Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - are The Grateful Dead that prog related?yes / not?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedare The Grateful Dead that prog related?yes / not?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
zicIy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 413
Direct Link To This Post Topic: are The Grateful Dead that prog related?yes / not?
    Posted: June 10 2008 at 16:45
imho, Deads are deserved a place at PA prog related, or proto prog the list.Cool
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 16:54
I love the Dead but I don't think they're either Proto or Related other than being one of the most influential psych bands..  they certainly have several excellent progressive albums (Allah, Terrapin) but in order to be ProgRelated you'd have to show in what way they're related to prog  ..I think the question would come down this;  were the Dead influenced by the English prog movement and is that reflected in their more composed albums between 73 and 77?  If so, how much impact is heard or is it more of an internal progression in the group








Edited by Atavachron - June 10 2008 at 16:57
Back to Top
zicIy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:05
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I love the Dead but I don't think they're either Proto or Related other than being one of the most influential psych bands..  they certainly have several excellent progressive albums (Allah, Terrapin) but in order to be ProgRelated you'd have to show in what way they're related to prog


 
as you said - " they certainly have several exellent progressive albums" - as well. i like to add Live / Dead and The Mars Hotel (my fav one ).
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:10
yes but many bands did, at one point almost every rock album out of Britain was in some way progressive, but were the Dead related to prog directly in some way?  They may have been, but the evidence is thin.
Back to Top
zicIy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:23
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 .... were the Dead influenced by the English prog movement ....






 
Sorry, but i really dont care about The Grateful Deadīs  less influenced by  or to that English prog movement. English prog movement is awesome enough without Deads (or even Zappa, or Steely Dan for example). i think these best  American (prog or not?) bands/ artists were so different than English bands/artists that  an influence was not possible at all, and, also, i dont see any of the reasons why should to be.


Edited by zicIy - June 10 2008 at 17:26
Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:24
No but  your right about  The Mars Hotel now that's a good album but Prog ?? No 
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:29
structure structure and more structure... with some notable exceptions... structure is a key for prog.  Not improvising..    a bad fit in my opinion. 

Page #29 from the sacred text brought down from the Mt. Sinai of prog by M@X himself.. and interpreted by his priests...

'Prog Related can be stretched to fit damn near any group you can think of the late 60's and 70's...  Prog Related is for groups that best illustrate the INFLUENCE of the progressive rock movement on those that were not'
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 17:31
 ^ precisely
Back to Top
BroSpence View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 18:49
Probably not.  Their first couple albums were sort of psychedelic, then they just mixed their love of acid with country rock.  They'd jam at their shows, but not much on albums.  And they weren't very progressive in nature.  
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 19:45
I'm not intimately familiar with all their albums.  I have Anthem of the Sun and Terrapin Station.  One psychedelic for sure and the other with a lot of proggy moments.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2008 at 20:16
My problem with considering them prog-related is that their best albums (Workingman's Dead, American Beauty) are anything but. 
Back to Top
soundsweird View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 408
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2008 at 01:21
One can count on this same thread being resurrected at least once per year. Talk about beating a Dead horse!!
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2008 at 03:46
Yep, here we go again.
 
The search function is your friend.
 
Just so you know, though, I say no.  There isn't much in the way of prog in their music.  Innovative, yes.  Artistic, yes.  Groundbreaking psychedelic, yes.  Progressive rock, no.
 
Don't feel bad though.  I'd tell you the same thing about Pink Floyd if they hadn't hired that Gilmour fellow....
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2008 at 07:43
Originally posted by soundsweird soundsweird wrote:

One can count on this same thread being resurrected at least once per year. Talk about beating a Dead horse!!

You should be Grateful it only gets resurrected at least once per year.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Seyo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 08 2004
Location: Bosnia
Status: Offline
Points: 1320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2008 at 07:52
GD can be considered inclusion in PA - they definitely deserve to be mentioned in the site like this one.
Concerning the genre category, they can be part of either proto-prog (along with related Jefferson Airplane), prog folk, space-psychedelic, eclectic prog or prog-related...
Back to Top
zicIy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2008 at 04:03
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

My problem with considering them prog-related is that their best albums (Workingman's Dead, American Beauty) are anything but. 
iīv been reading in some article (long time ago, i cant recall from where) that after Deadīs albums as s/t debut, then great albums as Anthem Of The Sun, Aoxomoxoa, and Live / Dead, the band went to indepted to Warner Bros, and although they were recognized as one great live act already, Warner Bros were asking for more commercial albums, so The Grateful Dead with that intention were recorded, (imho, with pleasure as everything what GD did do), that Workingmanīs Dead and then, imho, much better American Beauty the album (awesome Box Of Rain the song, one of the most beautiful songs in whole ROCK ever, imho); then Warner Bros were satisfied. of course i donīt know thatīs true story or not, but seems to be.
 
 
 
btw, i like those albums, but i disagree that Workingmanīs Dead and American Beauty are their best moments. although my fav album by them is studio one (From The Mars Hotel), i think that their best albums are their live albums, as double vinyl Live / Dead (great spacey Dark Star the song - about 20 minutes long), than their second double vinyl s/t live album, from 1971, previously titled by the band as Skullf**k, but this title, unfortunately, was rejected by Warner Bros, also their  next, three vinyls (imho, that was very progressive at that time) the live album Europeī72 (that original title "Europe On Five Thousand Dollars At Day" was rejected by Warner Bros too, probably WB was a bit conservative at that time). their gigs were 3 hours or 5 hours long; letīs imagine some great live act of today to play 5 hours on the stage, thatīs no possible, and probably thatīs the reason why "once time per year" one  topic about The Grateful Dead is gonna be "resurrected" on this site. Smile


Edited by zicIy - June 12 2008 at 04:33
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2008 at 09:44
In my opinion, they absolutely deserve a place here. Proto-prog and prog-related categories are NOT prog, so there's no point of saying "oh, they are not prog".

I agree long psyche jams are not the best material for inclusion here but...one prog album merits inclusion in prog-related, let alone a few more facts that can be attached to the band, like groundbreaking/pioneering new sounds and being very eclectic in their style(s) Anyone who was able to compose Terrapin (a lightyear away from spontaneous jam) should be received on PA with open hands; it's not less prog then best Genesis moments.

So, there's no point in "stretching" the  Prog Related so it could "fit damn near any group you can think of the late 60's and 70's" ... The Dead deserves recognition.


Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2008 at 10:21
The problem is, Moris, that many site members seem to completely disregard those two small words, 'related' and 'proto', and think that every single band or artist included in our database should automatically be considered prog. I used to be a big supporter of those two categories, until I saw how controversial they could be, and even lead to unpleasant incidents.

Personally, the only suggestions for addition to PP or PR that I disagree with are those of artists like Phil Collins, whose sole relation to prog is to have been members of a prog band, but whose solo output has nothing to do with our beloved genre. As for the Dead, I am anything but an expert on them, therefore I trust the judgment of those people who - like you - think they deserve a spot here.
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2008 at 11:38
I know GRATEFUL DEAD produced some psychedelic albums in 67/68....they added some ''prog'' touches on albums like BLUES FROM ALLAH, but a limit should be drawed to which bands should be added to PA database.  Otherwise it's no longer progarchives, but simply rock archives.
 
I know Jefferson Airplane or the Doors are already included here, so why not next adding the BYRDS, FLYING BURRITOS BROTHERS and other NEIL YOUNG.. I am sure i will be able to find a ''prog touch'' here and there. My point is these bands are not prog., proto-prog whatever you want to name them and should not even be thought of being added on PA.......otherwise you change the name of PA. and open the doors to everyone that play some rock.  
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2008 at 15:05
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

In my opinion, they absolutely deserve a place here. Proto-prog and prog-related categories are NOT prog, so there's no point of saying "oh, they are not prog".

I agree long psyche jams are not the best material for inclusion here but...one prog album merits inclusion in prog-related, let alone a few more facts that can be attached to the band, like groundbreaking/pioneering new sounds and being very eclectic in their style(s) Anyone who was able to compose Terrapin (a lightyear away from spontaneous jam) should be received on PA with open hands; it's not less prog then best Genesis moments.

So, there's no point in "stretching" the  Prog Related so it could "fit damn near any group you can think of the late 60's and 70's" ... The Dead deserves recognition.




the stretching goes back to a comment .. no names.. but it comes from a member of the admin team who decide such things unless M@X unilaterally ok's them because ..well... he is M@X.  Some time back  the issue of Steely Dan came up for inclusion here... one of the MAIN reasons they have not been accepted here.. though their music fits MANY of the things the geek squads here check off on for deciding it it is prog or not.  Thatreason.. probably the main reason they are not even in PR.. when they can easily be put in a fully prog sub-genre (J-R or Xover) is that 'they are not KNOWN to have ever been associated with the prog movement'  That rationale cuts to the quick as to why the Dead IS a stretch to be here.  The thing people have to understand about PR is that groups are not judged solely on their music.. for many of the reasons that Raff stated...  you are in fact talking degress of prog.. associations with prog.. you can't simply judge whether they are prog or not... hell.. they wouldn't be considered FOR PR if they were prog hahahha.  Thus the problem.. the problem that has always surrounded PR...  it is and cannot ever escape being.. an 'if x then y' or 'if not x.. then no way in hell y' hahhaha.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.