Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 11:14 |
It's a fact as soon as all people who listen both agree that tubes are better. Nobody can pretends the contrary as it's so obvious. This is not a matter of taste.
It's better, that's all.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 11:07 |
oliverstoned wrote:
Yes, facts are the contary than this theory:
(i quote myself): "With the amp up, well implemented, you can enjoy voices, flutes, violins, trumpets, etc... with an incredible clarity, openess, softness, transparency, precense, natural, MATTER, etc... and NEUTRALITY. A good tube is not colored at all. "
|
That's OPINION, not FACT. But I don't doubt that there are very good tubes ... in fact, I love tubes.
|
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 10:55 |
Yes, facts are the contary than this theory:
(i quote myself):
"With the amp up, well implemented, you can enjoy voices, flutes, violins, trumpets, etc... with an incredible clarity, openess, softness, transparency, precense, natural, MATTER, etc... and NEUTRALITY. A good tube is not colored at all. "
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 10:22 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
oliverstoned:
Feel free to open a thread about the various types of amps ... it's an interesting subject. BTW: As a guitarist I have always prefered tube amps. Currently I use the Vox ToneLab SE, which simulates a tube amp + speaker environment by using a real (but slightly modified) tube.
|
I think the very fact that tube amps are revered by musicians for their distinctive sounds implies their unsuitability for hi-fi use, where a distinctive sound is counterproductive to transparency. NB that statement's based on theory rather than anything else; as of now I know next to nothing about the workings of amps. And also I realise the amps are tailored differently to their functions.
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 09:23 |
You're free to love digital, but believe me it's less good than analog.
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 09:15 |
Oliver: I love digital sound. I have vinyl records that I have been
listening to for years, that I have repurchased in digital format and
found there are sounds there that I have never heard before on my vinyl
copy (no, I don't mean remasters)
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 09:09 |
These high end soundcards for pc, usually have circuitry and/or
shielding to remove the interference from the other hardware of the pc.
As I said before my $300 DSP24 card outputed to my $200 klipsch 2.1
speaker system sounds much better than the far more expensive hifi
system in the lounge room. If I want to listen to music I sit at my
computer.
This is essentially what you are talking about. The klipsch system is
an amplified speaker set, so it would be the same as connecting it to
the amp in the lounge room
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 09:01 |
[QUOTE=MikeEnRegalia] oliverstoned:
Feel free to open a thread about the various types of amps ... it's an interesting subject.
Why not
BTW: As a guitarist I have always prefered tube amps. Currently I use the Vox ToneLab SE, which simulates a tube amp + speaker environment by using a real (but slightly modified) tube.
I don't know nothing about instruments and related devices, but i've heard that tubes amps have the preference of musicians, which doesn't surprises me!
cobb:
While I think that the analog outputs of GOOD sound cards are sufficient, for the sake of this discussion I was talking about digital interfaces to rule out any possible signal degradation by bad D/A converters or electronic pollutions of the sound card circuits by the computer components.
OK. But i think that computers are a great source of electric pollution, like digital devices, btw.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:56 |
oliverstoned:
Feel free to open a thread about the various types of amps ... it's an interesting subject. BTW: As a guitarist I have always prefered tube amps. Currently I use the Vox ToneLab SE, which simulates a tube amp + speaker environment by using a real (but slightly modified) tube.
cobb:
While I think that the analog outputs of GOOD sound cards are sufficient, for the sake of this discussion I was talking about digital interfaces to rule out any possible signal degradation by bad D/A converters or electronic pollutions of the sound card circuits by the computer components.
|
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:47 |
So we agree on most points, dear Mike.
I use the Jolida up as a wide band amp (i'm in a little room), but i've add a good subwoofer (Omega Magnat 380 with a 38cm driven by a 200 watts transistor amp) for bottom-low/extreme low. So it's a little like a bi amp with tube in the highs and transistor in the low.
I let you reorient the debate.
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:45 |
Microprocessor driven sound generation also has the added advantage of
being capable of sending digital stream directly to the amp (assuming the amp can handle
optical). This makes it even better- no signal loss and distortion
through wire cable.
Edited by cobb
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:41 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Yes - I think that I can rip my entire CD
collection to my PC in a lossless format and use Winamp to listen to
the songs. Provided that the soundcard is connected to a really good
amp & speakers using a digital interface, the music should sound
identical compared to playing it on a HiFi CD player, which is
connected to the same amp via a digital cable.
oliverstoned disagrees strongly, so I'm interested about other people's opinions about this. |
A cd player and a pc producing sound from its cd drive (or from file) both use the
same process to produce the analog signal that goes out the output
jacks. Both use microprocessors to control the signal and hardware to
convert the digital stream to audio signal. The cd player, though still
just a microprocessor, has a dedicated job, all the hardware has been
specifically set up to produce music, this is its only purpose.
Therefore if you have a soundcard that is specifically set up to
produce a (high quality) audio signal, the result should be the same.
Many soundcard manufacturers produce high end cards that will do this
job just as good as a high end cd player.
Edited by cobb
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:38 |
oliverstoned wrote:
"This added distortion is often referred to a "warm", "analog" or "70's" sound. While pleasant to most people, it is not an accurate playback of the original signal."
We are at the heart of the issue.
|
I indeed consider the amp the heart of all sound problems. NOT the digital source.
oliverstoned wrote:
True that tubes amps have higher distorsions rates on the paper than transistor ones. But this is NOT AT ALL a criteria for PERFORMANCE nad MUSICALITY. A GOOD tube amp like the one up reproduces the highs (the freq part that the human ear is the most sensistive to)with MUCH MORE ACCURACY than any transistor amp. The transistor makes ham raspe with the highs, which means it distors much more than tubes WHEN YOU LISTEN. ONLY RESULT MATTERS and i don't care about what is written on the paper. Distorsion rate is not the good criteria.
|
"distortion RATE" is indeed not the issue ... most tube amps have a higher distortion rate, but the distortion is more natural and pleasant for the ear. I actually agree about what you said about the better transparency of tube amps ... but that's not the topic of this thread.
oliverstoned wrote:
I suppose you have heard about pair and unpair harmonics. Here's the explanation.
With the amp up, well implemented, you can enjoy voices, flutes, violins, trumpets, etc... with an incredible clarity, openess, softness, transparency, precense, natural, MATTER, etc... and NEUTRALITY. A good tube is not colored at all. On another hand, tube amps are always a liitle "round" in the low and can lack of quickness in the low. The solution, which is the royal way, is the bi-amplification with a good transistor in the low and a good tube in the highs, and a good preamp (transistor, tube or hybrid, there's no rule). But that's another story.
|
Yes indeed, it's another story.
oliverstoned wrote:
So, this statement: "it is not an accurate playback of the original signal" is untrue, considering a good tube amp like the one up.
|
Yes it is true - the playback might actually be more accurate than a good transistor amp (and MUCH more accurate than a cheap amp), but the added distortion still changes the signal. But I admit that this is not really a problem, because there is NO amp which can give you a 100% accurate reproduction of the signal.
|
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:20 |
"This added distortion is often referred to a "warm", "analog" or "70's" sound. While pleasant to most people, it is not an accurate playback of the original signal."
We are at the heart of the issue.
True that tubes amps have higher distorsions rates on the paper than transistor ones. But this is NOT AT ALL a criteria for PERFORMANCE nad MUSICALITY. A GOOD tube amp like the one up reproduces the highs (the freq part that the human ear is the most sensistive to)with MUCH MORE ACCURACY than any transistor amp. The transistor makes ham raspe with the highs, which means it distors much more than tubes WHEN YOU LISTEN.
ONLY RESULT MATTERS and i don't care about what is written on the paper. Distorsion rate is not the good criteria.
I suppose you have heard about pair and unpair harmonics. Here's the explanation.
With the amp up, well implemented, you can enjoy voices, flutes, violins, trumpets, etc... with an incredible clarity, openess, softness, transparency, precense, natural, MATTER, etc... and NEUTRALITY. A good tube is not colored at all.
On another hand, tube amps are always a liitle "round" in the low and can lack of quickness in the low.
The solution, which is the royal way, is the bi-amplification with a good transistor in the low and a good tube in the highs, and a good preamp (transistor, tube or hybrid, there's no rule).
But that's another story.
So, this statement:
"it is not an accurate playback of the original signal" is untrue, considering a good tube amp like the one up.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:18 |
cobb wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Edit: Please let's keep amp & speakers out of this discussion - the topic here is PC vs. top-notch CD player, both digitally connected to an amp.
|
I don't get the point of your thread with this edit. Are you just asking whether you think the pc can act as the player connected to your lounge room hifi, just as well as cd player can? Sure, why not? Isn't this the whole purpose of the new media centre pc's?
|
Yes - I think that I can rip my entire CD collection to my PC in a lossless format and use Winamp to listen to the songs. Provided that the soundcard is connected to a really good amp & speakers using a digital interface, the music should sound identical compared to playing it on a HiFi CD player, which is connected to the same amp via a digital cable.
oliverstoned disagrees strongly, so I'm interested about other people's opinions about this.
|
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:12 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Edit: Please let's keep amp & speakers
out of this discussion - the topic here is PC vs. top-notch CD player,
both digitally connected to an amp. |
I don't get the point of your thread with this edit. Are you just
asking whether you think the pc can act as the player connected to your
lounge room hifi, just as well as cd player can? Sure, why not? Isn't
this the whole purpose of the new media centre pc's?
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 08:00 |
oliverstoned wrote:
on such a transparent amp, and it'll reveal how bad it is
|
Please, don't make this a discussion tube vs. transistor either ... I actually prefer the sound of good tube amps to that of transistor amps. But they also have disadvantages. As noted in one of the documents I posted in the Big digital thread, tube amps actually distort the signal. This added distortion is often referred to a "warm", "analog" or "70's" sound. While pleasant to most people, it is not an accurate playback of the original signal.
|
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 07:51 |
As soon as a signal is encoded to PCM, as long as it stays PCM (and at the same bit depth, frequency etc. etc.) there's no quality loss possible unless it's being transported implausibly long distances. Unless anyone has houses several kilometres across it can always be assumed to be a perfect digital copy. Assuming the data can be read accurately (ie. bit perfect), which is actually easier on a computer based drive since it has more buffering, and easier still when it's actually stored on the hard drive, then the digital output of the soundcard will be identical to the digital input, even on the worst soundcard. As Mike says, the analogue output's another story - the souncard on this laptop I'm using is absolutely terrible.
It's also worth pointing out that when someone concentrates with his eyes, the ears become less sensitive (an example being when people watch TV and turn it up much to the annoyance of others), so when using a computer the nuances of sound will be less noticeable anyway.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21467
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 07:49 |
oliverstoned wrote:
Be aware that in real hifi, the smallest details are important. With such a bad source, it cannnot work. Sorry. |
Be aware that in the digital world it doesn't matter if the source is a CD player or a computer, if the bits are identical.
|
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: September 02 2005 at 07:39 |
Put this crappy box:
on such a transparent amp, and it'll reveal how bad it is
Be aware that in real hifi, the smallest details are important. With such a bad source, it cannnot work.
Sorry.
|
|