Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fascism for Freedom
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFascism for Freedom

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2015 at 10:00
The two ideals, freedom and lack thereof, can't exist in their extremes together. They'd each have to apply only to certain parts of the policy or to certain parts of the population. For instance: Maybe everything is legal, except dissenting to the style of government, which is punishable by death. Maybe the government has cameras set up in every house and on every street corner to make sure that doesn't happen. Maybe everything is legal except for African Americans. etc.
Back to Top
Formentera Lady View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 20 2010
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1840
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2015 at 09:32
It is not possible because the concepts contradict each other.
Fascism always means discrimination: discrimination of people, groups, nations, cultures etc. from each other and in the course it also means gradation of the groups, nations etc.
 
Freedom on the other hand means a positive relationship among the people: freedom always means also the freedom of others. I would not be in a free society if I see people around me who are not free. So it contradicts discrimination and gradation, and therefore also the concept of fascism.
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2015 at 02:41
Looks like something Hans-Hermann Hoppe might come up with. For those who don't know, he's a libertarian philosopher who's come up with a classically liberal argument not just against parliamentary democracy but for absolute monarchy and other autocratic government forms. In short, he's the person who bridges the gap between Mises and Marinetti.

Far-right politics often play like an ideological version of Rule 34: If you can think of a political position existing somewhere in logical space, someone from that subculture will defend it!
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2015 at 00:46
I suppose the label might be slightly different, but I have to imagine as the leader of a fascist state you can do as you please.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2015 at 00:16
It wouldn't work if the freedom was for everyone. The majority would use their free doms to take away the free doms of others. The best thing about fascism is the lack of freedom for the plebs.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 20 2015 at 23:40
Is such a thing even possible?   And if so, would that represent some nightmarish totalitarian-enforced democratic utopia?   Forgive me if some science fiction author has written just such a novel (one could argue there are many;Orwell comes to mind, though that was by most standards a dark and tormented life, not the Grecian fantasms of idyllic myth), or if some tyrannic despot I don't know about already tried to lethally enforce peace and freedom (hey wait, that rings a bell).   Many of history's forced regimes must have, on some twisted level, thought they were doing what was best; What was necessary for their culture as they saw it.

But is the notion even tenable, and for that matter conceivable, that such a state could develop?   And how exactly would it look?


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.213 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.