Beatles |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Topic: Beatles Posted: May 04 2005 at 16:24 |
|
I'm afraid he's true, for one time. |
||
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 12 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3047 |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 16:11 | |
good point karny |
||
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 02:46 | |
Yeh put em in. If you want me to pick i can easily go through the archives & exclude some band that are not prog as much as people make out the Beatles arn't |
||
lunaticviolist
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 17 2005 Status: Offline Points: 478 |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 02:39 | |
What the hell! They're not prog, but put 'em in the archives just so we can end this discussion and move on! |
||
My recent purchases:
|
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28283 |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 02:19 | |
NO.It would be misleading to include The Beatles in here.But yes they did have an influence on a lot of prog bands thats for sure.
|
||
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 02:17 | |
Ah well get m@x & Rony to get real & include them Edited by Karnevil9 |
||
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: May 04 2005 at 02:12 | |
IT HAS'NT EVENED OUT AT ALL SOME TWATS BANGED THE NEGATIVE VOTES UP.
|
||
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 12 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3047 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 23:38 | |
not a horrible idea |
||
alan_pfeifer
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2004 Status: Offline Points: 823 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 22:19 | |
I feel like a broken record: Various Artists. |
||
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 12 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3047 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 22:15 | |
I am glad to see this poll has evened out. The Beatles must be kept out of the archives!
Then we can move on, and get rid of Dream Theater. I'd even trade the Beatles for Dream Theater in the archives. |
||
marktheshark
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 24 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1695 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 21:38 | |
I would probably put Rain on that list too. Mainly for the edgy guitar chord progressions and Paul and Ringo's stop and go unison at the end. |
||
maani
Special Collaborator Founding Moderator Joined: January 30 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2632 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 21:15 | |
All: Yes, we've had this discussion before. Here is the quick answer. According to Max (who is the final arbiter here), in order to qualify for the site, a band need only have one album that is prog. However, that entire album must be prog, as ultimately defined by Max and Rony. In this regard, even Sgt. Pepper would not qualify, since although some (maybe even most) of it is prog - or at very least "proto-prog" - some of it is not. Personally, I do not consider most of it prog, or necessarily even proto-prog (which does not detract whatsoever from its greatness or influence). From my own personal perspective, although The Beatles were certainly experimental, and brought quite a few new ideas and sounds to rock, even their most "prog" stuff is ultimately "proto-prog" - though unquestionably highly influential. We can agree to disagree here, but I would include the following songs as at very least "proto-prog" - and my list goes back even further than anything mentioned thus far (note that I am using the American album chronology here): Rubber Soul Yesterday & Today Revolver Sgt. Pepper Magical Mystery Tour The Beatles Yellow Submarine Abbey Road The Beatles were unquestionably, unarguably the most influential group of all time (and, with the exception of Frank Zappa, the most experimental until prog began in earnest). However, they are not "prog" themselves. Indeed, they probably belong in a pantheon unto themselves. Let's not burden them with having "founded" any particular genre. Peace. |
||
Anthemof2112
Forum Newbie Joined: May 01 2005 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 20:31 | |
As much as I love the Beatles, I just don;t think they had enough elements to be considered "prog." Is being strange like in "Blue Jay Way" enough to be considered prog? I respectivley have to say no. |
||
Keep on Rocking in the free world.
|
||
Yams
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 16 2004 Status: Offline Points: 198 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 17:46 | |
No. Stop stretching the meaning of Progressive Rock.
|
||
Yanns
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 25 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 999 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 17:42 | |
Yeah, they should be here. True, only Revolver on was "prog" (or at least the beginnings of it.) But every album should be included as well. But they should not be panned by prog lovers.
|
||
The Prognaut
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 14 2004 Location: Somewhere Else Status: Offline Points: 1492 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 17:35 | |
I wanted to vote "NO", but the "Piss off Karney" option was more than tempting! BTW, The Beatles just don't belong to the archives, sorry.
|
||
break the circle
reset my head wake the sleepwalker and i'll wake the dead |
||
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 26 2005 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 10616 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 17:34 | |
They were 100% progressive, before the word was even invented. They were a hard rocking band since their Hamburg days Ergo: they were progrock. And don't you dare disagree with me ... |
||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 15:18 | |
A definite no as far as I am concerned. I have the greatest respect for their mausic and their achievements. I love their album sand singles a lot. There is no doubt they were a major influence on many prog and non-prog bands alike. They were never a prog band though. The Beatles are already very well catered for on the web, there is no need or benefit in adding them here, it would simply distort the site. The Beatles were undoubtedly a major band, they were not though a major prog band. AsPeter says, it's a can of worms. |
||
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 29 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1324 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 15:05 | |
I said among the first
|
||
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight |
||
marktheshark
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 24 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1695 |
Posted: May 03 2005 at 14:59 | |
First group to use a moog synthesizer? Grab your socks! It's Hey, Hey Were The Monkees! 1967 on their Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn and Jones Ltd album. How's that? Edited by marktheshark |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |