Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Difference Between Psychedelic Rock and Space Rock
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDifference Between Psychedelic Rock and Space Rock
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Minimalist777 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 293 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Difference Between Psychedelic Rock and Space Rock
    Posted: September 26 2006 at 23:36

Hey the definition for this site seems to indicate a difference between psych rock and space rock. It also gives some examples of bands for each such as Floyd and the Ozric Tentacles for psych and Hawkwind and the English Amon Duul for space. However on Wikipedia it tends to lump Floyd, Ozrics etc. all into "space rock." So basically my question is... Is psych/space rock really two different things or is it just a very slight and rather inqonsiquential difference? Thanks for any help and God Bless, (or Goddess!)
WWOSD?
What Would OliverStoned Do?
Back to Top
superprog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1354 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:06
hahaha i'm always pretty confused abt this myself....so experts pls help us out!!!!
 
but if u ask me on a supercial level what distinguishes the 2 are:
 
1   instrumentation - more electronic stuff for space, more hard-edge fried guitar tones for psych
 
2   concept (obviously) worn on album sleeves (Hawkwind is the best eg)
 
3   time of origin - psych is a v 60s thing while space seems to have emerged from 70s onwards  (pls correct me if wrong)
 
4    drug of choice??? hehehe
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
cuncuna View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:15
Originally posted by superprog superprog wrote:

hahaha i'm always pretty confused abt this myself....so experts pls help us out!!!!
 

but if u ask me on a supercial level what distinguishes the 2 are:

 

1   instrumentation - more electronic stuff for space, more hard-edge fried guitar tones for psych

 

2   concept (obviously) worn on album sleeves (Hawkwind is the best eg)

 

3   time of origin - psych is a v 60s thing while space seems to have emerged from 70s onwards  (pls correct me if wrong)

 

4    drug of choice??? hehehe

 

 

 

 


I'm very clear regarding psychedelic's drug of choise; ¿but space rock more suitable substance?. That I don't know. Please elaborate on the "subject".
    
    

Edited by cuncuna - September 27 2006 at 00:16
¡Beware of the Bee!
   
Back to Top
superprog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1354 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:19
i mean, LSD was what really characterised psych rock right?  or practically CREATED it.....so what were Hawkwind on?? 
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:23
Originally posted by Minimalist777 Minimalist777 wrote:

Hey the definition for this site seems to indicate a difference between psych rock and space rock. It also gives some examples of bands for each such as Floyd and the Ozric Tentacles for psych and Hawkwind and the English Amon Duul for space. However on Wikipedia it tends to lump Floyd, Ozrics etc. all into "space rock." So basically my question is... Is psych/space rock really two different things or is it just a very slight and rather inqonsiquential difference? Thanks for any help and God Bless, (or Goddess!)

 
Psych rock-you sit around smoking a huge bong
Space rock-you sit around in your spaceship smoking a huge bong
Back to Top
surfdaddy View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 36 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:38
its all space rock then!
::Just Sittin here chillin::

Robby
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 00:41

Hi Minimalist: IMO Psychedelic and Space Oriented are two genres that shouldn't be together, I believe both were added originally in some other site because OPink Floyd evolved rom a Psychedelic to a Space band.

Psychedelic is a late 60's movement in USA and UK that was the direct ancester to Prog. Rock had evolved in something more complex than originally was to a more experimental genre...BUT IT'S STILL NOT PROG.

Spáce is a genre based in atmospheric and oneiric sounds, usually the keyboards were used for music and effects, probably an ancester of Electronic Prog..This is a 100% Prog sub-genre.
 
My two cents.
 
Iván 
            
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 01:52

I don't know about the history of the establishment of these genres, but currently there is not any collaborator assigned to look after these / it, so the genre is in a slight state of anarchy.

 

Let's look at the current categorizations:

 

Psychedelic/Space Rock

Psychedelic Progressive: Emerging in the mid-'60s, as British Invasion and folk-rock bands began expanding the sonic possibilities of their music. These groups confined themselves to the brief, concise verse-chorus-verse patterns of rock & roll, they moved toward more free-form, fluid song structures. Just as important, the groups began incorporating elements of Indian and Eastern music and free-form jazz to their sound, as well as experimenting with electronically altering instruments and voices within the studio. Bands range from early Pink Floyd, and Djam Karet, to newer artists like Phish and Ozric Tentacles. These days, psychedelic commonly informs music space rock and space fusion.

Space Progressive Rock: Space rock tends to be jam-orientated, with synthesizer and guitar effects approximating that propulsive "interstellar traveller" sensibility of vintage science fiction films. Hawkwind is the genre’s key innovator. Examples: Hawkwind, Alien Planetscapes, Quarkspace, Amon Düül (the English lineup).

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

IMO Psychedelic and Space Oriented are two genres that shouldn't be together, I believe both were added originally in some other site because OPink Floyd evolved rom a Psychedelic to a Space band.

In my deviating opinion, PINK FLOYD did not evolve as a "Space rock" band, as their post-psychedelia albums after 1970 are not jam-orientated, and their sound does not correlate with HAWKWIND's style, unlike their early freeform tunes like "Interstellar Overdrive", this underlined in the "Psychedelic Progressive" definition.  

One suggestion would be allowing "Psychedelic Progressive" to consume "Space Progressive Rock" completelly as a part of the genre, as the "Space Progressive Rock" is stated to be the common contemporary style of "Psychedelic Progressive". I underlined this section from the last line of "Psychedelic Progressive"'s definition. This would simplify this category, and the bands bolded in "Space Progressive Rock" fit into "Psychedelic Progressive" 100%

 

 

Here is the current "Psychedelic / Space Rock" artist list: http://www.progarchives.com/subgenre.asp?style=15

 

One thing to do before a clean up woul be measuring the interfaces which the genre has with othe categories. I think these would be such:

Indo-Prog/Raga Rock (elements of Indian and Eastern music)

Jazz Rock/Fusion (elements of free-form jazz)

 

Krautrock (German bands of the early '70s that expanded the sonic possibilities of art and progressive rock)

 

Prog Folk (Psychedelic folk) 

Proto-Prog (genre emerged from mid-60's, related bands are BEATLES, CREAM and early PINK FLOYD)

Prog Related (jam-oriented music)

Maybe also Canterbury Scene, Progressive Electronic and RIO/Avant-Prog? I'm not very experienced with these three genres.

 



Edited by Eetu Pellonpää - September 27 2006 at 01:54
Back to Top
Bilek View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 05 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1484 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 06:26

as much as I agree with the two collaborators right above; I'd like to add something:

Krautrock, Prog-Folk and Canterbury scene already includes what can be classified as such, no need to look for possible candidates in Space bands list. (well, there are several German bands in Space genre which actually fit in Krautrock better, but as these are already spaced-out acts, it's no wrong keeping them here)

as for proto-prog; Eetu is definitely right about Pink Floyd, so I have another solution, which I already expressed to Ghost Rider (who was suggesting to abolish "proto-prog" genre completely) in another thread:

let's just change this category's name to "Psychedelic Rock" so as to include mere psychedelic bands (those which were active before 1969), because all of the bands I know from the list (save Deep Purple, which must be included in a new genre as Heavy Prog) are psychedelic, this way or other... The list might even be expanded so as to include Doors, Who etc. (I know, many will object to that)
as much as Ivan is right to express that "psychedelic is not prog"; he already confesses that it was the "direct ancester to prog" (at least to certain styles; symphonic prog has little to do with psychedelia IMHO); this brings us to the very conception of "Proto-Prog".
 
actually most prog genres have a connection to psychedelia, even Zappa's earlier work can be classified as such. Having a seperate genre as "Psychedelia" will not ignore this connection; however pure psychedelic bands (i.e. those which did not evolve into space and other subgenres) shall remain in their respective places...
Listen to Turkish psych/prog; you won't regret:
Baris Manco,Erkin Koray,Cem Karaca,Mogollar,3 Hürel,Selda,Edip Akbayram,Fikret Kizilok,Ersen (and Dadaslar) (but stick with the '70's, and 'early 80's!)
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 06:58
Originally posted by superprog superprog wrote:

i mean, LSD was what really characterised psych rock right?  or practically CREATED it.....so what were Hawkwind on?? 
 
a more apt question would be "what weren't Hawkwind on?"
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20488 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 07:12
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Originally posted by superprog superprog wrote:

i mean, LSD was what really characterised psych rock right?  or practically CREATED it.....so what were Hawkwind on?? 
 
a more apt question would be "what weren't Hawkwind on?"
 
I can't wait to read that book I bought early this year to find out just what they were taking.
 
Lemmy was always openly pro drugs and sex, but apparently his RnR seemed to take a backseat to his other two activities.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 07:12
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Hi Minimalist: IMO Psychedelic and Space Oriented are two genres that shouldn't be together, I believe both were added originally in some other site because OPink Floyd evolved rom a Psychedelic to a Space band.

Psychedelic is a late 60's movement in USA and UK that was the direct ancester to Prog. Rock had evolved in something more complex than originally was to a more experimental genre...BUT IT'S STILL NOT PROG.

Spáce is a genre based in atmospheric and oneiric sounds, usually the keyboards were used for music and effects, probably an ancester of Electronic Prog..This is a 100% Prog sub-genre.
 
My two cents.
 
Iván 
 
Psychedelia and Space rock definately belong together. In fact, space rock I believe is more a theme than a genre and can appear in many different genres. For example, space themed music has been done by Hawkwind, Monster Magnet, Arcturus and Sirius, but I would not put all four of them in the same genre.
Back to Top
Bilek View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 05 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1484 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 07:34
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Originally posted by superprog superprog wrote:

i mean, LSD was what really characterised psych rock right?  or practically CREATED it.....so what were Hawkwind on?? 
 
a more apt question would be "what weren't Hawkwind on?"
 
I can't wait to read that book I bought early this year to find out just what they were taking.
 
Lemmy was always openly pro drugs and sex, but apparently his RnR seemed to take a backseat to his other two activities.
 
this gets more interesting in view of the fact that Lemmy was sacked from Hawks because of his drug addiction (well, at least some consequences of his addiction)


Edited by Bilek - September 27 2006 at 07:35
Listen to Turkish psych/prog; you won't regret:
Baris Manco,Erkin Koray,Cem Karaca,Mogollar,3 Hürel,Selda,Edip Akbayram,Fikret Kizilok,Ersen (and Dadaslar) (but stick with the '70's, and 'early 80's!)
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 07:38
^ He got separated from the band during a tour as he was arrested due possession of drugs. Why the band didn't take him back as he got free, remains mystery to me.
Back to Top
Bilek View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 05 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1484 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 07:43
apparently things got bitter between them, with or without the dugs...
the real mystery to me is that how could Lemmy use a Hawkwind title as the name and launching single for his new band?!?!?!? weren't there some kind of enmity? (besides, motörhead's style is completely different than that of hawkwind... maybe Lemmy wasn't even content with the band's direction, anyway!)
Listen to Turkish psych/prog; you won't regret:
Baris Manco,Erkin Koray,Cem Karaca,Mogollar,3 Hürel,Selda,Edip Akbayram,Fikret Kizilok,Ersen (and Dadaslar) (but stick with the '70's, and 'early 80's!)
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 08:05
Originally posted by Eetu Pellonpää Eetu Pellonpää wrote:

^ He got separated from the band during a tour as he was arrested due possession of drugs. Why the band didn't take him back as he got free, remains mystery to me.
 
Lemmy was arrested in canada when Hawkwind was doing a North American tour. Initially, the police thought it was either cocaine or heroin, which would have been a felony drug possession. It turned out to be another drug that was actually a misdemeanor possession. The band initially all wanted to fire Lemmy, fearing his drug abuse would jeopardise their tour of the USA, but during the band meeting began to balk. Nik Turner, who was getting sick and tired of everybody wanting to do something and then backing out of it, issued the ultimatum that they either stick by this decision or he would leave. So Lemmy was fired.
 
This is from what I read in Kris Tait's THIS IS HAWKWIND DO NOT PANIC and from various interviews with Hawkwind.


Edited by darksinger - September 27 2006 at 08:07
Back to Top
Kleynan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 28 2006
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 720 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 08:53

Porcupine Tree should be moved to Art-Rock in my opinion. They were psychedelic at the start of their career, and have always had some psychedelic tendensies, yes. But they've compassed so many different genres, and that's the trademark of an art-rock band. Sorry if I got a little of subject.


You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 13:10
Originally posted by Bilek Bilek wrote:

 
Great...more material to talk about Wink I love that.
 
as much as I agree with the two collaborators right above; I'd like to add something:

Krautrock, Prog-Folk and Canterbury scene already includes what can be classified as such, no need to look for possible candidates in Space bands list. (well, there are several German bands in Space genre which actually fit in Krautrock better, but as these are already spaced-out acts, it's no wrong keeping them here)

Canterbury already has a Psyche element blended with Fusion and of course a clear ethnic reference, so I don't see why change things there, the same happens with Kraut, I believe the things are clear there. 
 
as for proto-prog; Eetu is definitely right about Pink Floyd, so I have another solution, which I already expressed to Ghost Rider (who was suggesting to abolish "proto-prog" genre completely) in another thread:
 
Honestly I don't believe Proto Prog must abolished by any means, Psychedelia and Progressive Rock are two different genres, related as an a grandfather to his grandson  and nothing more.
 
Proto Prog is the natural link between both, despite it has some Psyche elements, there has to be a link between Psyche and Prog, things don't happen in one instant, the Romantic musicians of December 31, 1899 didn't turned into Modern Musicians Jan 1, 1900 by art of magic, there was a link that started with Wagner and wiith the Russian Nationalist movement, this last one also called Post Romantic.
 
The same happens with Psyche, it didn't turned by art of magic into Prog, there had to be a missing link and thuis is Proto Prog.
 
let's just change this category's name to "Psychedelic Rock" so as to include mere psychedelic bands (those which were active before 1969), because all of the bands I know from the list (save Deep Purple, which must be included in a new genre as Heavy Prog) are psychedelic, this way or other... The list might even be expanded so as to include Doors, Who etc. (I know, many will object to that)
 
Arthur Brown Psychedelic? Please man Arthur Brown did something Psychedelic musicians didn't dreamed of, blended several genres, from Prog to Hard Rock with the druggy Psychedelia........... Sweetw@ter added orchestral arrangements and even Cello and Flute to the Farfuisa Organ based Psychedelia, the Moody Blues added a full Symphony Orchestra and there's very little of Psychedelia in them.
 
as much as Ivan is right to express that "psychedelic is not prog"; he already confesses that it was the "direct ancester to prog" (at least to certain styles; symphonic prog has little to do with psychedelia IMHO); this brings us to the very conception of "Proto-Prog".
 
Yes, they are the direct ancester but because it's the genre more related, Proto Prog is more a missing link betwen both genres that explain why some bands remained making druggy Farfisa solos shouting against Vietnam and others progressed into full Prog bands.
 
actually most prog genres have a connection to psychedelia, even Zappa's earlier work can be classified as such. Having a seperate genre as "Psychedelia" will not ignore this connection; however pure psychedelic bands (i.e. those which did not evolve into space and other subgenres) shall remain in their respective places...}
 
Sorry, but Zappa has a connection with nobody, Zappa was Zappa and nothing more can describe him, some sites mention Zappa Music as a sub-genre in himself, I don't agree with personally created sub-genres but Frank is the case in which I'm closer to believe, because Zappa is a whole universe in himself.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - September 27 2006 at 13:14
            
Back to Top
Pneubauer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 16 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 256 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 16:51
Originally posted by Bilek Bilek wrote:

apparently things got bitter between them, with or without the dugs...
the real mystery to me is that how could Lemmy use a Hawkwind title as the name and launching single for his new band?!?!?!? weren't there some kind of enmity? (besides, motörhead's style is completely different than that of hawkwind... maybe Lemmy wasn't even content with the band's direction, anyway!)


Maybe he used the name Motörhead because its slang for a speed user... which is exactly what he and the rest of the band are? LOL

Makes sense to me.
Back to Top
Zoot Allures View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 127 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 21:47
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Originally posted by Minimalist777 Minimalist777 wrote:

Hey the definition for this site seems to indicate a difference between psych rock and space rock. It also gives some examples of bands for each such as Floyd and the Ozric Tentacles for psych and Hawkwind and the English Amon Duul for space. However on Wikipedia it tends to lump Floyd, Ozrics etc. all into "space rock." So basically my question is... Is psych/space rock really two different things or is it just a very slight and rather inqonsiquential difference? Thanks for any help and God Bless, (or Goddess!)

 
Psych rock-you sit around smoking a huge bong
Space rock-you sit around in your spaceship smoking a huge bong
 
LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOLClap
The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. - Hunter S. Thompson
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.