there, aimless compositions... sacrificing melody and harmony for cachophony and pseudo virtuosity. Yah, when they get so damn serious, about themselves. Very few artists, even the best "prog" acts did not realize their limits, eventually.
Listener eventually gets a feeling he/she has been cheated. Thatīs why punk was born after 1974. Johnny Rotten hated boring pop music, probably the lame TOTP in the first place. But not necessarily ELP because exists a picture of him and Keith Emerson together laughing and having a good time. Emerson is pretentious for some but I never found his playing boring, in the 70īs to be exact. Later since the 90īs ELP just lost their magic, most of the time.  


Edited by Son.of.Tiresias - February 08 2017 at 09:32
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 06:18
1) ELP
2) Pink Floyd
3) Eloy
4) Barclay James Harmless
5) The Nice
6) Yes
7) Genesis
8) Tangerine Dream
9) Hawkwind
10) Triumvirat


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29684
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2017 at 06:08
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

ELP & Wakeman were in a class of their own
 
A fairly common view but Floyd and Genesis were just as bad accepting that generally their music has stood the test of time better than ELP and Wakeman.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.