It's too freaking loud !!! |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Posted: October 31 2010 at 07:18 | |
Oh, I thought you meant dynamics within a song, that is why I was confused. |
||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: October 31 2010 at 07:20 | |
Clarity is not my forte
|
||
Big Ears
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 08 2005 Location: Hants, England Status: Offline Points: 727 |
Posted: November 03 2010 at 05:25 | |
Have you heard the Mind's Eye cd by Stiltskin? It's recorded far too loud and the distortion is massive. If ever there was an argument for remastering an album, this is it.
|
||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: November 03 2010 at 05:54 | |
I would recommend you not play CDs with your turntable. But as someone who grew up with LPs and totally embraced CDs even though many were really crappy at first. Have you tried the volume control? It's really a bit of an odd complaint, but you are on record as hating CDs in the first place, so I applaud you for your consistency. And of course no disrespect intended. |
||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: November 03 2010 at 07:47 | |
It varies from album to album. CDs can be mastered louder than vinyls while the quality remains the same, they can be mastered too loud - adding more compression, reducing dynamics - or they can be re-mastered less loud - less loud, increasing the dynamic range. It's up to those who decide how the CD should sound. I don't know much about KT Tungstall, but guessing that it's a mainstreamy alternative band, it wouldn't surprise me if they opted for the overly compressed sound that is common in that genre. Except for a elitary niche of audiophile artists that exists in most genres to varying degrees.
|
||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: November 03 2010 at 08:36 | |
I don't mind the loudness of some bands which started their work in digital era - The Mars Volta and Muse made an art form of it. However, remastered old recording sometimes can be awful: instead of a big homogenic lump of sound I have a feeling I'm listening to a pile of very thin layers - for example early Bowie albums, or Tull's Aqualung. There's an extra 'oomph', but acoustic guitars are horrible.
|
||
topographicbroadways
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 20 2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5575 |
Posted: November 08 2010 at 11:53 | |
i did an experiment once importing files of songs recorded in different decades from the 70's up to the 00's into a DAW and found when i got to about 1994 a lot of digital clipping started emerging and as you move forward from that point dynamic range disappears more and more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war
|
||
|
||
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 26 2008 Location: Declined Status: Offline Points: 16715 |
Posted: November 08 2010 at 12:12 | |
Already posted, and the loudness war is really overrated. It wrecks a few CDs by overzealous bands, yes, but those aren't CDs that I have any interest in listening to, and you probably don't either, so why does it matter?
|
||
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
||
topographicbroadways
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 20 2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5575 |
Posted: November 08 2010 at 12:31 | |
yes sorry i didn't read the whole post and as a sound engineer it definitely bothers me but to most people it probably wouldn't either way i do think it's interesting and it is ruining music i listen to some modern bands and notice it a lot when i listen on good headphones especially in heavier music
|
||
|
||
notesworth
Forum Groupie Joined: June 03 2010 Location: Mississippi Status: Offline Points: 98 |
Posted: November 08 2010 at 12:43 | |
All I know is the loudness war turns me off new music. If I like new music it's in spite of the bad mastering. I want to hear something with more dynamics than my MIDI keyboard.
I'm not an audiophile. I'm fine with 128kbps mp3s on my iPod. I put my iPod on shuffle sometimes and I'll hear an older hard rock song with the volume where I want it, then some newer mellow song comes on 10dB louder. This is the first time I've seen anyone defend the loudness war.
|
||
Hawkwise
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 31 2008 Location: Ontairo Status: Offline Points: 4119 |
Posted: November 08 2010 at 13:00 | |
|
||
|
||
himtroy
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 20 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1601 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 01:47 | |
I could heavily agree that the loudness war turns me off to new music. Even later King Crimson...I put in on and its just so f'ing compressed that is retains absolutely no dynamics. It certainly helps to go live with bands from this era.
|
||
Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance. |
||
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 11 2007 Location: SanDiegoTijuana Status: Offline Points: 4373 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 01:55 | |
Loudness: Another symptom of post-89 degeneracy.
Whereas tape benefited from natural compression and early digital recording exhibited judiciousness when dealing with the increased dynamic range, modern attention whores can't help but turn everything into a loud pile of digitized tosh. Take a gander at a waveform for some current atrocity then compare it to a pre-89 treasure. Not only is the music itself a piss-poor imitation, but the sonic properties reflect the muddied frenzy of this aberrant age. |
||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 02:07 | |
I believe it's the "Loudness War"
I assume if I read this thread before I posted this many people have probably brought it up already Yeah, labels keep cranking up the volume (because what's more awesome than being louder!?) and many albums sound like crap thanks to it. Especially remasters of older ones. |
||
himtroy
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 20 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1601 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 02:23 | |
Ha. Very recently a friend of mine was for some reason checking out the sonic properties of a Wolfmother album. The song "Woman" was literally a square block of compression. So bad!
|
||
Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance. |
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32530 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 07:27 | |
So are you suggesting that the post-89 albums of pre-89 bands are crap? Old bands have adopted new technology. |
||
TheGazzardian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 11 2009 Location: Canada Status: Online Points: 8726 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 11:29 | |
Some bads still have the common sense to master their albums properly :)
Also, apparently vinyl is immune to the loudness war because if you cut the grooves too deep then you have a hole in your vinyl. At least that's what my roommate tells me.
|
||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 12:08 | |
1) A lot of times vinyl records these days are pressed from CD masters because vinyl is a good way to get unwitting people to spend a lot of money to feel superior. Sometimes if the band really cares and they have the money, it will be a separate master.
2) The loudness war is mostly a result of radio airplay. Human perceive something that is louder as being better, at least if it's slightly louder and the things being compared are similar. So slowly the song waveform became a block. But things don't have to have cavernous gaps in the waveform to be good (http://soundcloud.com/warp-records/brian-eno-2-forms-of-anger-small-craft-on-a-milk-sea) Example of good modern mastering. But you have to figure there's a lot of variety in the instrumentation here. Too much really loud distorted guitatrs will just be a wall of piss, to me. (re: Modern Heavy Rock/Post-grunge) 3) Remasters are often louder than the originals, but it is equally about getting a good stereo mix down, too. These days in 5.1 or maybe 7.1. Case in point: Nine Inch Nails's Pretty Hate Machine remaster. Granted, if you like the really 80s sounds-so-distant-it's-from-another-room goth production, you might not care for the remaster. But the mixing is so much more interesting. The songs actually have presence now. Seems to me like some people long for the days of mono and weak recordings. Why? |
||
Negoba
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 24 2008 Location: Big Muddy Status: Offline Points: 5208 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:38 | |
What people call "loudness" here is how much of the sonic space is filled up. Some modern artists have all the space filled up all the time and can do it well by varying what occupies that space. The other thing that compression does is make you feel like you're physically closer to the band or the instrument being compressed. And some music sounds like crap when it feels like you're in a closet with all the instruments. It's also a nice contrast if a track seems very close and personal while another is more open and at a healthier distance.
OTOH, many of us listen on small stereos at work or in the car for alot of our listening time. Wide dynamic range sucks in those situations. A little headroom is good, but parts that are almost inaudible are just annoying. If you're in a concert hall or in front of a good stereo system with nothing else interfering with the sound space, dynamics are great.
Anyway, carry on.
|
||
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: December 22 2010 at 14:19 | |
Great post Stoney, and the first phrase is pricesless |
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |