Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Any other prog-rock vegans/vegetarians out there?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAny other prog-rock vegans/vegetarians out there?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Fighter View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: October 30 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Any other prog-rock vegans/vegetarians out there?
    Posted: February 01 2013 at 00:10
anyone else take their progressiveness farther than their musical tastes and onto their plate?  I've been a vegan for a couple of months now, and was somewhat inspired by Jon Anderson actually (though he apparently now eats fish).  I personally got into veganism because of ethical reasons; i felt as though i should limit my exploitation of other beings, but after only a few weeks i was feeling health benefits as well.  I dont really know any other vegans, so i'd love to connect with some people who share musical tastes and diet!

Edited by Fighter - February 01 2013 at 00:11
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 03:08
I wish you well with your chosen lifestyle diet, and I have no desire to argue, but I do take exception at the word "ethical".
What?
Back to Top
Fighter View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: October 30 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 04:08
haha, sorry if you took that personally.  I didn't mean to say i think others are living unethically, but just that i feel like i am living most ethically this way.  there's lots of arguments about why it is more ethical (just one would be the amount of food used to fatten up live-stock could feed all the worlds starving people many times over) and i found those arguments spoke to me, but really got to me was just that i wanted to more fully express my compassion for other living beings and nature by letting animals live their lives instead of endorsing their exploitation.  theres also arguments that say being vegan is not ethical, ive read tons of them when i was new to veganism, and to be honest i found the reasoning behind those arguments to be poor.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 04:26
If we didn't eat  meat and dairy there would be fewer animals. They wouldn't  be living their lives. They wouldn't exist.
I also object to something you said about taking your progresivness further.


Edited by Snow Dog - February 01 2013 at 04:30
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 05:27
As I said, no desire to argue. 'Ethical' invokes the morality of right and wrong, implying that one is more right for adopting a particular lifestyle choice than someone who doesn't. I fully support and endorse any choice that relieves suffering and harm to another creature, call that compassion or empathy or sympathy if you will, but not being a vegan is not an unethical choice. Therefore any reasoning that veganism is ethical or not is always going to be poor because arguing the morality of right and wrong is not determined by diet, if that were so then lions, wolves, bears, sharks, piranhas, crocodiles, snakes, badgers, mink, ferrets, moles, eagles, vultures, crows, venus flytraps, bacteria, blowflies and all other meat-eating creatures would be wrong and immoral and thus would be unethical by the standards you would adopt for an omnivorous creature, such as a human. Saying you have no wish to eat any food that exploits an animal is okay, though claiming that in doing so would allow them to live their lives instead is debatable (and ultimately false), so calling it more ethical is emotive but incorrect. It is a choice you make, (albeit one that modern arable farming technology has allowed you to make), just as my choosing not to eat cauliflower is a choice I make.
 
Anyway, I wish you good luck and happiness.
What?
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 06:05
As do I -

Welcome to the forum - you may find this thread of interest too.

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 06:07
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

As do I -

Welcome to the forum - you may find this thread of interest too.

I think we covered most everything there.Smile
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 08:51
Vegetarianism isn't progressive eating, it's regressive eating.
I'm in the Anthony Bourdain school on this one.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:11
Originally posted by Fighter Fighter wrote:

anyone else take their progressiveness farther than their musical tastes and onto their plate?  I've been a vegan for a couple of months now, and was somewhat inspired by Jon Anderson actually (though he apparently now eats fish).  I personally got into veganism because of ethical reasons; i felt as though i should limit my exploitation of other beings, but after only a few weeks i was feeling health benefits as well.  I dont really know any other vegans, so i'd love to connect with some people who share musical tastes and diet!
 
I tried eating In The Court of the Crimson King once.  It was hard to chew and I think I broke a tooth.  Ouch
 
Same results with Camel, Genesis and Yes.  Eating prog-rock is not for me thanks.  Wink
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
wilmon91 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:19
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Therefore any reasoning that veganism is ethical or not is always going to be poor because arguing the morality of right and wrong is not determined by diet, if that were so then lions, wolves, bears, sharks, piranhas, crocodiles, snakes, badgers, mink, ferrets, moles, eagles, vultures, crows, venus flytraps, bacteria, blowflies and all other meat-eating creatures would be wrong and immoral and thus would be unethical by the standards you would adopt for an omnivorous creature, such as a human.


Those animals doesn't have the freedom to choose as humans do. I don't know if it's possible for a wolf to start eating vegetables. And even if they could, they might not have the intellectual reasoning capability to convince themselves to stop eating animals.

Living beings fight for survival. But if you have freedomof choice, you can consider different options. With more freedom comes more responsibility.


Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Vegetarianism isn't progressive eating, it's regressive eating.
I'm in the Anthony Bourdain school on this one.


Have you heard of a vegetarian or herbivore who have turned into a carnivore? Not very common.
Have you heard of a carnivore that switched to a herbivore/vegetarian? Much more common. I heard of carnovourous dinosaurs that went herbivores. They still had claws and sharp teeth but gradually developed features more adapted to eating plants (during the course of millions of years I guess).

So with that reasoning, it seems like a more progressive thing to start eating vegetables than starting to kill animals. What if horses started to kill animalsand eat them? Would that be a constructive step in the right direction for their evolution?
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:22
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:34



Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Vegetarianism isn't progressive eating, it's regressive eating.
I'm in the Anthony Bourdain school on this one.


Have you heard of a vegetarian or herbivore who have turned into a carnivore? Not very common.
Have you heard of a carnivore that switched to a herbivore/vegetarian? Much more common. I heard of carnovourous dinosaurs that went herbivores. They still had claws and sharp teeth but gradually developed features more adapted to eating plants (during the course of millions of years I guess).

So with that reasoning, it seems like a more progressive thing to start eating vegetables than starting to kill animals. What if horses started to kill animalsand eat them? Would that be a constructive step in the right direction for their evolution?
[/QUOTE]
Ah, but in the 803rd millenium, the Morlocks evolve into cannibals, so perhaps that is the most "progressive" state.  Geek
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
wilmon91 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:35
But I wouldn't say it's wrong to be a carnivore. But we can always evaluate our habits and develop them in any direction that seems interesting or valuable for us.

I took a step towards vegetarianism 10 months ago. But the main principle is to eat less meat and better food in general. But I still eat chicken and fish, so I'm not really a vegetarian. I mostly vegetarian food though. First I thought it would be too difficult for me to become a vegetarian, but I'm not sure what made me go through with that change (of not eating meat except chicken and fish). It was just a feeling, it was not about morals. I wouldn't have gone through that change if I didn't feel like it. I can still eat red meat if I want to though, but  I haven't so far. I've been tempted to eat lamb....but I think I can resist the temptation for some more time. It's all dependent on my learning new vegetarian stuff to eat. Because it's sad to sacrifise great food experiences and just make it into a necessity. I value food highly.

With that said I can't promise that I won't start eating red meat again, or start allowing some specific kinds of meat......but I don't like the idea.


Edited by wilmon91 - February 01 2013 at 09:43
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66692
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 09:37
I really don't like to eat vegetables other than potatoes and carrots, so it would be nearly impossible for me to become a vegetarian.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 10:24
Originally posted by wilmon91 wilmon91 wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Therefore any reasoning that veganism is ethical or not is always going to be poor because arguing the morality of right and wrong is not determined by diet, if that were so then lions, wolves, bears, sharks, piranhas, crocodiles, snakes, badgers, mink, ferrets, moles, eagles, vultures, crows, venus flytraps, bacteria, blowflies and all other meat-eating creatures would be wrong and immoral and thus would be unethical by the standards you would adopt for an omnivorous creature, such as a human.


Those animals doesn't have the freedom to choose as humans do. I don't know if it's possible for a wolf to start eating vegetables. And even if they could, they might not have the intellectual reasoning capability to convince themselves to stop eating animals.

Living beings fight for survival. But if you have freedomof choice, you can consider different options. With more freedom comes more responsibility.

Wolves are omnivores (as are bears, piranhas, badgers and crows) but prefer meat - given the free choice between a rabbit and a potato the wolf will eat the rabbit. Lions however are carnivores - they cannot digest plant matter efficiently enough for survival.
 
The freedom to choose has nothing to do with intellectual reasoning nor does it impose any responsibility. You can choose because you are an omnivore and you have a choice because intensive arable farming has permitted it.
 
 
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 10:51
Originally posted by wilmon91 wilmon91 wrote:


Have you heard of a vegetarian or herbivore who have turned into a carnivore? Not very common.
Have you heard of a carnivore that switched to a herbivore/vegetarian? Much more common. I heard of carnovourous dinosaurs that went herbivores. They still had claws and sharp teeth but gradually developed features more adapted to eating plants (during the course of millions of years I guess).

So with that reasoning, it seems like a more progressive thing to start eating vegetables than starting to kill animals. What if horses started to kill animalsand eat them? Would that be a constructive step in the right direction for their evolution?
This isn't accurate. Most dinosaurs were herbivores and some of those became carnivores. Logic dictates that herbivores have to evolve before carnivores, every carnivore evolved from a non-carnivorous animal.
 
Of course a horse can evolve into an omnivorous creature given enough time - of all the grazing herbivores its digestive system is non-ruminant so would not require a massive evolutionary change to adopt a meat-diet - at first they would most likely be scavenging carrion eaters (like pigs) using meat to supplement their predominantly herbivorous diet, before evolving into creatures capable of hunting and killing prey. Deciding whether that is a constructive step is applying judgemental reasoning to a natural process - if it offends you that is a different issue but it is neither non-progressive nor is it non-constructive.
What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 11:08
I once took my progressiveness too literally further and eat a little bit of Phil Collins' right butt cheek but it tasted like smelly fish so I returned to regressive non-homosapiens meat. 
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34090
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 12:18
Pandas are carnivores (or omnivores) but have an almost 100% livs of bamboo and plant food, Polar Beer is a omnivore and is 100% carnivore, most logically becouse of the lack of fruits and vegetables in Svalbard. 

Edited by aginor - February 01 2013 at 12:19
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 13:55
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

 
ClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClapClap


Time always wins.
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2013 at 14:04
I still maintain that chosing not to eat meat is regressive.  If, all of a sudden, we all starting limiting ourselves to ingesting three-cord songs I'd call that regressive too.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.