Music Appreciation |
Post Reply | Page <1234 14> |
Author | |||
The Sleepwalker
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 03 2009 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 15141 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 09:10 | ||
Reviewing is not about being objective at all. It can't be objective. If it was objective, you were only allowed to describe what the album is and what is featured on the album, but not if it's done in a good way or if it's done in a bad way. Opinions are opinions, you can't change that. I personally don't see much good in Dream Theater, and I don't consider their music to be better than let's say three stars. This is mainly because of the wall of complicated stuff and over technical soloing etc. I hear no heart in the music. What I said is not meant to bash DT however. I can see why someone would rate DT albums 4 or 5 stars, as it in the end all comes down to tastes. If you disagree with someone, that's fine. This whole thread seems like a whole lot of fanboyism to me though. If someone would rate Pink Floyd's WYWH one star, that's fine with me. If he can give me some arguments for disliking the album I wouldn't mind it at all, even though I find it a 5 star album myself. |
|||
|
|||
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 13 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3834 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 09:26 | ||
Dude, you are completely out of line. There is no such thing as good or bad music, and you are pretty ignorant if you don't think that. There is only WHAT YOU CONSIDER GOOD OR BAD MUSIC. What the hell gives you the right to say what is good and bad? People are entitled to their opinions. You may not agree with them, but it doesn't mean you are right and they are wrong.
I personally dislike Dream Theater. I find them cheesy and masturbatory. BUT I wouldn't dream of saying somebody is wrong for liking them. |
|||
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg |
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 09:33 | ||
This is wrong. You should know that the concept of objectivity appeared in the philosophy of exact science not postulating the unreliability of a point of view (meaning a subjective perspective), but the unreliability of the the point of view which is involved in the system under observation. Therefore objectivity means that the point of view is observing from the exteriour of the system and not affecting it at all, giving reliability to the scientific experiment that is being done. Think of a microbiological experiment where you manipulate the materials with your bare hands, as opposed to a microbiological experiment where everything is happening in a perfectly septic environment; this is the best analogy. |
|||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 09:43 | ||
From Merriam-Webster: Objectivity - expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations Subjectivity- peculiar to a particular individual <subjective judgments> (2) : modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background <a subjective account of the incident> We're not talking about science or philosophy here. We're talking more about journalistic objectivity / subjectivity. It is simple enough. |
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:01 | ||
That doesn't contradict me at all. Yes, some people's background, experience, ideology, feelings, etc. may affect their view on a matter, but that doesn't mean that it happens in 100% of the situations. Nobody has ever demonstrated that. What I was contradicting was your verdict that "objective opinion" is an oxymoron (meaning that people's feelings, etc. always affect their view). See, it's simple. Of course this doesn't mean that I don't agree with you on most of what we're talking about is subjective opinion. Most, but not all. |
|||
A Person
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:25 | ||
What annoys me is when people give low or high ratings without real justification, it doesn't make for a very helpful review.
|
|||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:32 | ||
You like BC&SL.
Some people do not. So what? |
|||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20030 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:39 | ||
Yep, that's the real point here. There's nothing wrong with a one-star review providing the reviewer gives his or her reasons and it's not just a rant.
|
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:40 | ||
|
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:45 | ||
WOW! is it me or this thread is seriously focusing on me?
|
|||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:48 | ||
You're a celebrity Pablo!
Tell 'em to quit hatin'. |
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:53 | ||
Seriously, I don't understand people sometimes. I think they seriously prefer a 1 star without review, and not because of the weighting, simply because they can't see it being posted! haha....
Into more seriousness, did I really say the music in general was bad? I just said that it's the same ol' story, the musicians are fantastic, but like Ivan has mentioned in some of his reviews, that alone doesn't make a good record at all.
I did state clear that I was giving 1 star because I found BC&SL to be DT's poorest album.
I'm not sure why am I wasting my time here, though... Edited by The Quiet One - February 25 2010 at 10:54 |
|||
TheGazzardian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 11 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 8685 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 10:59 | ||
I have to admit that I find this thread somewhat shocking in it's existence. With all the things in the world there are to get passionate about and all the things in the world to make a fuss about, a single 1 star review does NOT seem to fit into that area for me.
Even as someone who loves this site and wants to see it thrive and exist for years to come, I don't see how a 1 star review should even matter. Read it, understand what they are saying. Move on? If you don't agree, great. There are other reviews that applaud the album. If you want to read about how good it is, then go there. There are people on this site who have different viewpoints, and as far as I am concerned, the more viewpoints there are on a single album, the better this site is, because it's providing more balanced information. To imply that a reviewer is clueless, doesn't know what is talking about, is being unfair, just because you don't like his rating, to me comes across as very crass and selfish. I get all your analogies about "I wouldn't rate this this way because of ____". But I disagree. Heck, in response to your first post, I'm still not sure if I would give Brain Salad Surgery two stars or three. Dose that mean that I am clueless? For sure, I understand it's relevance in the prog world, but if I ever reach the point where I'm writing a review about it, I will be writing it based on it's musical merits and how much it affected me. Should we all start giving Britney Spears a lot of applause because her albums are much loved and have influenced others? Popularity does not necessarily mean value.
|
|||
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 26 2006 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:04 | ||
To Davetheslave: don't take it so personally, after all it's just music. |
|||
|
|||
presdoug
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 24 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 8618 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:13 | ||
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:38 | ||
Ok, Davetheslave. I'll contact you so we can plan an alibi for what should be done about this... We have to think it thouroughly though... I wouldn't want you to end up in the can for longer than a music-related crime is worth....
If we had to create a thread for every case where we don't agree with a review, there'd be nothing else to talk about on this forum. But we don't. We learned loooooooong ago that this music appreciation and reviewing thing is up to each person's tastes and knowledge....
The album is not pergfect anyway. I gave it a 5 but I'm starting to feel like lowering it one star. And DT has released a one-star album once.
|
|||
|
|||
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 26 2008 Location: Declined Status: Offline Points: 16715 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:41 | ||
While we're talking about subjectivity, I have to admit that my mind rebels when I consider the thought that Beethoven is equal to Nickelback, even though I know that once people start shouting subjectivity subjectivity it gets difficult to prove. Similarly, there are many reviews of Trout Mask Replica which state that there is nothing there and/or Captain Beefheart was trying to make music that nobody would ever actually like (with the implication that all avant fans are fooling themselves into eating sh*t so they feel clever). While I don't think that anybody is obligated to like avant-garde music, even though my sarcastic jokes may cause you to think otherwise, this opinion of course is woefully ignorant of the history of avant-garde music and is also extremely condescending. Sometimes I wonder if I'm doing the same thing, but pop music makes me angry enough that I can't really maintain the though.
However, it is possible to achieve a degree of "objectivity" in reviews by considering whether or not people who are different from yourself might like it. Obviously it's not objective in the scientific sense, but it's worth noting as being different from say "This is my opinion and that's it".
Well I make fun of you, so I guess I had that one coming. ;-) And you'll never see a DT review from me. I may be petty, but I'm not petty enough to buy an album I'm pretty sure I won't like just so I can give it a negative review and bring down the PA score a fraction of a percent.
|
|||
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|||
SaltyJon
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 08 2008 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 28772 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:42 | ||
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 11:56 | ||
While I agree that pretty much nothing is better than Beethoven (maybe Bach), and ESPECIALLY Nickelback, and while I also agree that it's to easy to throw the "subjectivity" excuse to disguise complete lack of a reason or actual ideas about what one likes or does not like, it's still true that, under specific conditions, subjectivity reigns supreme. Again, we all know that musically, Beethoven is 93872932 miles more advanced, elaborated, complex than most (all?) pop music (including prog and even your beloved avant garde rock here), but for someone, Nickelback might actually be better. Yes. If that someone is looking for a particular something in music that good old Ludwig can't provide but the post-grunge boremasters can, he/she will rightfully declare that, for his purposes and under his circumstances, the Bonn composer has been easily beaten by the Arkansas (or wherever, they look like Arkansas) boys...
After all, in most cases, you can't dance to Beethoven.... (and please people, no smart comments here about how you can actually dance to his music. I'm talking about in the real world with real people).
|
|||
|
|||
Failcore
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 27 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4625 |
Posted: February 25 2010 at 12:45 | ||
I think the various sounds coming my computer are the best music ever. All this prog crap can't compare. Listen to that complexity, man!
|
|||
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234 14> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |