Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
Battle of the Prog Bands SFD2: Floyd vs. Rush |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1234 8> |
| Author | ||||
Andy Webb 
Special Collaborator 
Retired Admin Joined: June 04 2010 Location: Terria Status: Offline Points: 13298 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: November 13 2010 at 17:46 |
|||
|
oh sheit it's getting close!
i went with rush, purely because floyd died way too quickly. and the final cut is a little bit odd....
|
||||
 
|
||||
 |
||||
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 17:51 |
|||
|
Pink Floyd by a long distance, even if my favourite work they were involved on, and pissed on, I think of as more of a Ron Geesin work. I love the "Atom Heart Mother" suite. I also like earlier albums by Floyd very much, and am not really that into post Meddle albums anymore, though I can still enjoy them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member 
Joined: September 11 2007 Location: SanDiegoTijuana Status: Offline Points: 4373 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 17:52 |
|||
|
Can't vote. Both are pathetic.
|
||||
|
||||
|
40footwolf
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2010 Status: Offline Points: 651 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 18:41 |
|||
|
||||
|
Heaven's made a cesspool of us all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 19:05 |
|||
Why not use these to choose which you dislike the least? |
||||
|
||||
|
TrevRockOne
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2008 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 19:14 |
|||
|
Just wanted to point out that the score is currently 21 12. Sadly, in the wrong direction though.
 |
||||
|
||||
|
Anthony H.
Prog Reviewer 
Joined: April 11 2010 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 6088 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 19:20 |
|||
|
Floyd. No disrespect to Rush, though.
|
||||
 |
||||
|
||||
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17831 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 20:23 |
|||
|
Its time for the torch to be passed on from Floyd, KC to Rush...l mean why not? That's what retirees do right, they give up their window offices, parking spots to the ones that remain. The Body of Work clearly goes to Rush...album by album there is no comparison. That does not look to stop anytime soon either. The Influence should go to PF....but why? Rush has and will end up influencing many more generations than the wonderful Floyd will IMO, within many more genres too.I enjoy a lot of Pink Floyd...I do....but, Pink Floyd quit, they could not get along, they could not put the differences aside, makeup and continue. Rush has never had these self-inflicted issues......their longevity and the mere fact they enjoy doing what they do album after album and tour after tour is unbelievable...it does not happen anymore.
Make a statement and vote for the "new" guy.........vote Rush.
  Edited by Catcher10 - November 13 2010 at 20:24 |
||||
  
|
||||
|
||||
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18016 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 20:31 |
|||
|
FYI Rush has been around nearly as long as Pink Floyd
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 20:36 |
|||
|
Most definitely PF, Rush is great, but early Floyd is so yummy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
hektur
Forum Newbie 
Joined: September 05 2009 Location: NB, Canada Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 20:38 |
|||
|
Rush - They introduced me to prog. Close call though. Edit: Seems that I can not vote for some reason, but if I was able it'd be Rush. Edited by hektur - November 13 2010 at 20:39 |
||||
|
||||
|
The_Jester
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2010 Status: Offline Points: 741 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 13 2010 at 20:41 |
|||
|
Pink Floyd before Dark Side of the Moon.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Billy Pilgrim
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 28 2010 Location: Austin Status: Offline Points: 1505 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:19 |
|||
|
Any one member of Rush is twice as talented as Pink Floyd as a whole band. Boring lifeless musicians who wrote good lyrics and good melodies, but that's it. Sorry, just my opinion.
|
||||
|
||||
|
TheClosing
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 11 2010 Status: Offline Points: 527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:25 |
|||
With dedication anyone can become a monster musician, but not everyone is born with the gift of songwriting. This is exactly why PF wins by miles.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA Status: Offline Points: 1902 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:36 |
|||
|
I used to like PF a lot back in freshman, sophomore year of high school. Now, I don't as much, but I fstill ind them quite enjoyable. Rush, however, is one of my all time favorites. I vote Rush.
Shame my two favorites in the semifinals will probably lose (Genesis already lost).
Oh well  Edited by Lark the Starless - November 14 2010 at 00:37 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:39 |
|||
How so? Floyd spread themselves across a much wider variety of music. Do people really forget that the same band that Waters drove to make Animals and Wall (after hitting the big time with Dark Side of the Moon) had also made Piper...and Saucerful of Secrets in the 60s? Rush may have made more albums and more good albums, but I don't choose Motorhead over Black Sabbath and likewise won't take Rush over Floyd for merely being more prolific.
Mind if I ask what does that really say about their music anyway because you brought up the same line of argument in the Beatles-Rush poll?
Rush are hardly new and nor is their music particularly foraying into new territories at the moment. They got trademarked as far back as the 80s. |
||||
|
||||
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:41 |
|||
Lifeson twice as talented as THE Dave Gilmour, the king of bends and vibrato? Gimme a break! Lifeson doesn't even do his technical rock stuff too cleanly unlike the other monsters from the 70s like Roth, Schenker and Eddie Van Halen and some of his solos, like Freewill, are not too good at all. No debate on Lee and Peart but then again, having better players never made a better band. |
||||
|
||||
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 00:48 |
|||
Would really love to listen to this far more awesome equivalent of Echoes, for I have never heard one.  |
||||
|
||||
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17831 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 01:16 |
|||
On Influence, its my personal opinion about both bands...not the whole genre or time frame they may be influencing.
You can ask anything you like......My personal belief is a band that enjoys playing music together as one cohesive unit makes better music longterm than a band that does not and has a lot of internal issues. And for these two bands that proof is in the pudding....I am sure you get my point that longevity is one main attribute of success...for me.
I doubt any band starts out to only be mildly succesful...The Beatles, Pink Floyd or Rush....and since you brought that other poll into this, yes I do feel Rush are more succesful than The Beatles for having the stamina and focus to continue for 35 yrs.
We can only guess at what the fab4 would have done or become, but most here don't think it would have been pretty or lasted long at all.....but who knows.
Your last point I don't understand....you said the following above "...Floyd spread themselves across a much wider variety of music"......I think most would be fine subing in Rush for Floyd in your sentence..Pink Floyd could have been trademarked in the 70's.
Anyhow its all matter of opinion....music is art.
Thanks for the post!!!
 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
mark4art
Forum Groupie 
Joined: July 13 2010 Location: Lowestoft Status: Offline Points: 56 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2010 at 01:30 |
|||
|
Pink Floyd
|
||||
|
||||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 8> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Triceratopsoil wrote: