Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Boston/Journey
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBoston/Journey

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2005 at 00:19

OK, who had a hard time, understanding what I was saying?  

I think only stoney adressed this one ...

 ... which is basically, yes, most of Journey sucked, and I don't think they should be included on overall contribution, but have you heard the excellent first album which is basically by a different band, under the same name?

... The music is nothing like the Journey of Open Arms & Don't Stop Believin ... it's damn good (I'd give it a high three star rating) ...  do yourself a favour and check it out if you stumble upon it ... surely as proggers we all know that the same set of musicians who produced brilliant prog can go on to make bland pop ... is it so impossible to believe that a pre-Steve Perry Journey was a good prog band?

Anyway, this is the last I'll say on the issue ... my answer to the original question is .. no, Boston and Journey don't belong given the current rules of including the band's whole catalogue (and in fact, I wouldn't include any of Boston's albums ... but Journey's first, mmm) 

 

"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2005 at 08:42
Boston/Journey are 100% AOR. People say adding the Who will be a disaster; imagine if people start trying to get there other favorite pop bands on here by using these sods as an example! To add them, yer gonna need more reasons also. The Who have more good reasons.
Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2005 at 10:33
How can somebody judges Journey as 100% AOR? Especially their first and third album are great examples of 'heavy progressive rock', miles away from the AOR with singer Steve Perry. It's the same nonsense as somebody named The Doors a medicore blues-oriented band. The forum seems a place were everybody can sublimate his anger/frustrations/disagreements into nailing good bands and good albums in often unfair and even ridiculous terms (like The Wizard). OK, it remains subjective but there are borders gentlemen!
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2005 at 10:54

Originally posted by erik neuteboom erik neuteboom wrote:

How can somebody judges Journey as 100% AOR? Especially their first and third album are great examples of 'heavy progressive rock', miles away from the AOR with singer Steve Perry. It's the same nonsense as somebody named The Doors a medicore blues-oriented band. The forum seems a place were everybody can sublimate his anger/frustrations/disagreements into nailing good bands and good albums in often unfair and even ridiculous terms (like The Wizard). OK, it remains subjective but there are borders gentlemen!

Sorry, but thats my opinion. I belive I am entitled to express, just as you are. I my opnion they are an AOR band. You have the right and are encouraged to think otherwise. Also, I don't usually nail other bands. There are others who are guiltier than me.

Also, I havn't heard there first album, so I have no to speak. Sorry.



Edited by The Wizard
Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2005 at 11:11
OK, The Wizard, I already had the idea that you had never heard their first album, it's really worth to check out, amazing guitarwork, powerful Hammond floods and the track Kohoutek is so compelling!
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 00:45
I've listened to Journey's first album twice already today ... very good album... I find it strange that people insist on rejecting the band because of the awful Steve Perry pop-era ... when they know that many other bands have made dramatic changes in style ...

Yhe PA problem is  that Journey's total career is at least 75% bland AOR pop-rock ... and we have a complete discographies rule ... but this is friendly advice just for the sake of the music ... don't pass on the debut especially if you can find it ...

These are the first two paragraphs of the bio on the official site ....

Founded in 1973 in San Francisco around former Santana members Neal Schon and Gregg Rolie, with the assistance of Ross Valory, George Tickner and Prairie Prince, Journey’s legacy has spanned over 30 years with 18 U.S. releases and over 75,000,000 in album sales. Their music is artful, intense, melodic rock played with passion and superb musicianship.

Journey’s initial style was progressive jazz-rock, complete with extended and improvised solo spots, a style much in evidence on their first three albums for Columbia Records. In April 1975 Tickner bowed out of music to attend Stanford Medical School. He was eventually replaced by ex-Alien Project vocalist, Steve Perry (following a brief tenure by Robert Fleischman).


 here's a typical Amazon review ...

Journey's terrific debut in 1975, January 15, 2006
Reviewer:Murat Batmaz (Istanbul, Turkey) - See all my reviews
REAL NAME   
Although America's melodic hard rock band Journey is most popular with their multi-hit producing Steve Perry era, the band actually started a lot earlier than Perry joined them. Formed by two former Santana members, Gregg Rolie on keyboards and vocals and Neal Schon on guitars, this amazing band actually captured a very nice progressive rock sound on their debut album. Though the following Gregg Rolie era records also had progressive elements, their self-titled release may be their most fusion-inspired release with amazing synth and organ sounds, killer dual lead guitars, and a fantastic rhythm duo.

Joining Rolie and Schon are drummer Aynsley Dunbar (also of Fank Zappa, Jeff Beck and Sammy Hagar fame), bassist Ross Valory and second guitarist George Tickner. This is also the only Journey release with Tickner on second guitar, as he decided to leave the music business after recording the album. Actually I'm of the opinion that Tickner and Gregg Rolie may have been huge factors in taking on a progressive songwriting attitude on this disc, since the band slowly departed from this approach on their following releases. Tickner not only supports the amazing Neal Schon, laying down choppy lead work, but he also wrote the instrumental track "Topaz", punctuated by deft acoustic passages and big synth washes. Gregg Rolie's organ sounds are huge, but he always gives Ross Valory enough space to provide a full bass bottom and drummer Dunbar to add some sick polyrhythms akin to his work on the earlier Zappa albums. The band delves into a mesmerizing jam session towards the end delivering fluctuating rhythms, awesome cymbal sounds, and a full-fledged keyboard lead. On "Of A Lifetime", Rolie introduces his trademark organ sound where he experiments with almost psychedelic soundscapes that would even surprise the biggest Eloy fans, but it is Neal Schon's unique sense of melody and phrasing on the guitar where no element overtreads each other. On this song, he goes from slowly building arpeggios to jaw-dropping whammy bar usage and finally fierce lead soloing as he is eventually joined by George Tickner for a full-on guitar attack in the outro. The other instrumental "Kohoutek" starts out as a moving piano ballad before gloomy guitar chords are thrown into the mix as pounding drum beats are heard and suddenly the listener is caught amidst madly wailing twin guitar harmonies, Moog sounds, jumping bass lines before things calm down and the piece concludes with a nifty piano melody, almost the same way it started. Among all these fusion-styled compositions are also shorter synth-pop tunes like "To Play Some Music" (which yet closes with another fusion solo) and the somewhat bluesy ballad combo "In My Lonely Feeling / Conversations", two songs that are merged into a single framework. The first part is hook-laden and melody-friendly displaying a beautiful vocal performance by Rolie, while "Conversations" is an all instrumental cut filled with rich bass and keyboard textures.

Unlike the Perry era, the Gregg Rolie albums all retain a characteristic prog vibe while still aiming at a more mainstream direction. In this respect, Journey might quite possibly be the one and only band which successfully balanced these two different visions. Though far from being commercially viable, I consider the first three Journey albums absolutely essential for any melodic prog rock fan that enjoys beautiful songwriting, defined by otherwordly guitars and excellent synth work, not to mention the amazing drum and bass combination of Valory and Dunbar.


"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 00:47
Originally posted by Trotsky Trotsky wrote:

Anyway, this is the last I'll say on the issue ... my answer to the original question is .. no, Boston and Journey don't belong given the current rules of including the band's whole catalogue (and in fact, I wouldn't include any of Boston's albums ... but Journey's first, mmm) 

 



I guess it wasn't
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Zac M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 01:06
Journey's first album is one of, if not my favorite, U.S. Prog albums, 4 stars, easily!!!

But still, they don't belong here as Trotsky already noted.
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."

-Merleau-Ponty
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 02:54

Originally posted by Trotsky Trotsky wrote:


Yhe PA problem is  that Journey's total career is at least 75% bland AOR pop-rock ... and we have a complete discographies rule ...

Hmm.

Why are Genesis here then?

Their total prog output is less than 30%, making 70% bland AOR and Pop music - almost the same as Journey.

Just a thought

Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 03:26
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Trotsky Trotsky wrote:


Yhe PA problem is  that Journey's total career is at least 75% bland AOR pop-rock ... and we have a complete discographies rule ...

Hmm.

Why are Genesis here then?

Their total prog output is less than 30%, making 70% bland AOR and Pop music - almost the same as Journey.

Just a thought



Just a thought? You're probably writing the bio as we speak ...
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 03:42
Originally posted by Trotsky Trotsky wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Trotsky Trotsky wrote:


Yhe PA problem is  that Journey's total career is at least 75% bland AOR pop-rock ... and we have a complete discographies rule ...

Hmm.

Why are Genesis here then?

Their total prog output is less than 30%, making 70% bland AOR and Pop music - almost the same as Journey.

Just a thought



Just a thought? You're probably writing the bio as we speak ...

Nah - no-one on the Admin team has asked me to...

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 04:05

Originally posted by meurglysIII meurglysIII wrote:

Journey's first album is one of, if not my favorite, U.S. Prog albums, 4 stars, easily!!!

But still, they don't belong here as Trotsky already noted.

 

I agree fully with the debut

The next two are still correct, but the Steve Perry stuff....

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 08:29
A controversial proposal Horza, but one I'd support.
Back to Top
Dr Know View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 532
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 10:34
The most proggish song by Boston would be Long Time/ Foreplay, which is on their debut album. Besides that, it´s just rock n roll.
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 15:22

Originally posted by Dr Know Dr Know wrote:

The most proggish song by Boston would be Long Time/ Foreplay, which is on their debut album. Besides that, it´s just rock n roll.

Indeed. However, I maintain that Boston's eponymous debut is one of THE definitive AOR albums. I was deeply disappointed with the follow up 'Don't Look Back' as it seemed to be a clone of the first album without any really memorable moments.

Still wouldn't support the inclusion of Boston or Journey though....

Back to Top
ANDREW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 04:43

Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

No, I don't think these bands should be here at all- the bands like Heep, Styx and Queen tended to be more complex and interesting musically than Boston or Journey. There are exceptions- for example, 'Foreplay' by Boston- but on the whole, it's melodic rock/AOR with little progressive in their catalogues. Not that I don't like these bands- they are great- but I personally find, say, Styx's early A & M albums, Queen's first few albums or Uriah Heep's albums until around 'Firefly' to be as progressive as Genesis in their own right. With Boston and Journey and Foreigner as well, it's mainly straight ahead rock on their albums with perhaps one progressive track.

I COMPLETELY AGREE!!!

Back to Top
ridingonacamel View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 04 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 19:01
Well to be fair we should put Journey on this site (and magnum)
Back to Top
GoldenSpiral View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 21:17
bah.

Boston and Journey were the mainstream b*****dization of prog.  Saying they are real prog rock is like saying Nickelback is a real heavy metal band.

On a more fun note, if you play Journey's "Separate Ways" on LP at very slow speeds, it sounds like tripped-out sludge metal, and is actually kind of cool.  aside from that, they got nothin.
http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 18 2006 at 00:05
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Hmm.

Why are Genesis here then?

Their total prog output is less than 30%, making 70% bland AOR and Pop music - almost the same as Journey.

Just a thought

I hate being carried towards Genesis posts, but facts are facts and numbers are numbers:

100% Progressive Rock Genesis albums:

  1. Trespass
  2. Nursery Cryme
  3. Foxtrot
  4. Live
  5. SEBTP
  6. The Lamb Lies Doewn on Broadway
  7. A Trick of the Tail
  8. Wind & Wuthering
  9. Seconds Out
  10. Archives I

Partially Progressive  Rock Genesis albums.

  1. ATTW3
  2. Duke
  3. Three Sides Live (Really the Four Sides Live)
  4. Archives II

POP Genesis albums

  1. ABACRAP
  2. Shapes
  3. Invisible Touch
  4. We Can't Dance
  5. From Genesis to the Revelation

Note: Don't count Calling all Stations because it is at least Prog Related, it's bad, it sucks, but it has a Progressive approach, so to be fair I won't count it for any of both sides.

Not counting compilations because it would be endless, lets see:

  • Total releaseas.....19
  • Progressive releases.....14 = 73.64% (Divided in)
    • 100% Prog albums....10 = 52.62%
    • Partially Prog.............04 = 21.03%
  • Pop releases...............05 = 26,36

So Cert, you have a lot of certificates and degrees in music, but seems you're not too strong im math.

There's no way, no matter what you do to ingnore than almost 3/4 of Genesis production is Progressive Rock, so please, use real facts.

If that is not enough for you, at least 4 Genesis albums are in the top 20 of any Prog list from any decent Progressive Rock website, magazine or book.

So please, don't place Genesis in the same parragraph with Journey, Boston or Foreigner, it's simply absurd, Genesis are Icons of Prog Rock, the other three are bands you can find anywhere.

Iván



Edited by ivan_2068
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.477 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.