Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rolling Stone's 500 Worst Reviews
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRolling Stone's 500 Worst Reviews
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Rolling Stone's 500 Worst Reviews
    Posted: February 23 2014 at 04:07
This list from RYM has probably already been posted here, but if that's the case I haven't seen it as it will have been a long time ago. Amusing and interesting reading, first because it shows how much conventional wisdom on so many legendary records has changed since the time of their release, second because it shows how many of RS' writers might have been among the first to take rock music seriously as a form of art but certainly weren't very good at it.


Edited by Toaster Mantis - February 23 2014 at 04:08
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65244 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2014 at 04:59
how about Rolling Stone's Worst-Written Reviews, that'd be good for a laugh
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2014 at 19:15
^ Admittedly that's what I thought this was going to be.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2014 at 19:58
I would like to see that.
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
irrelevant View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 00:18
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

^ Admittedly that's what I thought this was going to be.
I hoped that was what it was going to be. 
New album!
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 03:54
Well, that's partially what it is...

Originally posted by schmidtt schmidtt wrote:

The reviews generally break down into five categories:

(1) Poorly Written Reviews: Self-explanatory. Most of these were written when RS was in its infancy, and no one knew what the hell they were doing.


I actually find it more interesting how many sacred cow albums got a lukewarm or downright negative reception upon release, I always knew that could sometimes be the case but had no idea how often that happened. Really makes you think about the processes that causes music to be seen as "dated" because apparently it happens in reverse just as often.

(on a related note, I often wonder how much of music's datedness has to do with production technique)
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Chimaera View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: February 04 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 87 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 08:31
Rolling Stone reviews suck.

They are just one persons opinion. At least on here there are lots of one persons opinions so you get a broader view.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 08:55
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Well, that's partially what it is...

Originally posted by schmidtt schmidtt wrote:

The reviews generally break down into five categories:

(1) Poorly Written Reviews: Self-explanatory. Most of these were written when RS was in its infancy, and no one knew what the hell they were doing.


I actually find it more interesting how many sacred cow albums got a lukewarm or downright negative reception upon release, I always knew that could sometimes be the case but had no idea how often that happened. Really makes you think about the processes that causes music to be seen as "dated" because apparently it happens in reverse just as often.

(on a related note, I often wonder how much of music's datedness has to do with production technique)

I don't believe production technique has anything to do with music sounding "dated". there are many jazz albums out there that are 60, 70 or more ears old, yet they sound hot and fresh. I don't give a heck about the production of an album. or perhaps I do, but rather the opposite way: I prefer a less than erfect production because it does not sound so sterile


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 13:17
Well, there's some production technologies that are very specifically associated with particular times and places like vocoders with the disco age of the late 1970s or reverbed drums with the 1980s or "scooped" guitar sounds (all low-end/high-end with little mid-end) with the early 1990s.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2014 at 11:10
I prefer to call it 3.5 Star Magazine.
My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.